I wouldn't think that would matter. The table is still supporting all its weight. If that was the case, then I think the rule would say it has to be *touching* the table. And it just says supporting all its weight. So, I would think that if the grocery units are in a jumble on the table, just not with anything else holding them, then they would all count. That is my interpretation, and I hope that's right! :) Hopefully Steve will chime in. Sonya in Harrisonburg On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Heather Dyson <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Am I correct in that the groceries cannot be on top of other groceries on > the table since it says the table has to support all its weight? > > Thanks! > Heather Dyson > ------------------------------ > To UNSUBSCRIBE or CHANGE your settings, please visit > https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-l.html and select "Join or > leave the list". > VADCFLL administrative announcements are sent via VADCFLL-ANNOUNCEMENTS-L. > Visit https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-announcements-l.html to > subscribe. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE or CHANGE your settings, please visit https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-l.html and select "Join or leave the list". -- VADCFLL administrative announcements are sent via VADCFLL-ANNOUNCEMENTS-L. Visit https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-ANNOUNCEMENTS-l.html to subscribe.