Hi All############################
I'm wondering if anyone might be able to suggest a few resources for me on the ethics of analogies. I'm currently writing about how critics of gamete donation often make strong use of an analogy to adoption in order to draw out the moral issues they believe are salient. I'm critical of this analogy for a number of reasons that extend beyond the issue of aptness. Are there any good papers that consider how analogies (both in their making and in their uptake) can appropriate and/or misrecognize the experience of a group? I'm also struggling with what terminology to use to describe what I find un-ethical about this analogy's use in terms of both what it assumes or relies upon and what it seems to accomplish/establish through its use. I'm not sure what to call the kind of reinscription I see at the heart of the analogy and its use.
Thanks in advance for any assistance! I know it's a horribly busy time of year, so ANY quick reference would be appreciated. You can reach me via my personal [log in to unmask] I'll happily post a list of references to the group should I be able to gather one.
Warmest wishes,
Kim
--
Kimberly J. Leighton, PhD
Assistant Professor
Department of Philosophy and Religion
American University
121 Battelle Tompkins
4400 Massachusetts Avenue
Washington, DC 20016
ph 202-885-2415
fx 202-885-1094To unsubscribe from the FEAST-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: https://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=FEAST-L&A=1
To unsubscribe from the FEAST-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: https://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=FEAST-L&A=1