Jason,
  I don’t disagree that privilege is an important concept to reflect on. I have led many diversity workshops and am well-versed in unpacking white male privilege. It is important to do so and to be “woke” to these dynamics. And, as you are suggesting, when I look across the landscape at large, I see many folks who are woefully unaware of such dynamics, which is a problem and one that I have been aware of and committed to sense the late 1980s when I became immersed in feminism.

  However, IMO, there are also important pockets with certain left leaning circles (e.g., social science/humanities departments in the academy to name one such circle) that the emphasis and framing “overshoots,” and everything becomes focused on the embodiment of race, maleness, and heteronormativity in a socially constructed milieu.

  I see it as a complicated dialectic.

Best,
G

Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

From: nysa71<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 2, 2018 3:23 PM
To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Interesting David Brooks Article


Gregg,

I think the key is simply recognizing that there are some things that we as "white males" won't have to deal with because of being "white" and "male". That's the privilege.

An example that comes to mind is when my former sister-in-law went for a job interview at a local paper mill several years ago. She and my brother had recently had a child. The interviewer asked her, "But who's going to watch the baby when your working?" My stunned sister-in-law said, "Um...a daycare provider or her father".

A man would never have to worry about being asked such a ridiculous and patronizing (and certainly illegal!) question. Just one "male privilege" we have.

I don't think I have to worry nearly as much about police brutality as a black person does. That's one example of my "white privilege".

It's not recognizing these sorts of things which contributes to an oppressive system of "the Other". We can't fix problems we don't recognize.

~ Jason Bessey
On Tuesday, January 2, 2018, 1:42:48 PM EST, Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx <[log in to unmask]> wrote:



I guess the issue is whether the point regarding oppression is being minimized by Brooks or if it is being exaggerated by others.



I certainly find myself in contexts in the university academy where I feel folks are over-emphasizing white male oppression.



And it is too easy for someone to hear me voice that and then state that I must be saying that because I am a privileged white male and am blinded by self-serving motives (an accusation that has been leveled against me).



G



Sent from Mail<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__go.microsoft.com_fwlink_-3FLinkId-3D550986&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=0KFgY-zVOy-_xZDC-N2N857SrhXjj7Ro24LkaK9HGFE&s=0-2m41E0_hFqLwkIHGovb1FLkx0kDLAjipu96e7rjpg&e=> for Windows 10



From: nysa71<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 2, 2018 1:36 PM
To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Interesting David Brooks Article



Gregg,

I'm all for heterodoxy. It's very much needed. And nothing wrong with different political viewpoints. But I was criticizing Brooke's minimization of oppression, and his whole strawman that identifying oppression necessarily means that one's "goodness is secure", that one has "virtue without obligation", and that "nothing is one's fault". (Just because someone is "oppressed" doesn't mean they can't be a bad, non-virtuous person who has a lot of things happen to them that is their fault.)

I found it to be a very self-serving article by a neoliberal, white male-privileged media elitist who down-played neo-liberalism, white male privilege, and media elitism and the contributions these things make to the very systemic and institutional oppression that he's minimizing.

Indeed, it's ironic that he was engaging in a "tribalism" of his own by so easily criticizing the "oppressed herd" without considering the possibility that he himself could be part of the "oppressor herd".

~ Jason

On Tuesday, January 2, 2018, 12:44:02 PM EST, Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx <[log in to unmask]> wrote:



Jason,

  You don’t see any validity to his point?



  I find myself resonating with it. I am a member of the Heterodox Academy (https://heterodoxacademy.org/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__heterodoxacademy.org_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=s7E6hU5UlYFY6gQijMvYR9Mz6wxlYSVWfmXVz1QJn0k&s=uh229-o5-tXpnuGbbkiKdhuytlc8z-cRd4aF7L77q9Q&e=>), which is concerned with the lack of political viewpoint diversity in the academy.

G



Sent from Mail<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__go.microsoft.com_fwlink_-3FLinkId-3D550986&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=s7E6hU5UlYFY6gQijMvYR9Mz6wxlYSVWfmXVz1QJn0k&s=N4CzN_8NJQQlTQDd_wX6fHGMv0ZDIVWlwUZAPaMWgxk&e=> for Windows 10



From: nysa71<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 2, 2018 11:51 AM
To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Interesting David Brooks Article



"The easiest way to do that is to tell a tribal oppressor/oppressed story and build your own innocence on your status as victim. Just about everybody can find a personal victim story. Once you’ve identified your herd’s oppressor — the neoliberal order, the media elite, white males, whatever — your goodness is secure. You have virtue without obligation. Nothing is your fault."

Well, we do in fact live in a world of oppression, though it's more "top vs down" than "left vs. right". How convenient, though, that that would be minimized by a white male media elitist and neoliberal apologist. I guess that way, he can have virtue without obligation and nothing is the fault of his herd. [Emoji]

~ Jason Bessey
On Tuesday, January 2, 2018, 10:47:17 AM EST, Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx <[log in to unmask]> wrote:



I found this to be a thoughtful article by David Brooks. I find my own life mission oriented toward contributing to conversation and visions having to do with (re)constructing a broader, deeper, wiser global worldview.



https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/01/opinion/the-retreat-to-tribalism.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-left-region&region=opinion-c-col-left-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-left-region<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.nytimes.com_2018_01_01_opinion_the-2Dretreat-2Dto-2Dtribalism.html-3Faction-3Dclick-26pgtype-3DHomepage-26clickSource-3Dstory-2Dheading-26module-3Dopinion-2Dc-2Dcol-2Dleft-2Dregion-26region-3Dopinion-2Dc-2Dcol-2Dleft-2Dregion-26WT.nav-3Dopinion-2Dc-2Dcol-2Dleft-2Dregion&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=HMLUi7Owr7FINbhMMGiMiE7bJs2PWgNXZkkr4Aono5o&s=uT5I3J9qeSDfjEnYsFWE0ueGRjP9GwshnRJb2yyq778&e=>



Best,

Gregg



Sent from Mail<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__go.microsoft.com_fwlink_-3FLinkId-3D550986&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=HMLUi7Owr7FINbhMMGiMiE7bJs2PWgNXZkkr4Aono5o&s=eU2LKkDLGh8ux4-sMzDnTRvOd5w4fTkysVWl8R-cvg4&e=> for Windows 10



############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]> or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1

############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]> or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1

############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]> or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1

############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]> or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1

############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]> or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1

############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]> or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1

############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1