Jamie,
If we can become skilled at metacognition, then it seems your quoted claim becomes false.
(I apologize if I am responding to this one post out of context; I have not studied the full thread.)
Thanks,
Lee Beaumont
From: tree of knowledge system discussion <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Jamie D
Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2020 7:19 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Clarification on the costs of scientific mindset
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Gregg,
Your reply was vague, suggesting I may have communicated.
Is the following common knowledge or redundant in some way?
"When the obstacle is not an external object to be controlled or manipulated, but one's very internal state, the scientific mind can't win, because the person will continually declare the problem each time they try to change it."
(This should have to do with intersecting between mind's 3a and 3b, and how mind 1b expresses Mind 3a's identification with loss non-volitionally, subverting any efforts to connect or cultivate a joyful, attractive persona.)
Jamie
############################
To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1