John/Gregg: This is *classic* . . . !! John is PRINT and Gregg is ELECTRIC. Two different "sensibilities." How could they possibly "agree" on anything . . . ?? The irony, of course, is that this is only happening because they are *both* now obsolete. Both distantly in the "rear-view mirror." Both looking backwards. From an ELECTRIC standpoint, we all have different "language systems." From a PRINT standpoint, we can actually try to sort all this out -- "scientifically." In both cases, the underlying "biases" are masked. Neither standpoints recognizes that fundamentally different psycho-technological environments are at work. And neither will those who participate in the "Canonizer" game. Crucially, neither wants to admit that DIGITAL brings a completely different sensibility to the "debate." Yes, this is classic . . . <g> Mark P.S. The irony is that a "Canon" isn't either PRINT or ELECTRIC. And it cannot be decided by a "vote." It is SCRIBAL -- as in "Canon Law." What a world of surprises awaits us all. https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wikipedia.org_wiki_Canon-5Flaw&d=DwIBaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=liZu1PIudVuCGmjsE9GbqAYr0y2OqjrUURySMh9-XlQ&s=6LaimFVFrpAJE-fcNiRoxup3P4z-C3rLwB9vJpzG8jg&e= ############################ To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1