Scott Anderson's "Prostitution and Sexual Autonomy" (in *Ethics*), though it ultimately defends an abolitionist position, gives what I think is a clear, fair, and charitable account of the other side (which he calls the "normalization" view). I haven't used it in teaching, but my guess is that students could handle it with significant guidance. _____________________ Rebecca Whisnant Associate Professor of Philosophy Director of Women's and Gender Studies University of Dayton kmiriam <[log in to unmask]> Sent by: Feminist ethics and social theory <[log in to unmask]> 01/26/09 01:06 PM Please respond to kmiriam <[log in to unmask]> To [log in to unmask] cc Subject pro-prostitution or anti-regulation articles Hi For about a sophmore/junior Ethics class I am doing a unit on prostitution. I have the exchange between Carole Pateman and Lars Ericcson(sp?) and other excellent, theoretically solid abolitionist articles, so I would like to find something a bit more sophisticated than Ericcson's libertarian defense, and from a "feminist" perspective that argues against regulation, and/or for prostitution. I'm familiar with some of the material, but none of it seems philosophical or well argued. any suggestions? I want to introduce somewhat of a debate in the unit. Remember it's a sophmore level class- so nothing too dense. thanks in advance, Kathy Miriam [log in to unmask]