Hi Greg, On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 3:46 PM Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > My general reply is no. I do see qualia as a key ingredient, but an > isolated disembodied qualia? > Not disembodied. Composed of whatever qualia are, like our consciousness, just a small amount of it. How would you define the minimum necessary to be considered conscious? Also, my journey with John oriented me more toward adverbial qualia (the > hereness-nowness-togetherness) than adjectival qualia (properties like > redness). > > Interesting. Can you help me understand what you mean by "adverbial qualia"? To be more specific, if consciousness was remaining static, except for one pixel on the surface of the brain changing between redness and greenness, what would the objectively observable change in the brain be like which was that awareness of only that one-pixel change? Adverbs are about verbs, and verbs are about things performing actions, more of a computation about the things doing such, and such and such an adverbial manner. What is it, that is representing the thing that is doing the verb action in that manner? To me, the knowledge of the thing doing something, is the qualia, the action computation meaning, and how all that is being done, is the computation done by the binding of all that. When redness is specified in Wikipedia, as THE example of a qualia most used, how is that redness adverbial? ############################ To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1