Hi All
I'm wondering if anyone might be able to suggest a few resources for me
on the ethics of analogies. I'm currently writing about how critics of
gamete donation often make strong use of an analogy to adoption in order
to draw out the moral issues they believe are salient. I'm critical of
this analogy for a number of reasons that extend beyond the issue of
aptness. Are there any good papers that consider how analogies (both in
their making and in their uptake) can appropriate and/or misrecognize
the experience of a group? I'm also struggling with what terminology to
use to describe what I find un-ethical about this analogy's use in
terms of both what it assumes or relies upon and what it seems to
accomplish/establish through its use. I'm not sure what to call the
kind of reinscription I see at the heart of the analogy and its use.
Thanks in advance for any assistance! I know it's a horribly busy time
of year, so ANY quick reference would be appreciated. You can reach me
via my personal
[log in to unmask] I'll happily post a
list of references to the group should I be able to gather one.
Warmest wishes,
Kim
--
Kimberly J. Leighton, PhD
Assistant Professor
Department of Philosophy and Religion
American University
121 Battelle Tompkins
4400 Massachusetts Avenue
Washington, DC 20016
ph 202-885-2415
fx 202-885-1094