Mark: It is not my place to define your terms. I am simply asking, using your words, what is it, in your view, “what digital brings to the debate.” I am interested in understanding your perception. Particularly as you posed digital as bringing a “completely different sensibility” to the debate, where the implication is the difference between scribal and electric. I don’t believe I fully understand your conception in this matter. Best regards, Waldemar Waldemar A Schmidt, PhD, MD (Perseveret et Percipiunt) 503.631.8044 Strive not to be a success, but rather to be of value. (A Einstein) > On Mar 12, 2019, at 5:31 AM, Mark Stahlman <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Waldemar: > > Sure. But first you will have to "succinctly state" what a *sensibility* might be . . . <g> > > To help with that, you might refer to the post I have just made responding to Brett. I look forward to following this through to a meaningful conclusion. > > Mark > > Quoting Waldemar Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>: > >> Mark: >> >> If you would, please, succinctly state the “completely different sensibility” which digital “brings to the debate.” >> >> Waldemar A Schmidt, PhD, MD >> (Perseveret et Percipiunt) >> 503.631.8044 >> >> Strive not to be a success, but rather to be of value. (A Einstein) > > ############################ > > To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: > write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] > or click the following link: > http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 > ############################ To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1