I wouldn't think that would matter.  The table is still supporting all its
weight.  If that was the case, then I think the rule would say it has to be
*touching* the table.  And it just says supporting all its weight.  So, I
would think that if the grocery units are in a jumble on the table, just
not with anything else holding them, then they would all count.

That is my interpretation, and I hope that's right!  :)  Hopefully Steve
will chime in.

Sonya in Harrisonburg

On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Heather Dyson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>
> Am I correct in that the groceries cannot be on top of other groceries on
> the table since it says the table has to support all its weight?
>
> Thanks!
> Heather Dyson
>  ------------------------------
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or CHANGE your settings, please visit
> https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-l.html and select "Join or
> leave the list".
> VADCFLL administrative announcements are sent via VADCFLL-ANNOUNCEMENTS-L.
> Visit https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-announcements-l.html to
> subscribe.

-- To UNSUBSCRIBE or CHANGE your settings, please visit https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-l.html and select "Join or leave the list".

-- VADCFLL administrative announcements are sent via VADCFLL-ANNOUNCEMENTS-L. Visit https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-ANNOUNCEMENTS-l.html to subscribe.