VADCFLL-L Archives

First Lego League in Virginia and DC

VADCFLL-L@LISTSERV.JMU.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Glenn Roberts <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Glenn Roberts <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 9 Sep 2009 19:33:59 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (69 lines)
I agree it's a bit of a letdown. When our team put the field kit components
together in August we were excited to note that the bridges from the two
tables would abut - wow, maybe a team could get more than 400 points by
"crossing the bridge" to score points on the other table?!  Or some other
interesting interaction!  The red vs. yellow distinction is a letdown from
our expectations (and only worth an extra 5 points on red?!).

Seems likely that some of the robots will wander onto the alternate team's
table (either deliberately or due to navigation errors) - should be
interesting to see how the judges treat that.

Glenn Roberts



-----Original Message-----
From: First Lego League in Virginia and DC
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steve Scherr
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 11:53 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [VADCFLL-L] No shared mission this year???

I would suggest a different view of "leave the robot on the red spot".

The red decking on the bridge is a shared, interaction zone.
It seems difficult to arrange for two robots to both satisfy the Vehicle 
Sharing (red decking) scoring criterion simulaneously.
Probably the first robot vehicle to the spot is in a better position to 
score, but that isn't certain.

It feels like a "competitive" situation to me.

I know that teams can choose to go for the Target Spot instead of Vehicle 
Sharing, to avoid the interaction region. That presents a different set of 
obstacles, and is an example of teams being able to choose what move they 
make.

Steve Scherr

On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:09:31 -0400, Robert Haskins 
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>Am I misunderstanding the missions, or is there no "true" shared
>mission this year? I don't count the "leave the robot on the red spot
>on the bridge" option as a shared mission, sorry. If so, it'll be the
>first time in the 6 years I have done FLL that there is no shared
>mission. Wacky.
>
>--
>Haskins Family Farm
>Middletown, VA
>http://www.localharvest.org/farms/M20435
>

______________________________________________________________
To UNSUBSCRIBE or CHANGE YOUR SETTINGS, please visit
https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-l.html and select "Join or leave
the list".

If you want to join the VADCFLL-ADMIN-L mailing list - to which FLL
administrative announcements will be distributed - visit
https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-admin-l.html and select "Join or
leave the list".

______________________________________________________________
To UNSUBSCRIBE or CHANGE YOUR SETTINGS, please visit https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-l.html and select "Join or leave the list".

If you want to join the VADCFLL-ADMIN-L mailing list - to which FLL administrative announcements will be distributed - visit https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-admin-l.html and select "Join or leave the list".

ATOM RSS1 RSS2