Mark:

It is not my place to define your terms.
I am simply asking, using your words, what is it, in your view, “what digital brings to the debate.”
I am interested in understanding your perception.
Particularly as you posed digital as bringing a “completely different sensibility” to the debate, where the implication is the difference between scribal and electric.
I don’t believe I fully understand your conception in this matter.

Best regards,

Waldemar






Waldemar A Schmidt, PhD, MD
(Perseveret et Percipiunt)
503.631.8044

Strive not to be a success, but rather to be of value. (A Einstein)

On Mar 12, 2019, at 5:31 AM, Mark Stahlman <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Waldemar:

Sure.  But first you will have to "succinctly state" what a *sensibility* might be . . . <g>

To help with that, you might refer to the post I have just made responding to Brett.  I look forward to following this through to a meaningful conclusion.

Mark

Quoting Waldemar Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>:

Mark:

If you would, please, succinctly state the “completely different sensibility” which digital “brings to the debate.”

Waldemar A Schmidt, PhD, MD
(Perseveret et Percipiunt)
503.631.8044

Strive not to be a success, but rather to be of value. (A Einstein)

############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1


############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1