I wouldn't think that would matter.  The table is still supporting all its weight.  If that was the case, then I think the rule would say it has to be *touching* the table.  And it just says supporting all its weight.  So, I would think that if the grocery units are in a jumble on the table, just not with anything else holding them, then they would all count.

That is my interpretation, and I hope that's right!  :)  Hopefully Steve will chime in.

Sonya in Harrisonburg

On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Heather Dyson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
 
Am I correct in that the groceries cannot be on top of other groceries on the table since it says the table has to support all its weight?
 
Thanks!
Heather Dyson
To UNSUBSCRIBE or CHANGE your settings, please visit https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-l.html and select "Join or leave the list".
VADCFLL administrative announcements are sent via VADCFLL-ANNOUNCEMENTS-L. Visit https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-announcements-l.html to subscribe.

To UNSUBSCRIBE or CHANGE your settings, please visit https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-l.html and select "Join or leave the list".
VADCFLL administrative announcements are sent via VADCFLL-ANNOUNCEMENTS-L. Visit https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-announcements-l.html to subscribe.