Hi Joe,

 

  I was having my own interesting parallel world reality. Yesterday was a reading day and I finished two books I had started at the beach. One was Origin Story: A Big History of Everything, which is David Christian’s new book summarizing the Big History view of reality. It remains in pretty similar form. It is a time by complexity view of the universe that allows one to see interrelationships between the sciences by understanding the complexity territory they map. And, it still is completely missing both psychology and philosophy/theory of knowledge.

 

  The other book was Hillbilly Elegy: A Memoir of a Family and Culture in Crisis by J.D. Vance. In case you did not catch it, it was a very powerful book on the lifestyle of poor/lower class working whites in Appalachia by a man who “made it out” and graduated from Yale Law School.

 

  The distance between these book was remarkable in many ways. And yet, I felt the vision of our ToK society would be a place that could connect them in a meaningful way.

 

  I think we need to hit a reset button in this age of accelerating information and think seriously about consolidating knowledge in a way that points toward a vision for cultivating wisdom.


Best,

Gregg

   

 

From: tree of knowledge system discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Joseph Michalski
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 8:59 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Interesting Parallel Discovery

 

Dear Colleagues:

 

I understand everyone has busy intellectual agendas, but I thought I'd share an interesting parallel discovery from the past weekend (beyond the recent discovery of neutrinos from a distant galaxy!). My wife and I were flying back from England, reading next to each other on the plane. I was reading Roberto Unger and Lee Smolin's The Singular Universe and the Reality of Time as part of my efforts to understand the cosmos and our broader TOK mission. My wife, who's a Sufi Muslim, was reading Sadegh Angha's (41st Sufi Master) The Hidden Angles of Life in her efforts to understand the cosmos from a religious worldview. Here's what we were reading at the same time from our respective books:

 

Joe, the scientist, read on p. 8: “If, however, everything is time-bound (a key argument of the book), that principle must apply as well to the laws, symmetries, and constants of nature. There are then no timeless regularities capable of underwriting our causal judgments. Change changes. It is not just the phenomena that change; so do the regularities: the laws, symmetries, and supposed constants of nature.”

 

Farnaz, the spiritualist, read on p. xi: “(T)he laws of physics are fundamentally and essentially variable (for example, there is much evidence and documentation that most of the constant principles of nature and those influenced by gravity are in fact not constant). Existence itself is in motion.” (emphasis in the original)

 

Just some food for future thought. If I arrive at any great insights from all of this, I'll be happy to share. At the same time, perhaps others on the list have had their own "a-ha" moments in terms of understanding the evolving nature of the universe, the constancy of change, and the implications that nature's laws might best be viewed from a cosmological, historical perspective. Yours kindly, -Joe

 

Dr. Joseph H. Michalski

Associate Academic Dean

King’s University College at Western University

266 Epworth Avenue

London, Ontario, Canada  N6A 2M3

Tel: (519) 433-3491, ext. 4439

Fax: (519) 433-0353

Email: [log in to unmask]

______________________

eið + 1 = 0

 

############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1

############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1