I strongly support Darcia's point of view. I think that we use a person's name as a hook on which to hang the illusion of consistency across situations and across time. Neither is accurate. One clinical observation is how anxiety problems sometimes resolve over decades. We don't observe that because we assume that any important changes will take place in 12 sessions, or some brief time.In another example, I'm working with a person who was ritualistically abused, but is now 60 and has done a lot of work. Her issues are not mostly those of abuse, but the ordinary problems of growing and adapting to life.

Jeffery Smith

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Darcia Narvaez <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Thanks, Steve!

The critiques of contextualism seem weak to me. They don't take into account developmental differences and changes through the lifespan (where some characteristics may be consistent for a time and then shift as the dynamism of development continues).

Further, the implicit assumption of the critique assumes that one can measure meaningful consistencies across time--sure but they are veneers of the dynamism of being a human being (unless a person has been toxically stressed/traumatized and oppressed into being robotic and rigid). Lots of information is lost in trying to categorize things one way or another.

Social cognitive theory of personality offers at least a remedy to thinking about personality consistency: rather than a trait carried situation to situation (as trait theory tends to assume), there is a consistent personality signature in a person by context variability across situations (e.g., extrovert with family, introvert at work).

But a virtuous person responds to each situation appropriately (e.g., with compassion and egolessness). Each situation is different so behavior is different each time. Holistic virtue cannot be measured in a controlled manner, since every situation is different and requires different skills/responses appropriate at that moment.

Darcia

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 9:03 AM, nysa71 <000000c289d6ba14-dmarc-[log in to unmask]> wrote:
So would Heraclitus be an example of a Contextualist considering quotes like:

"You could not step twice into the same river."

"
Everything changes and nothing stands still."

"
All entities move and nothing remains still."

?

~ Jason Bessey

On Sunday, January 28, 2018, 10:28:02 PM EST, Steven Quackenbush <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


Hello ToK Community,

Attached is the penultimate episode of Stephen Pepper's World Hypotheses.  
Included as a special bonus feature is an optional "deleted scene"! 

~ Steve Q.  

############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:TOK-SOCIETY-L-SIGNOFF-R[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1

############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:TOK-SOCIETY-L-SIGNOFF-R[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1




--
############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:TOK-SOCIETY-L-SIGNOFF-[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1


############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1