LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for VADCFLL-L Archives


VADCFLL-L Archives

VADCFLL-L Archives


VADCFLL-L@LISTSERV.JMU.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

VADCFLL-L Home

VADCFLL-L Home

VADCFLL-L  October 2008

VADCFLL-L October 2008

Subject:

Re: food for thought about scores

From:

John Barrett <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:39:41 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (142 lines)

Tournament day is long and tiring.  I agree.  And personally, I would 
love to see what other teams have done for their project but by the end 
of the day, my concentration is gone.  I do, however, like the idea of 
sharing project presentations.  I suggest that we, the coaches of the 
teams here in VA, take it upon ourselves to self-publish our team's 
project presentations via YouTube.  OK, so I'm partial to that medium 
since the kids used it last year as a mechanism to share our team's 
project.  The nice thing about doing it via YouTube (or other Web-based 
medium) is that your team members can share their work with friends and 
family everywhere.  One parent told me that her family in India was 
thrilled to see the video.

Last year the kids decided to do a skit and videotape it which made it a 
natural for YouTube.  (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDKkVhY911E)   A 
five minute video tape of a presentation, even if it just a practice 
round, would be really helpful to other coaches and teams.  And if your 
team wins an award for their project (or robot design) then show it 
off!  (No, we didn't win an award for our presentation, but I don't 
think the kids really minded since they had such a fun time making the 
video).

When you publish the video, be sure to let the listserv know.

John
Co-Coach of the Lake Anne Sea Monsters


Michael Blanpied wrote:
> I like Stephanie's idea of having top-rated teams demonstrate their 
> prowess during the closing ceremony. It would be both fun and 
> educational for the other teams, and would give the performing teams 
> (and their coaches and parents) some extra strokes for their months of 
> hard work.
>
> Cynthia is right that the big tournaments are long and draining, but 
> I've found that the closing ceremony is more refreshing than 
> exhausting. It's the first time in the day that the teams get to 
> relax, sit down, and not be rushing to adjust a program or rushing off 
> to meet judges. Yes, it would take more (even more) volunteer effort 
> to identify, contact and organize the teams chosen to perform, but 
> we're only talking about a 5-minute performance, a 2.5-minute robot 
> routine, and perhaps a 3-minute talk about robot design, so the added 
> time would be small.
>
> I've taken two teams to the Ashburn tournament. It's a terrific event, 
> very well run. But the day is just so darned full and busy--with four 
> robot events and three judging events plus opening and closing 
> ceremonies plus robot practice time--that none of us have seen a 
> single other team compete. The team is so intent on their own robot 
> that they don't even watch the robot on the adjoining table. And the 
> awards ceremony conveys no information about -why- each team got the 
> award they did. I've used photographs and YouTube videos to 
> demonstrate to the team the breadth of strategies and approaches that 
> have been taken in past years, but haven't gotten much traction. 
> Catching their attention in the heat of the moment, when their brains 
> are still perking about the competition, would be more useful.
>
> Something to consider, at least?
>
> Cheers,
> Mike
>
> At 8:40 AM -0400 10/16/08, Burke, Stephanie wrote:
>> One idea I think would be useful is to have the top teams demonstrate
>> their work at the end of the tournament during the awards ceremony.
>> Have the team with the top challenge score re-run their 2.5 min missions
>> when everyone can watch it.  Then the team with the top
>> design/programming score show their robot and describe a few of their
>> unique features, and the team with the winning project presentation
>> re-run their presentation.  This way, all the teams have a chance to see
>> what a really good team (of kids just like them) can do, and what is
>> possible.  In my experience, they are so busy during the day, they have
>> little time to really see what the others teams did, and don't really
>> know which of the teams they do see are the best.  I think that most of
>> the teams can then see how their results compare to the best at the
>> competition without worrying about a specific score, and that gives them
>> a very good understanding of what they could work on for next year.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: First Lego League Discussion
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Robert Haskins
>> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 8:25 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [VADCFLL-L] food for thought about scores
>>
>> Speaking as a coach, *any* feedback would be better than what we get
>> now, which is basically a score (with the recent discussion, per the
>> FLL the score means "almost nothing"). Noting the rubric with how the
>> team could improve on specific rubric items would be great.
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 6:15 AM, Steve Scherr <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>  John--an alternative might be a feedback guide, helping judges
>> understand what types of
>>>  feedback you and others find useful.
>>>
>>>  In my experience as a judge (in another state), I made it a point
>> always to write some comments
>>>  down.  Very often they were of the form "Great job on XXX!  Think
>> about working on YYY in the
>>>  future."  It was hard to give more detailed feedback because of the
>> time constraints.  The things I
>>>  emphasized varied based on the type of judging I was doing, of course.
>>>
>>>  Would Listserv readers consider this type of feedback helpful, or do
>> coaches think that a variety of
>>>  more generic but wider-sweeping areas are better?  Examples:
>> enthusiasm, eye contact, right
>>>  volume, team member involvement, etc.?
>>>
>>>  Steve Scherr
>>  > Judge
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or CHANGE YOUR SETTINGS, please visit 
> https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-l.html and select "Join or 
> leave the list".
>
> If you want to join the VADCFLL-ADMIN-L mailing list - to which FLL 
> administrative announcements will be distributed - visit 
> https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-admin-l.html and select 
> "Join or leave the list".

-- 

John J. Barrett
Industrial Medium, Inc.
1616 Anderson Road
McLean, VA 22102

(c) 703-231-5094
(p) 703-286-0818
(f) 703-286-0888

http://www.industrialmedium.com

______________________________________________________________
To UNSUBSCRIBE or CHANGE YOUR SETTINGS, please visit https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-l.html and select "Join or leave the list".

If you want to join the VADCFLL-ADMIN-L mailing list - to which FLL administrative announcements will be distributed - visit https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-admin-l.html and select "Join or leave the list".

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.JMU.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager