At 11:45 PM -0500 11/23/08, [log in to unmask] wrote:
>...with absolutely no feedback on the three non-table aspects of
>FIRST, how is a team to have any idea how they performed?
>... the effectiveness of any test or competition is to have
>information whereby you can measure yourself.
>As it stands now, having experienced two Regionals and one State
>competition, our team is clueless as to how the judges evaluated our other
>three presentations. A simple check sheet based on the Rubics (without a
>numerical score) would be most helpful.
At the Sterling tournaments, the judges did, in fact, complete an
extensive and detailed one-page check-list of pros and cons. I don't
have those sheets in front of me, but I recall perhaps 20-25
check-boxes under both the pro and con categories, organized by
Rubric area. There was also a space at the bottom for written
comments. The coaches were handed those sheets at the same time the
kids were receiving their participation ribbons, leaving it up to us
when to review the notes and in what way to share them with the kids.
This was far more, and more detailed, feedback than we'd received in
previous years (those times there'd been a quarter-sheet form with
only a few broad-category check-boxes), and we are grateful to those
who composed the forms (was that you, Phil Smith?) and to the judges
for making good use of them. Larry, perhaps you could work with your
regional organizers to introduce such a practice next year.
2006 #4809 Nano People
2007 #1666 Power Bunnies
2008 #5013 BLT--Brilliant LEGO Team
To UNSUBSCRIBE or CHANGE YOUR SETTINGS, please visit https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-l.html and select "Join or leave the list".
If you want to join the VADCFLL-ADMIN-L mailing list - to which FLL administrative announcements will be distributed - visit https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-admin-l.html and select "Join or leave the list".