VADCFLL-L Archives

November 2015

VADCFLL-L@LISTSERV.JMU.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Francisco Ruvalcaba <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Francisco Ruvalcaba <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 9 Nov 2015 22:08:18 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2851 bytes) , text/html (3375 bytes)
I don't think your app accounts for the black bars interactions.Example:
I read somewhere that the Demolition challenge is worth 85 points, but since the black bars THAT are part of the demolition model are not in their original position anymore those bars are potentially -16 points each (you lose the +8 points for not being in the original position, plus you score -8 points if you don't do anything else with them, like landfill or placing them in the green bin).
Similarly with the large toy plane box.When brought to base the plane box is worth +40However the plane box has 2 black bars, which are not in the original position, so they lose +8, and in addition score -8 if the black bars are not landfilled or the compost is not place in the toy box.But if the compost is placed in the toy box (+40 for repurposing), then the black bars regain their +8 points, plus they lose their -8 points because they are not "anywhere else", according to M04 Sorting, second bullet...
(I believe I got this right...)Why is scoring so complicated this year????
Does your app really account for all these black bar's variations?Please advice, our team is competing in Staunton in less than 2 weeks.Thank you.
Paco RuvalcabaCoach Hybrid Geckos.> Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 15:39:40 -0500
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [VADCFLL-L] Tournament scores
> To: [log in to unmask]
> 
> @Tweeks:  Could you let us know what "grading errors" were in the scoring tool we made that you referred to in your post?   It has been tested by many refs. It was used at a Qualifying Tournament last weekend and the refs and/or teams using it have not mentioned any error.
> 
> If there are errors, we would love the opportunity to correct calculation issues or clarify wording if it was just an interpretation issue by teams.
> 
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ev3lessons.com_resources_scorer_score.html-23en-2Dus&d=BQIFAw&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=J5fb0ELkRoh7TzAGYz99sSMvB-c7i4AC0HDT2OVPrww&m=yTWlxS-X-AQOnkvnwjvKy2AW31MHdq_qKb5bpmZwmp4&s=YbA7drwqCwSfztiQRQUBXxxnsLPEu4iQo3kcLF1iwbk&e= 
> 
> Thank you,
> Sanjay and Arvind
> EV3Lessons
> 
> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE or CHANGE your settings, please visit https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-l.html and select "Join or leave the list".
> 
> -- VADCFLL administrative announcements are sent via VADCFLL-ANNOUNCEMENTS-L. Visit https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-ANNOUNCEMENTS-l.html to subscribe.
 		 	   		  
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE or CHANGE your settings, please visit https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-l.html and select "Join or leave the list".

-- VADCFLL administrative announcements are sent via VADCFLL-ANNOUNCEMENTS-L. Visit https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-ANNOUNCEMENTS-l.html to subscribe.


ATOM RSS1 RSS2