Cory, On balance, religion, or I should say religiosity also acts as a safety valve; if all of the deferred and imagined conflicts had to be resolved this time around, we'd be living in the Game of Thrones. On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 5:51 AM Cory David Barker < [log in to unmask]> wrote: > I'm with you on this. > > Also, I'd like to include the impact of religion in the western world. > Christianity has a self-destruction motif in most sects of Christianity. > They believe that this world is doomed to fail, that a rapture or > armageddon will occur, and God will sort it all out. They believe they hold > positions of power and wealth on God selecting them. Everything good that > happens to them is God and everything against them is a devil trying to > sway them from the correct path. This effectively ignores science, facts, > and wagers the future survival on invisible forces. They believe they will > go to a heaven or paradise, those who stand up to them will go to hell or > get eternal punishment, and believe the destruction of the world is gods > will. This underpins what we are dealing with: people tryong to put the > entire world on a cross to kill it. > > Cory > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020, 10:29 AM James Lyons-Weiler < > [log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> Cory, >> >> Thank you. >> >> "Its has become corrupted". >> >> Yes, worth knowing by what. In my view the corporatist influence must be >> minimized. >> >> Here is a diagram I rendered last year showing The New Left and the New >> Right which pulls aside the curtain to reveal that and how the D party and >> the R party will exist into perpetuity regardless of "Democracy" (which we >> do not have), State-Owned Corporatism, or Corporate-Owned Statism. >> >> [image: The New Right2.jpg] >> >> Due to de-regulation, partisan politics has become an agent of corporate >> interests; >> corporations have captured the regulatory agencies, and Soviet-style >> committee bosses >> outlast presidents. >> >> Bureaucrats and in-line accountants have more job stability and >> accumulate more >> influence and power than the 'doers'. The survival of the cabal becomes >> far more >> relevant in terms of operations than any over-arching concern for >> societal well-being. >> >> Corporations, being by necessity, and by law amoral, must operate to >> foster their own >> survival Governments have a mandate to keep the nation but have not >> mandate to >> survive unto themselves. Parliamentary dissolution and re-negotiation of >> cabinets >> and entire governments may be expected to be more resilient and >> inoculated against corporatist >> corruptive influences, but they are not. >> >> We live in corporatist fascist states in which overt fascism is masked by >> puppets of corporations >> that call themselves politicians who answer not to principles, but to >> platform, dictated by >> their sponsors. >> >> I owe these insights to the research done in preparation of and while >> writing "Cures Vs. Profits", >> confirmed by my conscription into overt activism for objective science on >> the steps and in the halls >> of state capitals around the country, with politicians in deed and in >> word echoing the fraudulent >> talking points of their corporatist masters. >> >> Events caught on camera changing votes due to whispered words coming down >> from party bosses, >> leaving the people's true liberties and freedoms in the dustbin... Pick >> your poison, the right is paid for >> policies and laws tolerant of toxins in the air, water, food, and soils, >> the nouveau-rich left tolerates them >> in medicine, shanghai'd by their penchant for lifting up the downtrodden, >> for the greater good, which >> masterfully being beaten into the minds of Americans right now with the >> non-science-based universal >> and outdoors masking nonsense. Not the place for specific debate, but >> the art of social programming >> is so much clearer after a handful of blue pills. >> >> Thank you for suffering my diatribes in the search for a name that >> captures the exigencies of our time. >> >> For me, it's corporatism. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020, 10:45 AM Cory David Barker < >> [log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >>> Democracy is already a stage higher than meta systematic, its >>> paradigmatic. Metamodernism has become spinning wheels. Yes, more people >>> are getting inetrested in understanding that we need to go beyond left and >>> right, but metamodernism is not any more complex than democracy. >>> Metamodernism is what democracy already was, going beyond left and right >>> (or going beyond the multiplicity of parties such as in Austria) to have a >>> rule of governance and a way of life that is as satisfiable as possible to >>> the most people. Metamodernism is basically just rediscovering the >>> democratic ideals. But democracy does not work because there are always >>> people who corrupt it. Similarly, just like what happened with democracy, >>> so too is happening with metamodernity, it is fracturing. >>> >>> The United Nations was supposed to be cross paradigmatic, it was >>> supposed to synthesize together across nations, it was supposed to uphold >>> universal human rights. And what has happened? It has become corrupted. We >>> need to go beyond the metacultural to find a solution. Metacultural >>> solutions are building blocks towards but not the overall solution itself. >>> What happens in democracy is proof. >>> >>> I mostly agree with Gregg's 5th joint point, but I do not believe we >>> should be calling it meta. It will not be democracy, but it will build on >>> its (and other forms of governance) best traits. It will be something we've >>> never seen before. >>> >>> C. >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020, 7:35 AM James Lyons-Weiler < >>> [log in to unmask]> wrote: >>> >>>> Cory, >>>> Thank you for this. >>>> >>>> Complex systems such as you described can succinctly be represented and >>>> modeled and explicitly simulated when the maths become intractable. >>>> >>>> Let's revisit that in a brief moment. >>>> >>>> I'll risk capturing the issue succinctly: we do not know if how are are >>>> governed, and how we govern, are even close to optimal in their structure, >>>> form and >>>> processes. We do know that we are not well-governed due to corruption >>>> of an otherwise largely sufficient government process solution. >>>> >>>> Isn't it an obvious feature of human societies that when leadership >>>> fails, they are replaced by those who seek harmony through leadership? >>>> >>>> Yet in spite of that nature of mankind, we have persistent pathologies, >>>> for reasons you describe. >>>> >>>> Here are my thoughts. We need society-level metacognition processes >>>> focused on optimizing process solutions; Gregg's ToK is attractive in that >>>> it provides a framework for discussion of systems at different levels, >>>> their commonalities and differences. It illuminates possibilities >>>> without imposing constraint to one temporally parochial "other-than" >>>> process solution. >>>> >>>> In contrast, the Magna Carta, the US Declaration of Independence, the >>>> Communist Manifesto and Mein Kampf were all dangerous (to the >>>> 'establishment' at the time) because they begat awareness in individuals >>>> that as a collective they have the power to empower others on their behalf >>>> in a different way. Individuals respond to pledges of loyalty, fealty, and >>>> Unity in a common bond of "us-ness"; we emotionally surrender a past state >>>> of relatedness to a new one, >>>> and we pledge our wealth and send our sons and daughters on behalf of >>>> that spoken and adopted unity. >>>> >>>> Let's presume that some of the obvious assumptions inherent in the >>>> model you referenced we are discussing are correct: >>>> >>>> -That "the system" i.e., human societies are inherently, of necessity, >>>> and optimally hierarchical >>>> -That people acting at their own level of self-interest at every phase >>>> can, in fact yield a sustainable governance >>>> -That a minority can solve the issue on behalf of the majority >>>> >>>> Carrying in our present context, I've looked in Game B a bit, just >>>> dabbling, and more into Unity2020, and I appreciate deeply the need to >>>> optimize >>>> quickly toward AI vs. human conflict and "move beyond" Game A >>>> human:human conflict. Tendrils of Game A however are obvious even in >>>> the truism that a motive for Game B is that Game A has not served us >>>> sufficiently well. To me, Unity2020 will eventually fall under the plow >>>> due to the corrupting influences of >>>> corporate campaign funding. So let's presume that Unity2020 is a >>>> temporally parochial defined process reactionary, not proactively optimized >>>> solution because >>>> the broken pieces that eroded both parties in the US remain (this need >>>> not be true if, as party, corporatist influences are *better contained* >>>> ). >>>> >>>> An individual has human-recognized options, such as stoicism, or >>>> religion, which attribute responsibility outside of their >>>> locus of control; both are palliative and keep the ego intact via the >>>> belief by the individual they are submitting to something >>>> greater than themselves. At a societal level, to date, conformity to a >>>> man-made power entity backed by the threat of force >>>> has been the path to peaceful coexistence within societies. >>>> Pathological overreach for control of one society over another >>>> (even if mostly for resources) leads to the mutual application of force >>>> (war). >>>> >>>> "Government" is a form of metacognition for societies. Our society >>>> mentality has any number of pathologies. >>>> >>>> You wrote: "..(A)lmost all of the participants in economic, political, >>>> and corporate systems who can perform meta systematically, are stuck in the >>>> negation or oscillation transition step, which is what metamodernism is an >>>> attempt to help solve." >>>> >>>> I love this sentence. Highly illuminating. Spot-on. >>>> >>>> What we lack, and what the forward-thinking simulations needed to >>>> identify process solutions that can help us move from one place to the next. >>>> >>>> Safely. >>>> With prosperity for all. >>>> And (real) health for all. >>>> >>>> Should the new enlightenment include the high utility of prescient >>>> modeling, millions of equally optimal process solutions may be identified. >>>> >>>> I had a discussion with someone close to me which "went well" for the >>>> first time in years because I told him that in my mind, I was replacing >>>> comparatively short-sight, subjective (experienced-based) culturally >>>> parochial "principles", "norms", "mores" and "ethos" with a "search for >>>> optimal >>>> process solutions". >>>> >>>> Such a shift de-escalates the perceived threats over what otherwise >>>> could be perceived as a threat to one's "identity" and what "one stands >>>> for". >>>> >>>> It helps people remember that support "for Trump" or "for Biden" is an >>>> adoption of a different constellation of process solutions, some of which >>>> are "optimized" for >>>> the benefit of particular subgroups in society. >>>> >>>> We have the ability and computational power to model (simulate) the >>>> entire world with agent-based simulations; they are used to help route >>>> traffic patterns, to optimize design of large hospitals, etc. but they are >>>> not used to optimize rules and regulations, or how societies are structured. >>>> >>>> I'd love to see an arm of the new enlightenment adopt the task of >>>> modeling societies as multi-layered processes on well-defined humanist >>>> optimization >>>> functions if only to find answers to meta-questions on the landscape of >>>> solutions such as "how many way are there to structure a government that >>>> are equally optimal" (for the sake of knowing) with the residual answer to >>>> the footnote: "where does our current system lie on that landscape of >>>> optimized solutions"? >>>> >>>> I would begin with agrarian societies, and modeling societies and >>>> nation-states from around the world every 100 years or so. Where could >>>> German have gone instead in 1933, for example? >>>> >>>> For the present day, once we know the landscape of optimal and >>>> suboptimal process solutions, the question then becomes; what do we do >>>> about them? That becomes less academic and more political. As a tool, of >>>> course, interested parties could adopt this approach as a means to their >>>> selfish ends, and thus the tail we thought we lost in evolution wraps >>>> around the branch once more... >>>> >>>> JLW >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 12:25 AM Cory David Barker < >>>> [log in to unmask]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> The model of hierarchical complexity is a mathematical behavior model >>>>> that defines discreet orders (also called stages) of increasing behavioral >>>>> complexity. Each order of complexity is produced by the coordination of two >>>>> or more actions at the previous order. The orders are domain-general, >>>>> universal forms of behavior. There are 8 transition steps between each >>>>> stage, and they are for fractally identical. And yes, it does apply at all >>>>> building blocks of social organization, although the calculus to adequately >>>>> represent it becomes profoundly complex. >>>>> >>>>> It is primarily quantitative, not qualitative and therefore not >>>>> analogy based. However, analogies can be made in so far as an order of >>>>> hierarchical complexity has been identified to be the same between two or >>>>> more behaviors, so the characteristics that are shared between those >>>>> behaviors can be related. >>>>> >>>>> The paper explicitly articulate the fundamental behavioral complexity >>>>> required to resolve the current issues that are occurring right now. The >>>>> problem is, most people hit a ceiling at formal or systematic stage, and in >>>>> order for people to resolve the issues, they need to be no less then meta >>>>> systematic stage, which consists of about 5% of the population. This is >>>>> because the solution requires the coordination and synthesis of homomorphic >>>>> principles that govern systems. >>>>> >>>>> Democracy was designed specifically for this purpose, for people to >>>>> come together from different perspectives and design, append, and amend >>>>> higher order principles (laws) to govern systems. Unfortunately, the >>>>> systems have been corrupted. This is because almost all of the participants >>>>> in economic, political, and corporate systems who can perform meta >>>>> systematically, are stuck in the negation or oscillation transition steps, >>>>> which is what metamodernism is an attempt to help solve. >>>>> >>>>> You cannot resolve the corruption directly. It does not work. Corrupt >>>>> organizations consist of people who will understand your method for trying >>>>> to prevent their corruption, and they will adapt to stop you. >>>>> Anti-corruption only put Band-Aids on a larger problem. The paper I >>>>> limetnked works, but only if you can get people to sit at the same table in >>>>> good faith. And we don't see it happen very often. We need something more >>>>> to solve these problems, but we don't have it yet. >>>>> >>>>> C. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020, 1:19 AM James Lyons-Weiler < >>>>> [log in to unmask]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you Cory, theirs (Sonnert & Commons') is a analogy-based >>>>>> general theoretical framework but I'm afraid in my view it falls >>>>>> short (as all analogies and models do to some extent) because it >>>>>> attempts to apply and extend a model developed to understand >>>>>> an aspect of the developing human brain, which society is not, and >>>>>> thus is cannot succeed in providing much more >>>>>> than a descriptive framework. >>>>>> >>>>>> RIght now, I'm more along the lines of "If we are asked to hang those >>>>>> responsible, who are they, and what do we call them" (hanging being a >>>>>> metaphor) and "once the king is dead, who shall be king (if anyone), >>>>>> and how shall we live"? And "do we want to be informed or participate?" >>>>>> >>>>>> Take Greenspan's awakening, for example. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.theguardian.com_business_2008_oct_24_economics-2Dcreditcrunch-2Dfederal-2Dreserve-2Dgreenspan&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=MGphR359a7quy3SrHxyaw9QNOlkjTc1XD3iAxr8khiQ&s=cbEYRfqg9skyVTKuRICqdCw7wGrpD_yTDbek9vmUUDk&e= >>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.theguardian.com_business_2008_oct_24_economics-2Dcreditcrunch-2Dfederal-2Dreserve-2Dgreenspan&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=D-9ZbkJ3UKJEqsE3Xl0MZ4WVjgIoHLzqIgKsT1Zylng&s=_d3QKD3iGMOSBKKVcI4PDm2FY7wggfASObJQ1wc65K8&e=> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> How could a society structure its economy on a model of infinite >>>>>> growth in the first place? >>>>>> A presumption that based on interest in one's own resources, one >>>>>> would take good care of them and shepherd them well - with no >>>>>> built-in safe guard for someone to sound an alarm, and practiced >>>>>> routine of changed behavior that would allow a gentle >>>>>> slide into a recession. We don't have any such safeguards, and this >>>>>> is why in 2008 I called and wrote to Hank Paulson (Sec. >>>>>> Treasury) from my office at the University of Pittsburgh the Friday >>>>>> before Black Monday, pleading for him to use all >>>>>> carrot and no stick, lest a lending freeze hold the bail-out money >>>>>> for months. My solution was a sliding scale incentive plan: >>>>>> The lower the interest rate banks offered to consumers, the larger >>>>>> the size of the bailout a bank could obtain, and the better >>>>>> the terms of the payback (longer terms, lower interest) to the Fed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Equitably incentivized transactions at such times would appear to me >>>>>> to dictate such terms - not further trust in >>>>>> the survival instincts of drowning institutions. >>>>>> >>>>>> Paulson ignored my pleas, instead he forced banks to accept bail-out >>>>>> they did not need to "legitimize" the loans. >>>>>> >>>>>> The banks froze for 3 three months, and millions lost their homes. >>>>>> >>>>>> The absence of creative thought in economic modeling - in spite of >>>>>> trillions of dollars worth of computers and software in which >>>>>> simulations could be run to find good outcomes - to me an example of >>>>>> is symptomatic of a larger pathology; parameterizing a strategy (and its >>>>>> models) to an end that serves as a means to its own ends *because >>>>>> doing so sanctifies the authority*. >>>>>> >>>>>> As base as that may seem, Left and Right have no meaning if their >>>>>> shuffling of platforms are based on >>>>>> multivariate versions of "Split the country and take the bigger >>>>>> half", which they are. They are based on projections of surrogate outcomes >>>>>> (elections) not long-term health of the country, economy, etc. I'm >>>>>> convinced the two parties would survive quite well side by >>>>>> side regardless of the type of economy or (nearly) government that >>>>>> ruled the US. >>>>>> >>>>>> So who is culpable for not imagining and sharing such better ways? >>>>>> Surely they have been imagined? >>>>>> >>>>>> Is it the drama players themselves? >>>>>> The witting and unwitting electorate? >>>>>> >>>>>> Are there meta-influences who ride the ebbing political waves like an >>>>>> investor >>>>>> who knows how to make money when the stock market both rises and >>>>>> falls? >>>>>> >>>>>> Or do societies flail - and fail - from the emergent properties of >>>>>> self-serving nature of humans, who see fit to limit >>>>>> themselves to conformed mold? >>>>>> >>>>>> Something else? >>>>>> >>>>>> Does for-profit medicine lead to medical injuries being the 3rd >>>>>> leading cause of death by institutional negligence, or >>>>>> personal callous disregard? More importantly - what do we do NOW to >>>>>> address it? >>>>>> >>>>>> Reflect for a moment on why we so thoroughly enmesh our identities >>>>>> with our positions, and why are we not warned (and do not warn those >>>>>> we mentor) that to do so means risk of suffering an unwarranted >>>>>> crisis should your position change? >>>>>> >>>>>> I imagine that there are many, many axes of morality - defined by >>>>>> their ability to render useful and not harmful process solutions, which >>>>>> sit right before us, but to which we are blinded by our socialization >>>>>> and education: >>>>>> >>>>>> *-Conformity to the majority* >>>>>> *-Appeal to (or deference) to authority* >>>>>> *-Vague, inexact or unestimated "greater good" cost/benefit >>>>>> calculations * >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm sure everyone can extend this list of behaviors that become >>>>>> "default mode" operations that may have worked >>>>>> optimally in our tribal and small village past. >>>>>> >>>>>> But now, we confuse "principles" with "process solutions". >>>>>> Principles are subjective and experience-based, and >>>>>> often outmoded by a rapidly changing world. >>>>>> >>>>>> Principles are held onto dearly, and in staying with them are left >>>>>> unscathed by later-life experience. >>>>>> >>>>>> Process solutions are continuously optimized via intelligence and >>>>>> tested by objective empirical evidence. >>>>>> >>>>>> "Principles" can collide and cause societal conflict. "Process >>>>>> solutions" cannot collide, they can only enmesh and adjust to each >>>>>> other toward some optimal solution. >>>>>> >>>>>> There are many possible outcomes for tomorrow given where we stand >>>>>> today. Are we forbidden or >>>>>> constrained from using the full suite of tools we have mastered to >>>>>> envision a peaceful, creative, caring, even loving future? >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't know if you've noticed but there is a rising tide of >>>>>> anti-scientism in the US - and it is not anti-science by any means. >>>>>> >>>>>> In part that is because those who call for objective science remain >>>>>> heralded (for better or worse). >>>>>> >>>>>> My overt concern (not yet a fear) is a restructuring based on partial >>>>>> comprehension of science, sociology, psychology, >>>>>> education, economics, and that we may fall short of a society that >>>>>> preserves liberties and freedom that permit >>>>>> evolution or even free expression in these areas. >>>>>> >>>>>> My fear is that the collective academe in the US will wake up too >>>>>> slowly to the reality that at 16.8% of our GDP, 3,600 >>>>>> billion dollars are spent on (largely) for-profit healthcare; that >>>>>> means that 1/6 dollars are being spent on for-profit medicine, and >>>>>> the cost of healthcare is expected to rise dramatically. How will we >>>>>> pay for the rest of what is needed to have a functioning >>>>>> society? >>>>>> >>>>>> Most importantly I think is what process solutions can be envisioned >>>>>> to reform an unsustainable model based on infinite growth? >>>>>> >>>>>> And what other sectors are pathological at this time, and what >>>>>> process solutions might exist to help them improve as well? >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't think we can expect all of the answers here, but surely some >>>>>> answers must exist. >>>>>> >>>>>> JLW >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 12:13 AM Cory David Barker < >>>>>> [log in to unmask]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Read Sonnert and Commons >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.google.com_url-3Fsa-3Dt-26source-3Dweb-26rct-3Dj-26url-3Dhttps-3A__files.eric.ed.gov_fulltext_ED348600.pdf-26ved-3D2ahUKEwiPzMLk-2DtrqAhXELH0KHS5ZAs4QFjABegQIBBAB-26usg-3DAOvVaw1LOvMInu3N1o9iEJvVY8YB&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=MGphR359a7quy3SrHxyaw9QNOlkjTc1XD3iAxr8khiQ&s=KC2RnYSuDNfs2hWuDYSl3JCmlMbH_5t74OoRPnWXrEM&e= >>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.google.com_url-3Fsa-3Dt-26source-3Dweb-26rct-3Dj-26url-3Dhttps-3A__files.eric.ed.gov_fulltext_ED348600.pdf-26ved-3D2ahUKEwiPzMLk-2DtrqAhXELH0KHS5ZAs4QFjABegQIBBAB-26usg-3DAOvVaw1LOvMInu3N1o9iEJvVY8YB&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=dV8LmVFnbOlj5VxkDUn5xSaqWHr5MCLS6uIA6M5o_K4&s=vlgU37ZZpN-_qz8Vk57BXX2HdUErNlYpohaDAUae824&e=> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cory >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 19, 2020, 7:38 PM James Lyons-Weiler < >>>>>>> [log in to unmask]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> With your permission, may I inquire on opinions and discussion of >>>>>>>> root causes of the sociological developments in societies of the current >>>>>>>> suite of what are easily - and not so easily recognized as societal >>>>>>>> dysfunctions. My intended scope is US-centric, but need not be. I'll >>>>>>>> initiate by listing a few issues. Which ones are causal? Which one are >>>>>>>> symptomatic? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Profit interesting bending Science (esp. medicine and psychiatry) >>>>>>>> *Financial perverse incentives distorting Science >>>>>>>> *Lack of meaningful ROI of research translating to effective >>>>>>>> solutions >>>>>>>> *"Left vs. Right focus" masking top-down control (cf. middle-out or >>>>>>>> bottom-up) solutions >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please add to/extend as you like. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We need not agree, of course, but I am keen to see perspectives and >>>>>>>> learn of voices willing to try to *name the issue* and offer a >>>>>>>> definition. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It need not be an "ism", but I suspect it is on the scale of "*Imperialism, >>>>>>>> Nazism, Communism*". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Lately I've been enamored with the phrase "Process Solution"; ie., >>>>>>>> the identification of an ever-improving process that makes the >>>>>>>> identification and adoption of a viable and helpful (valuable) solution >>>>>>>> more likely - so if you have process solutions in mind and if they help >>>>>>>> w/finding a name due to the present absence of that solution, I'd be eager >>>>>>>> to learn of them. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> James Lyons-Weiler, PhD >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 5:56 PM Chance McDermott < >>>>>>>> [log in to unmask]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I support Gregg in this! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> =Chance >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 10:39 AM Cole Butler <[log in to unmask]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Well said, Gregg. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I’ve not been following this Pinker controversy (nor am I >>>>>>>>>> acquainted with his work), but your points regarding contextualization of >>>>>>>>>> the broader socio-political landscape of the US (and West, more broadly) >>>>>>>>>> and the idealogical protection of egos so as to avoid offense both speak to >>>>>>>>>> me. Within the smaller circles of my work, I’ve lately seen the science and >>>>>>>>>> greater mission of our work threatened to be crumbled under the fear of >>>>>>>>>> offending some big personalities. This is quite worrisome from my position, >>>>>>>>>> as others seem to be apt to deferring these feelings toward me. I hope >>>>>>>>>> that, within the academy and more broadly, we can work to be able to speak >>>>>>>>>> freely [even when it threatens offending others (I’m not speaking here in >>>>>>>>>> the context of race)] in the name of the ultimate ideal of helping others >>>>>>>>>> through high-quality work. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cole >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 8:28 AM Michael Mascolo < >>>>>>>>>> [log in to unmask]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Good, courageous work, Gregg. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> M. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> *Michael F. Mascolo, Ph.D.* >>>>>>>>>>> Academic Director, Compass Program >>>>>>>>>>> Professor, Department of Psychology >>>>>>>>>>> Merrimack College, North Andover, MA 01845 >>>>>>>>>>> 978.837.3503 (office) >>>>>>>>>>> 978.979.8745 (cell) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Political Conversations Study: *www.CreatingCommonGround.org >>>>>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.creatingcommonground.org_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=aHGv2k0oV6dpAydV2ONDDuK5xZ5sLdP71WDfMW0XbNI&s=K2PXF679Gi2-qOfSEWxrsP_JOpf0k8E6dg80DGz9IqM&e=>* >>>>>>>>>>> Blog: Values Matter >>>>>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.psychologytoday.com_us_blog_values-2Dmatter&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=aHGv2k0oV6dpAydV2ONDDuK5xZ5sLdP71WDfMW0XbNI&s=yoB292j9_vxRNqpQUYPBaOqDuedD76JIVrr_rGIdgpg&e=> >>>>>>>>>>> Journal: Pedagogy and the Human Sciences >>>>>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__scholarworks.merrimack.edu_phs_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=aHGv2k0oV6dpAydV2ONDDuK5xZ5sLdP71WDfMW0XbNI&s=pMuXe7MRO8Fbz4zNYqxauhFcWuqQ_AaAKsgiRHLpdkw&e=> >>>>>>>>>>> Coaching and Author Website: www.michaelmascolo.com >>>>>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.michaelmascolo.com_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=aHGv2k0oV6dpAydV2ONDDuK5xZ5sLdP71WDfMW0XbNI&s=xAveSTJvhhxN43vKuO2aTElVIXp4b4RzpdaQOzSldjM&e=> >>>>>>>>>>> Academia Home Page: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__merrimack.academia.edu_MichaelMascolo&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=MGphR359a7quy3SrHxyaw9QNOlkjTc1XD3iAxr8khiQ&s=L7OkLAKXMGg0XApAF6O96u6BQcquClAs_XJRkQE3Ids&e= >>>>>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__merrimack.academia.edu_MichaelMascolo&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=aHGv2k0oV6dpAydV2ONDDuK5xZ5sLdP71WDfMW0XbNI&s=LaEf5oyTeHm6B6f1Rf8Xx3f5cHf3mX6F0vvBXpOXARY&e=> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "*Things move, persons act.*" -- Kenneth Burke >>>>>>>>>>> "*If it's not worth doing, it's not worth doing well*." -- >>>>>>>>>>> Donald Hebb >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 19, 2020, at 8:18 AM, Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx < >>>>>>>>>>> [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi TOK Folks, >>>>>>>>>>> I thought I would share this post I made this morning on the >>>>>>>>>>> metamodern forum I am on: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>>>>>> I think when discussing these issues, such as the petition >>>>>>>>>>> against Pinker, the Harper letter, and so forth, it is crucial to >>>>>>>>>>> distinguish the setting/community/cultural context folks have in mind. For >>>>>>>>>>> example, there is the United States as a whole. That might be one >>>>>>>>>>> contextual setting. When folks look at the US as a whole, then you see >>>>>>>>>>> Donald Trump as the President and you see the history of slavery and Jim >>>>>>>>>>> Crow and the remarkable inequities, and much like *@handrews* >>>>>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__forum.metamoderna.org_u_handrews&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=wjF8cZoiFchamTuxBdDEmw&m=_lla770peQlgRBFfwJwSfFiONQdygXo-fy8wGS3q6Ak&s=oF_YzrY5UCQAolXMPE6cNw9JH0qdAlyWGQslIJHNo3Q&e=> >>>>>>>>>>> argues, the general complaints about word usage or political >>>>>>>>>>> positions seem small potatoes. >>>>>>>>>>> However, when we flip the context to inside the academia or >>>>>>>>>>> leftist media centers or other left-leaning ideological contexts, the issue >>>>>>>>>>> is VERY different. I can tell you, I live in the academy, in the social >>>>>>>>>>> sciences (professional psychology) and the climate here is very different. >>>>>>>>>>> We are MUCH closer to thought/language police than people seem to realize. >>>>>>>>>>> Virtue signaling is everywhere, as is an almost Orwellian use of language >>>>>>>>>>> regarding justice and morality (i.e., more often than not in such contexts, >>>>>>>>>>> IMO, those who are doing the moralizing and shaming are not operating from >>>>>>>>>>> a “higher ground”). Not only that, I believe much of it is ideologically >>>>>>>>>>> misguided. Academics bending over backwards to eliminate anything that >>>>>>>>>>> could be subjectively perceived by a person educated in postmodern critical >>>>>>>>>>> race theory as being offensive is not where real change is to be had, IMO. >>>>>>>>>>> Rather, as I saw firsthand in working on the inner city streets of >>>>>>>>>>> Philadelphia from 1999-2003, there are deep class/race/structural issues >>>>>>>>>>> that need to be tackled head on. >>>>>>>>>>> If one is situated in the academy, one should object strongly to >>>>>>>>>>> the letter against Pinker. It justifies language police, which is a problem >>>>>>>>>>> inside hyper-progressive systems and much of the academy has been (is are >>>>>>>>>>> being) captured by this troubling ideology (*see the footnote >>>>>>>>>>> on pg 122 of this article I wrote* >>>>>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.gregghenriques.com_uploads_2_4_3_6_24368778_toward-5Fa-5Fuseful-5Fmass-5Fmovement.pdf&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=wjF8cZoiFchamTuxBdDEmw&m=_lla770peQlgRBFfwJwSfFiONQdygXo-fy8wGS3q6Ak&s=MQ4zFryRZc6-i4sQiqrZFYHGgOzw33TjzpSB-H2qAOQ&e=> >>>>>>>>>>> back in 2005). The bottom line is that we are living in >>>>>>>>>>> massively polarized socio-ideological >>>>>>>>>>> ecologies and because context is everything there are rarely >>>>>>>>>>> general positions (i.e., Pinker letter was “bad” versus “an important >>>>>>>>>>> signal”) that are defensible without specifying the context to apply to >>>>>>>>>>> argument. Inside the context of academy, the Pinker letter is horrendous >>>>>>>>>>> and the signatories should be embarrassed for their actions. In the larger >>>>>>>>>>> context of a society that has elected Trump, it can be seen as a small >>>>>>>>>>> issue that maybe oversteps but makes an important point on principle. >>>>>>>>>>> My hope is that those who operate from a metamodern sensibility >>>>>>>>>>> would have the general capacity to see that the extreme polarization in the >>>>>>>>>>> US (which is probably infecting the West) is a function of inadequate >>>>>>>>>>> cultural codes being defined against one another in problematic ways. We >>>>>>>>>>> need to disentangle those conflicts, eliminate weak positions, and work to >>>>>>>>>>> seek and create common ground based on a clear, rich sophisticated >>>>>>>>>>> sense-making and deep value codes that can stretch across the >>>>>>>>>>> socio-ecological levels of (in)dividual, dyadic, family, small group, >>>>>>>>>>> community, state, nation, transnational and global. >>>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>>> Gregg >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ############################ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: >>>>>>>>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click >>>>>>>>>>> the following link: >>>>>>>>>>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ############################ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: >>>>>>>>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click >>>>>>>>>>> the following link: >>>>>>>>>>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Cole Butler >>>>>>>>>> Research Coordinator >>>>>>>>>> Project Coordinator: Treating Parents with ADHD and their >>>>>>>>>> Children (TPAC >>>>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__umdadhd.org_ongoing-2Dprojects-2Dand-2Dfunding&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=m4Lgr5K9RsK2kfFuDLUucnjl9HBMfu578iixPiNlKAI&s=jEu98H0en2z0M9-YxD4ZZlk1mBP6Op5_2F8VNGhVsMU&e=> >>>>>>>>>> ) >>>>>>>>>> SUCCEEDS >>>>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__umdadhd.org_succeeds&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=m4Lgr5K9RsK2kfFuDLUucnjl9HBMfu578iixPiNlKAI&s=IwKrVbLS1jHCZaquaR76-zEXw7Y8rQjTGKUgDnfI0YE&e=> >>>>>>>>>> Coach >>>>>>>>>> University of Maryland >>>>>>>>>> UMD ADHD Lab >>>>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.umdadhd.org_cole&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=m4Lgr5K9RsK2kfFuDLUucnjl9HBMfu578iixPiNlKAI&s=GOVDjBYmYJAv45tcqfKnD2d3xbBPBf4tbUB8M1XcZ2Y&e=> >>>>>>>>>> 2103W, Cole Field House | College Park, MD 20742 >>>>>>>>>> tel 301.405.6163 >>>>>>>>>> ############################ >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: >>>>>>>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click >>>>>>>>>> the following link: >>>>>>>>>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ############################ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: >>>>>>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click >>>>>>>>> the following link: >>>>>>>>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> james lyons-weiler, phd >>>>>>>> Author, CEO, President, Scientist >>>>>>>> Editor-in-Chief, Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law >>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.publichealthpolicyjournal.com_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=sllb8P2BxAbyIjAbR2j6asv_0446rYYjNCAo-GoLygw&s=UmdT1B8T3JWYV6QmNWxfmkXAzkd6HRGopAuQ-dQL1bc&e=> >>>>>>>> Guest Contributor, Children's Health Defense >>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__childrenshealthdefense.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=sllb8P2BxAbyIjAbR2j6asv_0446rYYjNCAo-GoLygw&s=WfmYRqWO-7n-52na5e7qD3Hm7imFJlOhFwl5fjJw6FA&e=> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The Environmental and Genetic Causes of Autism >>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1KNSxPp&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=sllb8P2BxAbyIjAbR2j6asv_0446rYYjNCAo-GoLygw&s=4tRilo4je86mvXuFSL_WPoWNo6gUc9LWUC1TUM2D9hU&e=> >>>>>>>> (Skyhorse Publishing) >>>>>>>> Cures vs. Profits: Successes in Translational Research >>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.amazon.com_gp_product_9814730149_ref-3Das-5Fli-5Fqf-5Fsp-5Fasin-5Fil-5Ftl-3Fie-3DUTF8-26camp-3D1789-26creative-3D9325-26creativeASIN-3D9814730149-26linkCode-3Das2-26tag-3Dlivgrelivwel-2D20&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=sllb8P2BxAbyIjAbR2j6asv_0446rYYjNCAo-GoLygw&s=I9zcWOtsnINHx8aKDXrOPVJ_8FuSnocuWd5slkXtcko&e=> (World >>>>>>>> Scientific, 2016) >>>>>>>> Ebola: An Evolving Story >>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1TGYY9r&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=sllb8P2BxAbyIjAbR2j6asv_0446rYYjNCAo-GoLygw&s=UvppKf9AhBK5ctxVpUg56l6N-EzmRTYspxbV_NnCtkA&e=> >>>>>>>> (World Scientific, 2015) >>>>>>>> cell 412-728-8743 >>>>>>>> email [log in to unmask] >>>>>>>> www.*linkedin*.com/in/*jameslyonsweiler* >>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_jameslyonsweiler&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=sllb8P2BxAbyIjAbR2j6asv_0446rYYjNCAo-GoLygw&s=Y9BAGnW8J_6EdObtrXQfepIsSRzMB-qmftO3dmW9NUQ&e=> >>>>>>>> ############################ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: >>>>>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the >>>>>>>> following link: >>>>>>>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> ############################ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: >>>>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the >>>>>>> following link: >>>>>>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> --- >>>>>> james lyons-weiler, phd >>>>>> Author, CEO, President, Scientist >>>>>> Editor-in-Chief, Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law >>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.publichealthpolicyjournal.com_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=D-9ZbkJ3UKJEqsE3Xl0MZ4WVjgIoHLzqIgKsT1Zylng&s=vgW6t5Qj9bodrQ1dQ54_Tu0ftOnyF27SXP6-Zir_WAs&e=> >>>>>> Guest Contributor, Children's Health Defense >>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__childrenshealthdefense.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=D-9ZbkJ3UKJEqsE3Xl0MZ4WVjgIoHLzqIgKsT1Zylng&s=IG-W0HWgt-TH7DS8foKhSn7RgjUiMGvVnLMXwo9ICt0&e=> >>>>>> >>>>>> The Environmental and Genetic Causes of Autism >>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1KNSxPp&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=D-9ZbkJ3UKJEqsE3Xl0MZ4WVjgIoHLzqIgKsT1Zylng&s=FPwYmAIjJjQ6jrCets2iWj1thjMF_IZANqxawbclvZA&e=> >>>>>> (Skyhorse Publishing) >>>>>> Cures vs. Profits: Successes in Translational Research >>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.amazon.com_gp_product_9814730149_ref-3Das-5Fli-5Fqf-5Fsp-5Fasin-5Fil-5Ftl-3Fie-3DUTF8-26camp-3D1789-26creative-3D9325-26creativeASIN-3D9814730149-26linkCode-3Das2-26tag-3Dlivgrelivwel-2D20&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=D-9ZbkJ3UKJEqsE3Xl0MZ4WVjgIoHLzqIgKsT1Zylng&s=b-7PQy6ZLJye-X2taQPeYAUqg7juprYpqS_WP4zdKQI&e=> (World >>>>>> Scientific, 2016) >>>>>> Ebola: An Evolving Story >>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1TGYY9r&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=D-9ZbkJ3UKJEqsE3Xl0MZ4WVjgIoHLzqIgKsT1Zylng&s=Qgfw9O83wc85sSjgDLobUjdJ57BxzN4JU9d3HbXuKoY&e=> >>>>>> (World Scientific, 2015) >>>>>> cell 412-728-8743 >>>>>> email [log in to unmask] >>>>>> www.*linkedin*.com/in/*jameslyonsweiler* >>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_jameslyonsweiler&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=D-9ZbkJ3UKJEqsE3Xl0MZ4WVjgIoHLzqIgKsT1Zylng&s=McqD2Ks8Ic764R77bLnuWL3-isaaYTVPIW-nDY43UAw&e=> >>>>>> ############################ >>>>>> >>>>>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: >>>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the >>>>>> following link: >>>>>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 >>>>>> >>>>> ############################ >>>>> >>>>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: >>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the >>>>> following link: >>>>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> --- >>>> james lyons-weiler, phd >>>> Author, CEO, President, Scientist >>>> Editor-in-Chief, Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law >>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.publichealthpolicyjournal.com_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=UxyEqsGIFaHCnM0ZtQjUuKFutQYE5MUomtACQH8hOWw&s=kHVVabqhZepKj6V9WiKZJiS-akS-DhR2S9sz5E2cKb4&e=> >>>> Guest Contributor, Children's Health Defense >>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__childrenshealthdefense.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=UxyEqsGIFaHCnM0ZtQjUuKFutQYE5MUomtACQH8hOWw&s=JGqFMNxW7MRPzg_voCkLyldH_339AvFGg4YNXrheovk&e=> >>>> >>>> The Environmental and Genetic Causes of Autism >>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1KNSxPp&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=UxyEqsGIFaHCnM0ZtQjUuKFutQYE5MUomtACQH8hOWw&s=YASNrlDcI_gVEvsLQoEYBkXdxCXxd7x0aKC-Tem-3CU&e=> >>>> (Skyhorse Publishing) >>>> Cures vs. Profits: Successes in Translational Research >>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.amazon.com_gp_product_9814730149_ref-3Das-5Fli-5Fqf-5Fsp-5Fasin-5Fil-5Ftl-3Fie-3DUTF8-26camp-3D1789-26creative-3D9325-26creativeASIN-3D9814730149-26linkCode-3Das2-26tag-3Dlivgrelivwel-2D20&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=UxyEqsGIFaHCnM0ZtQjUuKFutQYE5MUomtACQH8hOWw&s=e7DmrbWEAcOz6irZMZ_k-N3iXZE9vuVYl2W0JOlkL8o&e=> (World >>>> Scientific, 2016) >>>> Ebola: An Evolving Story >>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1TGYY9r&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=UxyEqsGIFaHCnM0ZtQjUuKFutQYE5MUomtACQH8hOWw&s=BiWqdMsZFofVA8WwGDYg3gsyK3F8NI_dGpVr-Jh1uck&e=> >>>> (World Scientific, 2015) >>>> cell 412-728-8743 >>>> email [log in to unmask] >>>> www.*linkedin*.com/in/*jameslyonsweiler* >>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_jameslyonsweiler&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=UxyEqsGIFaHCnM0ZtQjUuKFutQYE5MUomtACQH8hOWw&s=bWF-u8eClHoz3hzaJH2QsViZNNERqOlVpTbwOqPfZfw&e=> >>>> ############################ >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: >>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the >>>> following link: >>>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 >>>> >>> ############################ >>> >>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: >>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the >>> following link: >>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 >>> >> ############################ >> >> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: >> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the >> following link: >> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 >> > ############################ > > To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: > mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the > following link: > http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 > -- --- james lyons-weiler, phd Author, CEO, President, Scientist Editor-in-Chief, Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.publichealthpolicyjournal.com_&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=MGphR359a7quy3SrHxyaw9QNOlkjTc1XD3iAxr8khiQ&s=C_KxVcDY8-DLNsAiyg07UWJgSbMD0fRdCDFELRxW3TI&e= > Guest Contributor, Children's Health Defense <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__childrenshealthdefense.org&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=MGphR359a7quy3SrHxyaw9QNOlkjTc1XD3iAxr8khiQ&s=wJhnfEMXKCbKUNgtFJSe_GIYeeHo30TOJE3jn4shUHo&e= > The Environmental and Genetic Causes of Autism <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1KNSxPp&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=MGphR359a7quy3SrHxyaw9QNOlkjTc1XD3iAxr8khiQ&s=cC0YYI4KYiAy6si_kf0JIDGoz_bBV0UHYYremrqpVks&e= > (Skyhorse Publishing) Cures vs. Profits: Successes in Translational Research <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.amazon.com_gp_product_9814730149_ref-3Das-5Fli-5Fqf-5Fsp-5Fasin-5Fil-5Ftl-3Fie-3DUTF8-26camp-3D1789-26creative-3D9325-26creativeASIN-3D9814730149-26linkCode-3Das2-26tag-3Dlivgrelivwel-2D20&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=MGphR359a7quy3SrHxyaw9QNOlkjTc1XD3iAxr8khiQ&s=11096BD9w8A7rPxUDHHeQAJ0BbiDJmIImyKZIoiuI9A&e= > (World Scientific, 2016) Ebola: An Evolving Story <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1TGYY9r&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=MGphR359a7quy3SrHxyaw9QNOlkjTc1XD3iAxr8khiQ&s=Zv1dwo31qdm9mx9qcG8Ce5r-uvkP0NTyqcgbfOuUHjg&e= > (World Scientific, 2015) cell 412-728-8743 email [log in to unmask] www.*linkedin*.com/in/*jameslyonsweiler* <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_jameslyonsweiler&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=MGphR359a7quy3SrHxyaw9QNOlkjTc1XD3iAxr8khiQ&s=jI-v6XNdJjj2DiZLZdjCRL60I-WZq-sxQ0s_VH1t91g&e= > ############################ To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1