It seems to me that there is a disconnect between what FLL states and what
happens at the tournament.  In reading the challenge this year the team was
suppose to identify a local change in climate and find possible solutions.
The materials provided from FLL suggest that the team's project would
represent the largest part of their score and that the robot and its
performance were of secondary importance.   

The tournament however is clearly focused on the robot.  The team scores
appeared to based mostly on robot design, programming, and table
performance.  The team's project seemed not to really count for much.  Of
the times the team met with the judges; one was for the robot programming
and design, three were the robot challenge at the table, one for a team
building exercise, and one two minute segment was for the presentation of
their project.  

Maybe there should be two types of tournaments where one is based on the
project and the other on the robot.  

George Dodd  








****** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If the recipient or reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail communication in error, please notify us immediately by sending
a reply e-mail message to the sender. Thank you.. This footnote confirms
that this email message has been scanned for the presence of computer
viruses. Appraise-Virginia






To UNSUBSCRIBE or CHANGE YOUR SETTINGS, please visit and select "Join or leave the list".

If you want to join the VADCFLL-ADMIN-L mailing list - to which FLL administrative announcements will be distributed - visit and select "Join or leave the list".