Thank you. I'm writing a treatise on this inspired by our discussions that is a little mind-blowing. On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 2:48 PM Bradley H. Werrell, D.O. < [log in to unmask]> wrote: > Wonderful post by Jack. > > I particularly liked this element; > > We are shaved apes with self-referential G x E cognitive plasticities with > emergences such as self awareness, culture, traditions, external memory > devices (books etc) which also provide further E influences, and we are > currently using the cognitive plasticities to try to understand them. > > > I would hasten to edit only a little bit this quote, such that what Jack > is calling "emergences" to be "emergencies," for it appears that such > development is always associated with some crisis of being as manifest in > our human condition. > > We are in one now. > > > Bradley > > > > > Bradley H. Werrell, D.O. - This email is private and copyrighted by the > author. > > On Friday, September 25, 2020, 08:40:57 AM MST, James Lyons-Weiler < > [log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > Greg, > > I agree w/you. > > My interjection of course is not meant to replace or explain everything, > evolutionary causes are not sufficient at all, but they are a necessary > (but insufficient) starting place. > > I know you agree that ToK would be incomplete without evolutionary > starting points. > > Our ancestral legacies, such as hormones, absolutely *influence* us and > what can be studied at the higher levels. > > Most evolutionary biologists would not, I think, presume to think > seriously that we are merely shaved apes. > > We're so much more than that. > > We are shaved apes with self-referential G x E cognitive plasticities with > emergences such as self awareness, culture, traditions, external memory > devices (books etc) which also provide further E influences, and we are > currently using the cognitive plasticities to try to understand them. > > Our collective minds then become a landscape upon which a collective > intelligence about the world (including ourselves); it is an evolving > collective intelligence, fluid, subject to mutation and selection. BIT > and JUST are very useful and more general places within which this truth > resides and bridge to societal tendencies and emergences. > > Another way to say this is that we really need to consider Cognitive > Plastic Phenotype (CPP) = G x E^2 > > At the same time, to me, ToK by definition is a beautiful and > comprehensive *example* of those activities (unless you've had external > influences you're not telling us about) :) Philosophers of logic can have > fun trying to reconcile how specific examples such as ToK can or cannot be > explained by themselves; your invocation of non-theistic metaphysics gives > hypothetical framework which also represents an example of the competing > ideas residing in the collective intelligence, but to me it's not an > escape. I don't see ToK as tautological though- because as any model > approaches sufficiency and completeness, it often becomes indistinguishable > from reality. > > Convergence of quantum mechanics reconciled with general relativity will > also seem obvious (unless GR needs to be replaced with an update). > > Thus, well done! > > I imagine that a self-help book "Embrace The Shaved Ape Within You" would > be fun. > > Jack > > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:09 AM Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx < > [log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Thanks for this reply. This opens up a whole host of issues that I have > long wrestled with, so I will not dive into the details. > > > > The short reply I will offer is that (a) evolutionary does provide an > absolutely necessary lens to understand human behavior and (b) it is not > straightforward to go from an evolutionary biological analysis to > understanding human mental behavior. > > > > The reason why can be framed by the ToK System. You can’t just go from the > second joint point (even a sophisticated evo devo synthesis) to human > behavior without going through BIT first, then JUST. Even then you aren’t > done, because you have grapple with fact-value issues. Steve Quackenbush > will be talking about how the problem of value haunts psychology in a > future TOK Community meeting. > > > > So, short answer is, yes, I agree it is crucial to have the lens, and it > is also the case that it needs to be qualified by considerations that I > generally find evolutionary biologists to be blind to. For example, Bret > Weinstein, god love him, way over shoots in his analysis of the extend to > which you can apply straight forward evolutionary biological thinking to > things like religion. Once you get the JUST frame right, then you can see > why analyses like his are, well, profoundly incomplete. > > For a few essays on evolutionary psychology, see here: > > First, on why, from a UTOK perspective, evo psych comes up short: > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.psychologytoday.com_us_blog_theory-2Dknowledge_201310_ep-2Dis-2Dnot-2Dviable-2Dintegrative-2Dmeta-2Dtheory&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=eSz18KulCYitVgOyiZr64lLGIlkXEBykoveJT4zPlJ0&s=zISVxfZfm_nc3Oux8CwjikRA_CU5v5N1yr35aZGK-4M&e= > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.psychologytoday.com_us_blog_theory-2Dknowledge_201310_ep-2Dis-2Dnot-2Dviable-2Dintegrative-2Dmeta-2Dtheory&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=EAKsDwUYpPwFHnnc_fuGs08K9YDw9VM53f6-h7dwxb0&s=IsYUJOHIQE0sKFSNLW47nVdX6qgWbAj7Jsn9N5zK9yg&e=> > > > > a critique of my critique: > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.psychologytoday.com_us_blog_pop-2Dpsych_201310_evolutionary-2Dpsychology-2Dtying-2Dpsychology-2Dtogether&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=eSz18KulCYitVgOyiZr64lLGIlkXEBykoveJT4zPlJ0&s=fWJm3Vugqt6vnw0uloSXc5Y_WqC3JbJsGWmJ8NgnhkE&e= > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.psychologytoday.com_us_blog_pop-2Dpsych_201310_evolutionary-2Dpsychology-2Dtying-2Dpsychology-2Dtogether&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=EAKsDwUYpPwFHnnc_fuGs08K9YDw9VM53f6-h7dwxb0&s=2hvuEvwlQklq0796MXr7iDHdzzOnG93vF14kCyWkCBk&e=> > > > > and my critique of that: > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.psychologytoday.com_us_blog_theory-2Dknowledge_201310_rhetoric-2Ddebate-2Dand-2Ddialogue-2Dabout-2Dep&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=eSz18KulCYitVgOyiZr64lLGIlkXEBykoveJT4zPlJ0&s=Izo664KZriYjFB8Wx5hWQzcPcRhxah_NwhK6Dpy0Anc&e= > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.psychologytoday.com_us_blog_theory-2Dknowledge_201310_rhetoric-2Ddebate-2Dand-2Ddialogue-2Dabout-2Dep&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=EAKsDwUYpPwFHnnc_fuGs08K9YDw9VM53f6-h7dwxb0&s=joTLV5q7Oaxr22sNQRsP_kiSy9sJgKxpPCdKROK_3UU&e=> > > > > Best, > Gregg > > > > *From:* tree of knowledge system discussion < > [log in to unmask]>*On Behalf Of *James Lyons-Weiler > *Sent:* Friday, September 25, 2020 8:32 AM > *To:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* Re: Reevaluating Beliefs > > > > Quick evolutionary interjection Gregg- > > > > To me, it is utterly ironic that the brain that creates and conducts > reason, science and logic seek hopelessly to apply the same > > set of mental frameworks to understand its own irrationality. Achieving > that goal is, at best, only sometimes possible. > > > > One way to make sense is to surmise that perhaps in many irrationalities > there underlies a rationality that transcends our minds. > > An evolutionary explanation of love, for example, by most seen as > irrational, is pair-bonding that leads to survival of offspring. Birds > dancing in unison serves the same purpose and has no other rational > explanation. > > > > So in couples' counseling, sometimes aggression/control can be seen as > having, ultimately, a rational impetus as part of a > > genetic repertoire of behavioral options for spousal manipulation/control > to reinforce the contract of the pair bond. It is of course also > > rational to understand that alternative means may be more effective. > > > > I'm not sufficiently schooled in the history of evolutionary psychology to > stand firm here on this, and the testability criticism weakness > (appropriately) in my view the "instant validation" of the evolutionary > explanation, however, a systematic analysis of dysfunctional behavior that > > begins with the analysis of the couple as part of the larger sociological > set to which they belong, and to the species to which they belong, > > tells us that as a bonded, married couple, they are best understood as > being a couple that belongs to a species whose members not merely sometimes > partake in serial monogamy, promiscuity, parental investment; that the two > genders are expected to have different investment strategies, with > distinctly different evolutionary stable strategies being expected in the > gender, indeed the same person at different times in life, > > depending on many cues. > > > > It is not to belittle the human mind or the species to acknowledge the > evolutionary legacy that gives us these complex organs a starting point. > > > > There is, then the reality that we recently have come through an amazing > but shallow history shifting us from hunter/gatherer tribes in small > > populations to increasingly larger populations with a decreasing role of > small group dynamics; potential mates are no longer rarer, and in our > cognitive hyperplasticity phenotype we see that we are adaptable to new > norms and laws so we can learn that wife-beating, for example, is wrong; > society may provide alternative cues that tell men (or abusive women) that > it's not unusual, and police responses can misguide men (or women) into a > pattern by misaligning the cues to which they respond, triggering further > abuse or dysfunction. These environmental inputs matter more than defining > situational context; they provide the E in the G x E interaction of human > cognitive phenotypic hyperplasticity without resorting to reductionism. > > > > The phenotype of cognitive flexibility has a rational ultimate basis in > evolution; those who fail to adapt to societal norms being taken out of the > gene pool via imprisonment, death, shunning... we can begin to grasp a > comprehension of the otherwise incomprehensible without for a moment saying > that we are subject to any particular fate by our genes. > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 7:51 AM Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx < > [log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Hi Lee, > > > > My analysis of the BEVI is complicated. Moreover, I no longer work much > with Craig Shealy, and I know it as evolved some, but I can’t really > comment much on where it is or respond to these questions with any > authority. > > > > But I do have some thoughts about these issues. From where I sit (i.e., > my scientific, humanistic metapsychology theory of knowledge) I sometimes > find that you attempt to apply a model of scientific realism to all domains > of human belief, but that feels to me inadequate. Indeed, much of human > activity, engagement, fighting about what is real, take place in domains > that are not amenable to being analyzed via a scientific realist > onto-epistemology. The reason is because the onto-epistemological > belief-value subjective networks are all tied up with the issue at hand. > > > > Here is blog that gets at what I mean that enters the world of couple’s > therapy > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.psychologytoday.com_us_blog_theory-2Dknowledge_201504_your-2Dversion-2Dreality-2Dand-2Dmine&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=lhaBGK2LX7aK2UmOFg-A_U3Oe-9d-sgiYPcjVv8P1nI&s=MBmX823KaeKpPx6fL78IBov0_rUZFhVCpLyk6dcYYtM&e=>. > Note, it incorporates Shealy’s Version of Reality concept that was > discussed in that paper. > > > > I agree that a scientific realist onto-epistemology can provide a frame > for the couple. But I don’t think it is adequate for much of the work. Take > the husband’s claim: “You are a liar”. Is that a fact that corresponds to > reality? I don’t think there is a simple answer here (e.g., a case could > easily be made that the wife exaggerated and misrepresented and sometimes > “lied”, but does that justify the trait-based claim? What is the reality > here? It is not like the shape of the Earth). This is why I think you need > more of a humanistic, values-based, relational developmental social > construction of reality frame to deal with issues like this. The reality of > the relationship is constructed by their actions and justifications. Thus, > the observer of an independent reality that is the supposition of a > scientific realism does not work very well in everyday, idiographic, > interpersonal engagements. I am guessing that this is why the > professional/practicing psychologists found your very interesting take to > be insufficient to deal with the subjective and value-based intersubjective > domains that are so apparent in the therapy room. > > > > Love to get your take on this. > > > Best, > Gregg > > > > *From:* tree of knowledge system discussion < > [log in to unmask]>*On Behalf Of *Leland Beaumont > *Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2020 11:50 AM > *To:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* Re: Reevaluating Beliefs > > > > Thanks Rob, > > I enjoyed watching your google talks video (twice!) I am looking forward > to your forum presentation. > > > > At 39:50 in the video you use the phrase “useful truth” and then go on to > say that “truth is weird”. > > > > In my “seeking real good” talk I stated that “truth corresponds to > reality”. I also mentioned that reality is vast, complex, and dynamic. > > > > When we get a chance, I would like to discuss the distinctions between > “useful truth” and “correspondence to reality” especially in considering > the question of “Where was Barack Obama born?” > > > > Gregg, thanks for the EI, BEVI paper; it is very helpful. > > > > I notice the paper lacks explicit reference to reality as a primary and > unifying frame of reference for acquiring, assessing, and accepting or > rejecting beliefs. On page 95 it is claimed the counselor has an “…ethical > obligation to adopt client's values and beliefs.” I argue there is an > obligation (perhaps even more compelling) to assess and influence those > beliefs toward true beliefs, consistent with our best understanding of > reality. Also the 10 process scales from the BEVI lack an item for > "cognitive contact with reality" – reflecting the relevance of empirical > evidence in forming beliefs. (e.g. I believe the earth is nearly spherical > because in fact (based on the correspondence to reality, learning that > expert exploration of the earth provides representative evidence that the > earth is nearly spherical) the earth*is *nearly spherical.) (P99) It also > does not (explicitly) address "personal epistemology" –what is the process > you use to choose your beliefs. > > > > Eric, thanks for identifying the importance of Post-Traumatic growth. > > > > Lee Beaumont > > *From:* tree of knowledge system discussion < > [log in to unmask]>*On Behalf Of *easalien > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 22, 2020 6:16 PM > *To:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* Reevaluating Beliefs > > > > Hey Leland, Having been on both sides of the equation, I can say change is > often a response to trauma, real or perceived. It’s a form of adaptive > behavior driven by adverse circumstances. Very rarely do comfortable people > change. > > > > Most of you I’m sure have heard of PTSD. The other side of that is > Post-Traumatic Growth. This article sums it up nicely: > > > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__blogs.scientificamerican.com_beautiful-2Dminds_post-2Dtraumatic-2Dgrowth-2Dfinding-2Dmeaning-2Dand-2Dcreativity-2Din-2Dadversity_&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=eSz18KulCYitVgOyiZr64lLGIlkXEBykoveJT4zPlJ0&s=2GMyYKVx0UFBFvcEOrOucWfNZRuox_aeVLyOeQX8mM8&e= > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__blogs.scientificamerican.com_beautiful-2Dminds_post-2Dtraumatic-2Dgrowth-2Dfinding-2Dmeaning-2Dand-2Dcreativity-2Din-2Dadversity_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=FE9YjbAkxcapLo-BOfWURIZDgaGBWZfogomrcPeIbAA&s=4tUV_boJFf2CL2mhoj_hZSXigbj4OUass2CL2U93atY&e=> > > > > With the clusterf*ck that is 2020, cherished beliefs are challenged and > people are retreating into entrenched ideologies or opening up to the > truth, which must be experienced a posteriori. Otherwise, it’s like a > scholar “explaining” war to a veteran. It rings hollow. > > > > Personally, abandoning unverified belief in exchange for verifiable truth > has brought a remarkable sense of balance. It’s taught me empathy and > gratitude as well as peace with uncertainty. With the world as it is, maybe > we need to take our philosophy and let it go. > > > > Eric S. > > > On Thursday, September 17, 2020, Leland Beaumont <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > > ToK Forum Members, > > Intrigued by questions that were raised when I presented Seeking Real Good > to this forum, I am researching the topic of “Reexamining Beliefs”. I have > recently read several books that pertain to forming beliefs and defending > long-held beliefs. What I am still curious to understand is the triggers > and introspective processes that result in people changing deeply held > beliefs. For example, why do some people reflect on their religious beliefs > and become non-theists? Why do people switch political parties, what > triggers the shift from “love you forever” to “divorce you now”, why did > some people shift from never Trump to Trump forever while Michael Cohen > turned against him? Why do some people leave cults and others double down? > What attracts people toward conspiracy theories and then what changes that > causes people to abandon those theories? > > > > I would like to be able to describe a process each of us would be > motivated to use to reexamine our beliefs and progress toward true beliefs. > > > > I will appreciate it if you can recommend reliable references on this > topic. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Lee Beaumont > > > > > > > > ############################ > > > > To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: > > write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] > > or click the following link: > > http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 > > > > > > ############################ > > To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: > mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the > following link:http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 > > ############################ > > To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: > mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the > following link:http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 > > ############################ > > To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: > mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the > following link:http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 > > > > > -- > > --- > james lyons-weiler, phd > > Author, CEO, President, Scientist > > Editor-in-Chief, Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.publichealthpolicyjournal.com_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=lhaBGK2LX7aK2UmOFg-A_U3Oe-9d-sgiYPcjVv8P1nI&s=nHhodjDhtmtNGRGTfUja_JESJn1cJTR7toW8xLp3NKc&e=> > > Guest Contributor, Children's Health Defense > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__childrenshealthdefense.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=lhaBGK2LX7aK2UmOFg-A_U3Oe-9d-sgiYPcjVv8P1nI&s=PRu-a5wDr2iXic9zuqOzzlz6wBxnMcLkumaz4Z7L5VA&e=> > > > > The Environmental and Genetic Causes of Autism > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1KNSxPp&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=lhaBGK2LX7aK2UmOFg-A_U3Oe-9d-sgiYPcjVv8P1nI&s=fkWiuSIci7kBRcvjpA88YIhqcsd_BssV-AvpxG6Dy9k&e=> > (Skyhorse Publishing) > > Cures vs. Profits: Successes in Translational Research > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.amazon.com_gp_product_9814730149_ref-3Das-5Fli-5Fqf-5Fsp-5Fasin-5Fil-5Ftl-3Fie-3DUTF8-26camp-3D1789-26creative-3D9325-26creativeASIN-3D9814730149-26linkCode-3Das2-26tag-3Dlivgrelivwel-2D20&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=lhaBGK2LX7aK2UmOFg-A_U3Oe-9d-sgiYPcjVv8P1nI&s=FlDBIYP4ysnE6C5B6fFXR32RoMdH6KrmeaDLWYj4Uok&e=> (World > Scientific, 2016) > > Ebola: An Evolving Story > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1TGYY9r&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=lhaBGK2LX7aK2UmOFg-A_U3Oe-9d-sgiYPcjVv8P1nI&s=77J4lhTu7CsgDk_qKxCklrFy3o0cut8DKig1YKw98rc&e=> > (World Scientific, 2015) > > cell 412-728-8743 > email [log in to unmask] > www.*linkedin*.com/in/*jameslyonsweiler* > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_jameslyonsweiler&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=lhaBGK2LX7aK2UmOFg-A_U3Oe-9d-sgiYPcjVv8P1nI&s=lGV2aRt7fPwRrNCG-kc63o9zY14tk_pz9m6Crl8ymbg&e=> > > ############################ > > To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: > mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the > following link:http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 > ############################ > > To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:write to: > mailto:[log in to unmask] click the > following link:http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 > > > > -- > --- > james lyons-weiler, phd > Author, CEO, President, Scientist > Editor-in-Chief, Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.publichealthpolicyjournal.com_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=EAKsDwUYpPwFHnnc_fuGs08K9YDw9VM53f6-h7dwxb0&s=83_oSYU27XqLnf9yqzfAsLaNcZ_zuP-LA70_P2r3QRg&e=> > Guest Contributor, Children's Health Defense > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__childrenshealthdefense.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=EAKsDwUYpPwFHnnc_fuGs08K9YDw9VM53f6-h7dwxb0&s=91JY9bY6FN6tPlwoeQfvVBxi_aLKQt6XhWYXSVjIJQU&e=> > > The Environmental and Genetic Causes of Autism > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1KNSxPp&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=EAKsDwUYpPwFHnnc_fuGs08K9YDw9VM53f6-h7dwxb0&s=nPS92YqV9GsOCZms6pONmGvkpbnUM4zX7opAXbtN-hk&e=> > (Skyhorse Publishing) > Cures vs. Profits: Successes in Translational Research > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.amazon.com_gp_product_9814730149_ref-3Das-5Fli-5Fqf-5Fsp-5Fasin-5Fil-5Ftl-3Fie-3DUTF8-26camp-3D1789-26creative-3D9325-26creativeASIN-3D9814730149-26linkCode-3Das2-26tag-3Dlivgrelivwel-2D20&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=EAKsDwUYpPwFHnnc_fuGs08K9YDw9VM53f6-h7dwxb0&s=0tbW9v-IK64MGijZ5dxmvHqQco5krJAkB3pr41V6yoU&e=> (World > Scientific, 2016) > Ebola: An Evolving Story > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1TGYY9r&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=EAKsDwUYpPwFHnnc_fuGs08K9YDw9VM53f6-h7dwxb0&s=coQ7Sb_eM2n6951CHuF71k1mGAR06yZWtsSed5_5eHg&e=> > (World Scientific, 2015) > cell 412-728-8743 > email [log in to unmask] > www.*linkedin*.com/in/*jameslyonsweiler* > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_jameslyonsweiler&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=EAKsDwUYpPwFHnnc_fuGs08K9YDw9VM53f6-h7dwxb0&s=JZWAEHzD-x1QObt6KO3zSaCMN4V0Cfb1cjX6hdd-PoM&e=> > ############################ > > To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:write to: > mailto:[log in to unmask] click the > following link:http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 > ############################ > > To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: > mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the > following link: > http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 > -- --- james lyons-weiler, phd Author, CEO, President, Scientist Editor-in-Chief, Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.publichealthpolicyjournal.com_&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=eSz18KulCYitVgOyiZr64lLGIlkXEBykoveJT4zPlJ0&s=LMab95YMd02BTADLoD95raoq8669l1Wuv4xeWRAhv4s&e= > Guest Contributor, Children's Health Defense <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__childrenshealthdefense.org&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=eSz18KulCYitVgOyiZr64lLGIlkXEBykoveJT4zPlJ0&s=7JNgFGyG3jJ6CfkcMBI5szghQ5Fzg9xvXj4QCoXBNz4&e= > The Environmental and Genetic Causes of Autism <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1KNSxPp&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=eSz18KulCYitVgOyiZr64lLGIlkXEBykoveJT4zPlJ0&s=bry_QVBv49D1OoWNFMfUHCKYqeEcuwBma9e5GGl9CiE&e= > (Skyhorse Publishing) Cures vs. Profits: Successes in Translational Research <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.amazon.com_gp_product_9814730149_ref-3Das-5Fli-5Fqf-5Fsp-5Fasin-5Fil-5Ftl-3Fie-3DUTF8-26camp-3D1789-26creative-3D9325-26creativeASIN-3D9814730149-26linkCode-3Das2-26tag-3Dlivgrelivwel-2D20&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=eSz18KulCYitVgOyiZr64lLGIlkXEBykoveJT4zPlJ0&s=aeST6O7rAMxM8mT3o5Po7eT2sFof6fgxzZ-LGi8VqO0&e= > (World Scientific, 2016) Ebola: An Evolving Story <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1TGYY9r&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=eSz18KulCYitVgOyiZr64lLGIlkXEBykoveJT4zPlJ0&s=OK_3NYJPpX4m6Haw8eu6cRk8OJFYd_xDGy4lXwqicWw&e= > (World Scientific, 2015) cell 412-728-8743 email [log in to unmask] www.*linkedin*.com/in/*jameslyonsweiler* <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_jameslyonsweiler&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=eSz18KulCYitVgOyiZr64lLGIlkXEBykoveJT4zPlJ0&s=6EbYjMdORVRwAGaHIXHuBoWn1Ei5QO5wqsUU7WG5GJ4&e= > ############################ To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1