############################Thanks for a great presentation.
I want to better communicate an idea I struggled to express during the Monday night forum.
The idea is that “we have no consistent prototype for the word ‘justice’”.
How do we learn the meaning of words? In the example of the word “tree” we learn this that and the other are trees, and bushes, shrubs, flowers, grass and cell towers are not trees. From these specific examples our language brains construct a protype to link to the word (symbol) “tree”.
Contrast this with learning the word “justice” How can we point to examples of justice? A few examples form the past few months include neck kneeling, commuting the sentences of Rodger Stone, and kidnapping demonstrators. A broader sample ranges from “an eye for an eye” to broad reparations. Theories of justice include retribution, restoration, remuneration, rehabilitation, and more. I contend the we don’t share any single concept that converges to the word “justice”. Equating justice with fairness is problematic because fairness itself is at least three concepts. We also need to ask “justice for whom”, “justice when” and “justice why”..
While Waldemar described the difficulty learners (think young children) have in grasping abstract concepts, I contend that the lack of a broadly accepted prototype for various abstract words (such as “Justice”) is a large part of the problem. The word “Justice” is a composite of different concepts and these differing concepts need to be extracted separately and named separately to allow us to form a language prototype for each.
One approach might be to differentiate diverse classes of actions that we now call “justice” and to take care to use that more specifically descriptive word in our communications. For example, we can take care to use terms such as “retributive justice” or “restorative justice”.
Thanks,
Lee Beaumont
From: tree of knowledge system discussion <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Waldemar Schmidt
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2020 12:24 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: We Thrive TOK Meeting on Communication
I have no objection.
I enjoyed the opportunity to contribute.
Waldemar A Schmidt, PhD, MD
(Perseveret et Percipiunt)
503.631.8044
Strive not to be a success, but rather to be of value. (A Einstein)
On Jul 21, 2020, at 6:25 AM, Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Hi All,
Thanks so much to Waldemar for his excellent presentation on Communication, Language, and Abstraction and the kind of thinking we need for the 21st Century. I will be posting the video of it tomorrow unless any of the participants object.
Warm regards,
Gregg
From: tree of knowledge system discussion <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Waldemar Schmidt
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2020 7:01 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: We Thrive TOK Meeting on Communication
Dear Friends:
Thank you each and all for listening and participating.
I have a couple of articles you might find interesting.
Best regards,
Waldemar
############################
To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
############################
To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
############################
To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
Waldemar A Schmidt, PhD, MD
(Perseveret et Percipiunt)
503.631.8044
Strive not to be a success, but rather to be of value. (A Einstein)
On Jul 20, 2020, at 2:16 PM, Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Hi Folks,
We are meeting in 15 minutes to hear Waldemar walk us through his thoughts on communication. Here is the link:
Meeting ID: 883 3869 8330
Passcode: 801059
One tap mobile
+13126266799,,88338698330#,,,,,,0#,,801059# US (Chicago)
+16465588656,,88338698330#,,,,,,0#,,801059# US (New York)
Dial by your location
+1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)
+1 646 558 8656 US (New York)
+1 301 715 8592 US (Germantown)
+1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)
+1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose)
+1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)
Meeting ID: 883 3869 8330
Passcode: 801059
Find your local number: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kdpUR81r2D############################
To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
############################
To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
############################
To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
############################
To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1