[log in to unmask]" type="cite">It is interesting to hear another perspective, since I took the same statement ["who...need help"] so differently. I have been working hard in two different classes this semester to bring (mostly white, mostly male) philosophy students around to more sympathetically reading arguments that all humans are dependent, that self-sufficiency is neither possible nor a desirable ideal, and that needing help is entirely compatible with having agency. So the idea at the core seems essentially correct to me. Kathryn J. Norlock Associate Professor of Philosophy St. Mary's College of Maryland 18952 E. Fisher Rd. St. Mary's City, MD 20686 240-895-4337 (ph) 240-895-4436 (fax) [log in to unmask] ________________________________ From: Feminist ethics and social theory on behalf of Emanuela Bianchi Sent: Thu 11/20/2008 9:55 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Feminism is simple? I find the following statement (among others) extremely problematic in the recently circulated SWIP-UK call for papers for the conference "Feminism Made Simple": " At [feminism's] core, it needs the idea that there are women, who are being harmed and need help." This gesture seems to repeat (as much recent transnational work has brought to our attention) stereotypes of women (possibly poor, disenfranchised, uneducated, domesticated, brown and black, duped and tricked) who are without agency and who require "our" (presumptively white, Western, neo-Imperialist, and "liberated") hand to lift them from their condition. On a day when the British Home Secretary has announced that paying for sex with illegally trafficked women will be treated as rape (thereby erasing any possibility of agency on the part of the sex worker), I find this statement particularly disturbing. A cursory glance at Chandra Mohanty's "Under Western Eyes" or recent work on the global sex industry such as Kamala Kempadoo and Joe Doezema' _Global Sex Workers: Rights, Resistance, and Redefinition_ or Laura Maria Agustin's _Sex at the Margins: Migration, Labour Markets and the Rescue Industry_ shows that the need for feminists in the academy to listen to and respond to subaltern voices is more pressing than ever. The necessity to attend to and respect the very epistemic marginality(ies?) we theorize as feminists is a far from simple matter. Best, Emma -- Emanuela Bianchi Visiting Assistant Professor Department of Philosophy Haverford College
Naomi Scheman, Professor of Philosophy and of Gender, Women's, & Sexuality Studies
Director of Graduate Studies in Feminist Studies
University of Minnesota
Philosophy Department, 801 Heller Hall, 271 19th Ave. S., Minneapolis MN 55455
612-625-3430, 612-626-8380 (fax), [log in to unmask]
http://www.philosophy.umn.edu/TrustworthyExpertise/home.html