Print

Print


I can appreciate the comments here. Judging the project for FLL is hard. Especially when you consider that all of the judges are volunteers and may not have any experience in the area that is being presented. Even if they had an actual astronaut as one of the judges, that wouldn't necessarily help at all if the team's project was about a piece of equipment to use on Mars to help with mining oxygen or minerals. Astronauts don't necessarily get training in mining. But that's not the point. You shouldn't need an expert to evaluate the presentation. Nor should you expect one. Look at the rubric. No where does it say, "How perfect is the idea? Is the idea ready for deployment?". It would definitely take an expert to make that assessment. Instead, the judges are looking to see if they did an appropriate amount of research. Is the solution clearly explained? Is there demonstrated added value with your idea? Was there a systematic approach taken by the team over the course of the research and presentation development? Again, look at the rubric and be sure that your presentation covers everything on it.

So, what do you do as a coach?

Explain to the team that the judges are volunteers, and you may not get a judge that knows anything about what you are presenting. So, you need to present to a level that any fifth grader could understand. If you are using special terms or concepts, explain them clearly in your presentation. Test your presentation on multiple audiences, especially with people that you can trust to give you honest, critical feedback. Keep finding new audiences to share with in order to assess if changes actually result in an improvement in clarity. It should be completely and perfectly clear to everyone what problem you are trying to solve, and what your proposed solution is. If your test audiences don't fully understand what you are trying to accomplish, then maybe you are attempting too much? You may need to address a smaller part of your problem. 

Finally, be on the lookout for your own experts. Ask them the questions I wrote above. "How perfect is our idea? Is our idea ready for deployment?". Put the feedback from that in your presentation and tell the judges what the experts think. You may have done that in your presentation, but I am including it here for completeness.

Skip Morrow

.


On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 8:41 AM Frank Levine <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
We were in the same boat.  Our experts (including a former NASA administrator) all liked our solution and said that it was clear that the kids had really researched and understood the problem.  The judges rated everything... quality of research, knowledge of the problem, and innovation in the "developing" column.  The comments on the rubric clearly indicate that the judges didn't understand the problem, nor did they understand the solution that the team presented.  I have judged for the project in prior years... I get it.  It's not easy.  That said, it's hard to explain the disconnect to the kids.

-Frank



On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 8:07 PM Sreeni Konanki <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

My point here is not to blame judges, but asking the judges to be judicious about their skills and what they can judge and what they cannot when given a judging event which they don't have a clue about. Yes we did get a rookie judge team which had no clue about. Misjudging can disappoint any team that gets affected. 
Request to the organizers while assigning events (Project/robot/core values) to the judge volunteers, to atleast put one experienced with a rookie and not both rookies. I could see our judges during the event and their face clearly tells they had no clue. Kids presented their project and solution to experts and they all got appreciation. 
While I understand judges are volunteers and humans, sometimes having inexperienced judges and no knowledge on the topic can be really hurting. Its not sour grapes (we have been to states and won awards earlier, so winning an award is not a point at all). Point here is the feedback given shows that the judges were not paying attention to the presentation at all (which I noticed during their questions, as they were asking questions that were already clearly explained and also given a handout the bio's of the experts they showed their solution). 

It was clearly visible from the feedback that our team were not judged correctly (even judging correctly may not have changed the outcome) and kids were completely let down after they saw the feedback from the judges for the project. They have done a lot of research and the subject on the space radiation is huge, One comment was that the solution was not original, explains it all they didn't have a clue what the solution was.   

So long mail is not to change the outcome of the event. But, an effort for other teams not to get affected by misjudging and inexperience. This is not to hurt feelings of volunteers who are doing excellent job, but suggestion to make things better.

Thanks,
Sreeni Konanki
Team Geminids - 23731

To UNSUBSCRIBE or CHANGE your settings, please visit https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-l.html and select "Join or leave the list".
VADCFLL administrative announcements are sent via VADCFLL-ANNOUNCEMENTS-L. Visit https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-announcements-l.html to subscribe.

To UNSUBSCRIBE or CHANGE your settings, please visit https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-l.html and select "Join or leave the list".
VADCFLL administrative announcements are sent via VADCFLL-ANNOUNCEMENTS-L. Visit https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-announcements-l.html to subscribe.

To UNSUBSCRIBE or CHANGE your settings, please visit https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-l.html and select "Join or leave the list".
VADCFLL administrative announcements are sent via VADCFLL-ANNOUNCEMENTS-L. Visit https://listserv.jmu.edu/archives/vadcfll-announcements-l.html to subscribe.