I was thinking about the problem of psychology and realised that we also 
have a problem with Systems Theory. As a science even newer than 
psychology, the systems sciences have exactly the same problem. There is 
no agreement at all about what a system is. Many definitions are about 
parts and wholes, but there is no such thing as a part and a whole, they 
are so entangled and unentanglable to make such definitions unworkable 
as sson as we take it out of the folk systems world. There is a paper 
written about the problem that lists around 200 definitions. There is 
also the exact same problem with sub disciplines thinking they are the 
whole discipline. Eventhough we all come together at conferences and 
generally get on pretty well, there is no uniting concept. The systems 
dynamics people and the critical systems don't really sit next to each 
other. Even just the basic systems, cybernetics and complexity 
distinctions are problematic.

############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1