This points to what Professor of History Carrol Quigley termed the inevitable "Institutionalization of Social Instruments," in which the original intention of the social instrument is subverted, at least to a certain extent, with its inevitable institutionalization.  

This is because competing interests begin to gain the upper hand in the management of the institution.

He wrote about it in his Evolution of Civilizations, 1960.



Bradley H. Werrell, D.O. - This email is private and copyrighted by the author.


On Saturday, November 14, 2020, 09:46:36 AM MST, Jamie D <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


CAUTION: This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
This might be a bit left-field, but I'm curious to hear all your thoughts:

1. Academia was created to institutionalize truth seeking.

2. If academics are all motivated for money, status, tenure, prestige, their families, and not a direct passion for truth....how can Academia fullfill it's purpose? Don't the incentives put a cap on how far the academy can progress into the horizon of mystery?

In my experience, talking with academics who haven't learned humility is often  stressful.... Anything they don't understand immediately must be pounced on like an opportunity to best the other, which suggest a fear of being bested underneath. And that fear of being wrong is the first thing to be removed if you seek truth! 

Jamie





 
 

--
-Jamie 
############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1

############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1