There is the possibility that the more birth control pills women consume, the more estrogen will end up in nature and--hypothetically--more boys will be born with hypospadias. The condition is becoming more frequent. Best, Lene On 20-05-2021 14:18, Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx wrote: > > Thanks for this, Corinne. > > This discussion reminds me of a series of lectures that I co-presented > with a cultural anthropologist on the nature of sex and gender. He > took the position of significant sexual and gender fluidity. I granted > that but argued that one could clearly “overshoot” and that distinct > biological sex (i.e., male and female) is a foundation of primate > biology (note, as this article on fish clearly shows, sex in nature is > far more complicated). The class concluded with the idea that there is > a clear bimodal distribution in male and female primate body plan, but > there are clearly many dimensions and it was not a sharp dichotomy. > Moreover, the social construction of sex and gender in different > societies has shown huge diversity. And even here there is significant > trends and patterns that have some “truths” that transcend the “mere” > social construction. What emerged were questions of how to understand > sex and construct gendered roles and identities that fostered > flexibility, honored our nature(s), and cultivated well-being. > > > Best, > > Gregg > > *From:* tree of knowledge system discussion > <[log in to unmask]> *On Behalf Of *Diop, Corinne - diopcj > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 18, 2021 5:44 PM > *To:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* Re: TOK Psychology Prof Removed From APA Discussion After > Saying There Are Only 2 Genders (*Newsweek*) > > Hi all, > > While I support the professor’s right to say what he wants, it seems > standard to acknowledge that intersex is a real thing. In fact, > depending on what data is used it is statistically as prevalent as > being a twin. > > There is an uptick in college-age students who identify as non-binary > for a variety of reasons including-- there is now the realization that > reactionary surgery to “fix” a baby isn’t a good idea; it is more > socially acceptable to embrace and identify as intersex; there are > statistically more intersex babies being born. > > Sex Redefined: The Idea of 2 Sexes Is Overly Simplistic - 2018 > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.scientificamerican.com_article_sex-2Dredefined-2Dthe-2Didea-2Dof-2D2-2Dsexes-2Dis-2Doverly-2Dsimplistic1_&d=DwID-g&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=fMPlylSKxgSuo8NFGP6FKyylXNjO4KyTHt9sMDT9hGM&s=7BgeWhk4DKGftoTAXl1Jqa0toP4Zt02KDJ0of7i_VGw&e= > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.scientificamerican.com_article_sex-2Dredefined-2Dthe-2Didea-2Dof-2D2-2Dsexes-2Dis-2Doverly-2Dsimplistic1_&d=DwID-g&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=fMPlylSKxgSuo8NFGP6FKyylXNjO4KyTHt9sMDT9hGM&s=7BgeWhk4DKGftoTAXl1Jqa0toP4Zt02KDJ0of7i_VGw&e= > > > > HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH – 2017 > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.hrw.org_report_2017_07_25_i-2Dwant-2Dbe-2Dnature-2Dmade-2Dme_medically-2Dunnecessary-2Dsurgeries-2Dintersex-2Dchildren-2Dus-23&d=DwID-g&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=fMPlylSKxgSuo8NFGP6FKyylXNjO4KyTHt9sMDT9hGM&s=o566H87uaRYckhoRoXUE3T6JfED-8Y3NFXRSJPXYCLc&e= > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.hrw.org_report_2017_07_25_i-2Dwant-2Dbe-2Dnature-2Dmade-2Dme_medically-2Dunnecessary-2Dsurgeries-2Dintersex-2Dchildren-2Dus&d=DwID-g&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=fMPlylSKxgSuo8NFGP6FKyylXNjO4KyTHt9sMDT9hGM&s=7G1Ju1CDGIZF21NU1MDRMgyE5QGvuPt4fy-oLJNe6Wc&e= > > > > The Increasing Prevalence in Intersex Variation from Toxicological > Dysregulation in Fetal Reproductive Tissue Differentiation and > Development by Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals - 2016 ** > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov_pmc_articles_PMC5017538_&d=DwID-g&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=fMPlylSKxgSuo8NFGP6FKyylXNjO4KyTHt9sMDT9hGM&s=4qbs_PorM2216qB-f3EeHlFYTqqBDAMsyPM8Z9WKLwo&e= > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov_pmc_articles_PMC5017538_&d=DwID-g&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=fMPlylSKxgSuo8NFGP6FKyylXNjO4KyTHt9sMDT9hGM&s=4qbs_PorM2216qB-f3EeHlFYTqqBDAMsyPM8Z9WKLwo&e= > ** > > ** > > Are hasty operations on intersex children becoming a thing of the > past? - 2020 > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.theguardian.com_lifeandstyle_2020_jul_14_intersex-2Dchildren-2Dhasty-2Doperations&d=DwID-g&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=fMPlylSKxgSuo8NFGP6FKyylXNjO4KyTHt9sMDT9hGM&s=94Z-FjGI9eMcThoJTesyq0GFggysTjCZg72693BEZ-4&e= > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.theguardian.com_lifeandstyle_2020_jul_14_intersex-2Dchildren-2Dhasty-2Doperations&d=DwID-g&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=fMPlylSKxgSuo8NFGP6FKyylXNjO4KyTHt9sMDT9hGM&s=94Z-FjGI9eMcThoJTesyq0GFggysTjCZg72693BEZ-4&e= > > ** > > There is a movement to consider how language and labeling affect > people, so the concept of DSD is changing from Disorders in Sex > Development to /Differences/ in Sex Development. > > > > I was super-busy during the week of Mother’s Day contributions so I > hope this will count! > > (I work full time and usually cook dinner, but that is another story > about assumed gender roles.) > > Corinne > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:*tree of knowledge system discussion > <[log in to unmask] > <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> on behalf of Michael Mascolo > <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 18, 2021 12:57 PM > *To:* [log in to unmask] > <mailto:[log in to unmask]> > <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> > *Subject:* Re: TOK Psychology Prof Removed From APA Discussion After > Saying There Are Only 2 Genders (*Newsweek*) > > *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click > links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the > content is safe. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Hi Nicholas and All: > > I want to respond to the Staddon issue, the likes of which seems to be > increasing over time. You will recall that Staddon was ousted from a > list serve for a posted entitled, "d "Hmm... Binary view of sex false? > What is the evidence? Is there a Z chromosome?” > > Nicholas had a lot of thoughtful and passionate responses to this > issue. I want to reply as best as I can. Nicholas writes: > > gender, on the other hand, is totally fluid, role depedent, and as > such resides well within the Person-Culutre plane, whereas sex is > in the Animal-Mind plane, that seems a fairly obvious distinction > to me that no one argues. > > The statement that “gender is totally fluid” is a strong one. But what > does it mean? And is it true? What evidence exists to support this > assertion? What would it mean to say that gender is “totally fluid”? > Well, here’s one version: It must mean that there are no constraints > on one’s gender identity, that it can change within individuals along > a dimension (or not) according to…well, what? Whim? Circumstance? If > this is so, then why do I experience my gender identity as stable? > Why don’t I change it? Doesn’t the stability of gender identity for > man people suggest that any strong notion that “gender is totally > fluid” cannot be true? How can something be totally fluid, yet stable > for many many people? > > It would seem that this assertion must be modified somewhat. A more > reasonable statement might be that gender is fluid — but not totally > fluid. In making this seemingly minor adjustment, it becomes possible > to see that there is both stability and variation in gender identity — > both within and between people. And when we make that observation, we > can begin to ask: What accounts for the stability and variation? > > To address this question, we need a clear conception of what we mean > by gender, a clear conception of the nature of the constraints that > govern human development, and clear methods for assessing the sources > of stability and variability. In my view, the best contemporary > models of human development are epigenetic ones — these maintain that > anatomical and psychological structures emerge from the mutual > influence of genes and embedded environments. That is — that genes and > environments are inseparable as causal processes in development. They > affect each other in complex ways. > > Note how prevailing concepts of gender — the ones that suggest that > gender and sex are separate and independent processes — goes against > the core of the epigenetic approach. If it is true that anatomical > and psychological structures emerge through the mutual influence of > genes and environments, then there is not psychological process that > is not a product of relations between genes and environment. If this > is so, it is simply incoherent to say that psychological or social > gender is independent of biology or sex. > > But this is what is often asserted — that gender is “socially > constructed” and sex is “biological”. One doesn’t have to go very far > to gain prima facie evidence that sex and gender are not independent — > and thus that “gender” is not simply unconstrained and “totally” > fluid. That evidence is in the transgender experience itself. When > very young children — 3 year-olds — begin to reject their assigned > gender (mostly biological males, as I understand it), they do so very > much against the social grain. Against all social experience, they > claim an opposing gender. How could this be possible if gender were > unconstrained, "totally fluid”, or independent of biology or > biological sex? The very phenomenon of early-onset transgender > experiences suggests that such experiences are not simply “socially > constructed” (that terms remains undefined in most popular accounts). > The idea that a young child may experience the self in terms of a > gender that is opposed to the assigned one even suggests that there is > something constrained and biologically canalized about /the experience > and meaning of gender itself — /otherwise, how could we even begin to > explain such processes? > > The moment one begins to look at the arguments and data on issues of > gender from outside of an ideological perspective, one cannot help but > see deep contradictions. The idea that gender is socially > constructed or totally fluid contradicts the early onset of stable > transgender experiences. We are told that gender is socially > constructed, but that people are able to choose their own gender. > That is a contradiction. We are told that gender is independent of > sex, when modern epigenetic theory suggests that biology and > environment are never independent processes — that is a contradiction. > We are told that gender and sex are distinct and independent, yet our > very concepts of masculine and feminine have their social and > historical origins in biological distinctions and dispositions. The > literature that suggests that biological differences between XX and XY > individuals bias psychological development to move along different > pathways is overwhelming — as is the evidence attesting to the > importance of the socio-cultural systems (within which biological > processes function) in the development of gender-related processes. > > The issue is more complex than any simple set of distinctions is going > to suggest to us. We should resist reductive explanations — whether > they reduce complex behavior downward to biology or upward to culture. > > My Best, > > Mike > > *Michael F. Mascolo, Ph.D.* > > Academic Director, Compass Program > Professor, Department of Psychology > Merrimack College, North Andover, MA 01845 > 978.837.3503 (office) > 978.979.8745 (cell) > > Bridging Political Divides Website: Creating Common Ground > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.creatingcommonground.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=RMQT0ZMKX4K50YmAKWIQFSqIaVo1QC1SfTP-zWNxCMM&s=JboXmo_2hs999F31_R7UIWyWdSnenwHd4eGiaNxEd3k&e=> > Blog: Values Matter > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.psychologytoday.com_us_blog_values-2Dmatter&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=RMQT0ZMKX4K50YmAKWIQFSqIaVo1QC1SfTP-zWNxCMM&s=hpDDPtVA3qQnOgKOTF8shAdAXzyNRlp0zvyHeTzh31E&e=> > Journal: Pedagogy and the Human Sciences > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__scholarworks.merrimack.edu_phs_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=RMQT0ZMKX4K50YmAKWIQFSqIaVo1QC1SfTP-zWNxCMM&s=vlq-bNOkK3yBgYGOFZSjjjzgprhHHKjROa1w8Sx3n5k&e=> > Author and Coaching Website: www.michaelmascolo.com > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.michaelmascolo.com&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=RMQT0ZMKX4K50YmAKWIQFSqIaVo1QC1SfTP-zWNxCMM&s=JbEGQIsvfkKydozVqCMExhFJpn8LwTppvTBUbOSeNlU&e=> > Academia Home Page > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__merrimack.academia.edu_MichaelMascolo&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=RMQT0ZMKX4K50YmAKWIQFSqIaVo1QC1SfTP-zWNxCMM&s=6TVZ9jKsQuD5tPRp3FKW5A_RAwZXLoJXke2HG4Qiyd8&e=> > Constructivist Meetup Series > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.constructivistmeetup.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=RMQT0ZMKX4K50YmAKWIQFSqIaVo1QC1SfTP-zWNxCMM&s=bQOAa_lzY42S054lFGkXDUZlHDVqZPWbKSncQKqC-eI&e=> > > Things move, persons act. -- Kenneth Burke > If it's not worth doing, it's not worth doing well. -- Donald Hebb > > > > On May 17, 2021, at 7:53 PM, Nicholas Lattanzio > <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: > > *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click > links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know > the content is safe. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > I mean, he had to be totally tone deaf to the current cultural > climate to try and use science to argue something as fluid as > gender. This issue is still too often conflated as to how many > sexes and genders there are. Even in what you shared above there > are references to mainly biological sex, which, scientifically > speaking there are at least 4 or 5 of (even though they are mainly > genetic abnormalities they are still regarded as separate sexes); > gender, on the other hand, is totally fluid, role depedent, and as > such resides well within the Person-Culutre plane, whereas sex is > in the Animal-Mind plane, that seems a fairly obvious distinction > to me that no one argues. > > Let us also keep in mind that he was only removed from a listserv, > not a position, meaning that the consensus amongst his immediate > peers was that they did not want to hear him speak on these points > in such a manner, which he apparently had done one too many times. > > The way I see it, if someone wants to identify themselves as a > male or a female or nonbinary or fluid, it doesn't concern me > (literally, it is not a concern of mine to have). For all I care > people can identify as (and I have met and worked with many who > do) wolves, vampires, elves, etc., I honestly wouldn't take issue > with people identifying as donut or a chair, why make it a big > deal? This is a discussion of gender, which needs to be firmly > disentangled from sex, as the two are really only related so > closely through history with gender emerging from the roles those > of the male or female sex were by and large stratified to in the > same way that races and ethnicities have been. Gender is so much > more than that. If there is an issue to be had here, it is with > the reasoning through which one tends to identify with particular > genders or really the way they construct their identity to begin > with. For example, I cannot tell you how many patients I have > worked with who are so determined to have dissociative personality > disorder, but who clearly do not (and I mean clearly - quoting > movies verbatim). It is intensely frustrating to work with these > individuals if I am fixated on them coming off of their ludacris > act, but when I started to ask what must they think and feel about > themselves to want to be so severely mentally ill? And in that > question lies functional and purposeful answers about what I have > called the Identity Crisis in today's world. People are starved of > identity, from which they have been misconstrued to find meaning > and purpose in some identity instead of learning to find their > identity and pull meaning and purpose from it. It is in this > pursuit of identity for the sake of identity that postmodern > sensibilities find their faults, and modernism is for sure to blame. > > I am not saying that gender identity is to the extreme of those > feigning multiple personalities, nor am I saying it is merely a > manner in which they can stand apart or find a group to connect to > (though this is an integral part of any role). What it is is > people finding themselves in an ever complexifying and > diversifying cultural wasteland. To fight this is the modernist's > last ditch effort to maintain control over younger generations > that don't hold the same value to science as older ones, for > brutishly formed scientific enterprises exactly like this. > > I am a White male. That is a scientific fact with regard to my > race and my sex. There's no argument to be had there. > > I like to cook, I like to act, I love to play sports and video > games, I also do yoga classes (led by women and almost exclusively > with women) 3-4 times a week, yet I retain my roughly 90% > heterosexuality. I could easily choose to identify as non-binary > or something else and I would pretty easily be able to assume such > a role because I am already playing it, that I am playing it as a > White male seems to be what makes the difference (i.e., no one has > trouble with me identifying as a male, but I guarantee there would > be aversion, even faintly, to my identification as something not > male); exactly what that difference is and why it is I'm not too > sure, but that it has to do with power, privilege, and ultimately > Culture is certain, and in that sense a bit sickening to think how > deeply programmed that root aspect of my place in the world as a > social creature is. > > When Dr. Staddon learns how to be a social being then he can get > off of his self-mandated high horse and join the rest of us in > this muck from which meta-modernism arises and transcends both > identity/culture and animal/mind. If only it were so easy for all > of us to be so sure of ourselves, but then again being sure of > oneself to such a degree has always been the easy, unquestioning > way of the living fool. The suffering and pain of those skeptical > transformations he refuses to acknowledge will only leave himself > behind in that regard. > > Regards, > > Nicholas G. Lattanzio, Psy.D. > > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 7:50 AM Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx > <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: > > This is an interesting story. Although I don’t know John > Staddon well, I have had some correspondence with him. > > Best, > Gregg > > *From:* Ken Pope [mailto:[log in to unmask] > <mailto:[log in to unmask]>] > *Sent:* May-15-21 7:51 AM > *Subject:* Psychology Prof Removed From APA Discussion After > Saying There Are Only 2 Genders (*Newsweek*) > > /Newsweek/includes an article: "Neuroscience Professor Removed > From APA Discussion After Saying There Are Only Two Genders” > by Julia Marnin. > > Here are some excerpts: > > [begin excerpts] > > A neuroscience professor was ousted from the American > Psychological Association's (APA) email discussion group by > vote after suggesting that there are only two genders as well > as past concerns over his posts, the College Fix reported Friday. > > Psychology and neuroscience professor John Staddon at Duke > University was removed from the APA's Society for Behavioral > Neuroscience and Comparative Psychology (SBNCP) Division 6 > listserv and was notified via email by the group's > presidential trio who said use of the forum was a "privilege," > in the statements republished by the National Association of > Scholars (NAS) on April 30. > > "It is sad that an audience of supposed scientists is unable > to take any dissenting view, such as the suggestion that there > really are only two sexes," Staddon said in reply to the > notification of his removal from the division's group before > allowing NAS to publish the email exchange. "Incredible! I > don't mind having one less distraction, but I think you should > really be concerned at Div 6's unwillingness to tolerate > divergent views." > > His post that "tipped the scale," according to Staddon, was > titled "Hmm... Binary view of sex false? What is the evidence? > Is there a Z chromosome?" Staddon told /Newsweek/ he created > the post on April 15. > > "Science, real science, can and should be isolated from > politics. Science has values, to be sure—curiosity, honesty, > openness to debate, adherence to empirical facts, and so > on—but they are not, and should not be, political," he wrote > to /Newsweek/. > > "Most of my comments have been devoted to that fact. I might > add that a sense of humor would help." > > Staddon said he received the email that declared his removal > from the division's group on April 23. It was written by > Indiana University Bloomington provost Jonathan Crystal, who > is a professor of psychological and brain sciences, on behalf > of the division's presidential trio. > > "The division leadership has received complaints about some of > the posts that you have sent to the division listserv," > Crystal wrote, who attached a link to SBNCP's 2019 code of > conduct in the email. > > "I do not want to get into the particulars of the range of > complaints over the years, but I will note that a number of > members of the executive committee and others have voiced > concerns publicly on the listserv in an attempt to make you > aware of how readers of the list might view some of the > posts," Crystal added before writing that the executive > committee voted to remove Staddon's email address from the > listserv. > > "I can find nothing that should be considered personally > offensive," Staddon said after perusing through old emails. > > /Newsweek/reached out to Crystal for comment, but did not hear > back in time for publication. > > "This incident just illustrates the current inability of some > scientific communities to tolerate dissent about issues > related to sex and race. Psychology and sociology seem to be > especially flawed in this respect." Staddon wrote in an email > to the College Fix. > > <snip> > > On April 22, he wrote an article for /Psychology Today/ that > discussed APA guidelines and criticized the organization for > compromising "both scientists and practitioners." > > "For the scientists, freedom of speech and inquiry are > prerequisites. The APA should certainly advocate for those and > for the highest research standards," he wrote in the article. > > NAS published the emails between Staddon and Crystal under > "Cancel Culture in the Sciences: A Case Study," as part of the > organization's broader effort "to counter cancel culture in > higher education," according to the editor's note. > > <snip> > > Staddon has done recent theoretical research on operant > conditioning, memory, timing and psychobiological aspects of > ethical and economic philosophy, according to his Duke > University scholar page. > > He has authored six books and written more than 200 research > papers. > > Newsweek also reached out to the APA for comment but did not > hear back in time for publication. > > [end excerpts] > > Ken Pope > > *Ken Pope, Melba J.T. Vasquez, Nayeli Y. Chavez-Dueñas, & > Hector Y. Adames:///Ethics in Psychotherapy & Counseling: A > Practical Guide, 6th Edition/ > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dmanalytics2.com_click-3Fu-3Dhttps-253A-252F-252Fkspope.com-252Fethics-252Fethics.php-26i-3D1-26d-3D-5FQhtScGHSJm6Bz8tnhbVZw-26e-3DDr.Milan.Pomichalek-2540nbrhc.on.ca-26a-3D4TgwGavaTo2DhdkMyyiDuQ-26s-3DlJ6bCHFZBnI&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=wjF8cZoiFchamTuxBdDEmw&m=VpaleO_sJPDs26X4tPNNHCGItYTRv2frifqzQSmHd_Y&s=SBfLEGClwE3-7iGKNmRPKaNJTC7HMOh_fT27VCCSqmw&e=> (publication > date June 2021—John Wiley & Sons currently accepting preorders > & faculty requests for evaluation copies)* > > Pope:Anti-Racism & Racism in Psychology as a Science, > Discipline, & Profession: 57 Articles & Books (Citations + > Summaries) > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dmanalytics2.com_click-3Fu-3Dhttps-253A-252F-252Fkspope.com-252Fethics-252Fanti-2Dracism.php-26i-3D2-26d-3D-5FQhtScGHSJm6Bz8tnhbVZw-26e-3DDr.Milan.Pomichalek-2540nbrhc.on.ca-26a-3D4TgwGavaTo2DhdkMyyiDuQ-26s-3DjxB49fD-5FMhs&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=wjF8cZoiFchamTuxBdDEmw&m=VpaleO_sJPDs26X4tPNNHCGItYTRv2frifqzQSmHd_Y&s=-2rT5GDX_y9s2tCNnuneC-GyboFKJiK2xhx4glzaCCU&e=> > > Pope: A Human Rights & Ethics Crisis Facing the World's > Largest Organization of Psychologists > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dmanalytics2.com_click-3Fu-3Dhttps-253A-252F-252Fkspope.com-252Fapa-252Fcrisis.php-26i-3D3-26d-3D-5FQhtScGHSJm6Bz8tnhbVZw-26e-3DDr.Milan.Pomichalek-2540nbrhc.on.ca-26a-3D4TgwGavaTo2DhdkMyyiDuQ-26s-3DuwGSM0Spjn4&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=wjF8cZoiFchamTuxBdDEmw&m=VpaleO_sJPDs26X4tPNNHCGItYTRv2frifqzQSmHd_Y&s=AIBfqmTzG88FzGNQTpf1M7Au_iCEI4O5m9DSGQxHGtk&e=> > > *“Hear the other side.” * > > *—Saint Augustine (354-430 AD)* > > You can unsubscribe from the Psychology News List by replying > and putting "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the Subject line (or by clicking > here:Unsubscribe > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dmanalytics2.com_delivery-2Dunsubscribe-3Fd-3D-5FQhtScGHSJm6Bz8tnhbVZw-26e-3DDr.Milan.Pomichalek-2540nbrhc.on.ca-26a-3D4TgwGavaTo2DhdkMyyiDuQ-26f-3D&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=wjF8cZoiFchamTuxBdDEmw&m=VpaleO_sJPDs26X4tPNNHCGItYTRv2frifqzQSmHd_Y&s=PJ39nCuNhWbEd1QSY8J9Bsp9Q-8Ef591kLZE93wE8hA&e=>). > > . > > *Caution: This message came from outside the organization. > Please do not click links or open attachments unless you are > sure of their source.* > > > > The information contained in this electronic transmission is > intended for the person(s) or entity to whom it is addressed. > Delivery of this message to any person other than the intended > recipient(s) is not intended in any way to waive > confidentiality. This material may contain confidential or > personal information which may be subject to the provisions of > Ontario's Personal Health Information Protection Act. Any > review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of this > information by entities other than the intended recipient is > prohibited. If you receive this in error, please contact the > sender and delete the material immediately. > > L'information contenue dans ce message électronique est > destinée uniquement au destinataire ou aux destinataires > visés. La transmission de ce message à une personne autre que > son destinataire ou ses destinataires visés ne supprime en > rien l'obligation d'en respecter la confidentialité. Ce > message peut contenir des renseignements de nature > confidentielle ou personnelle qui pourraient être soumis aux > dispositions de la Loi de 2004 sur la protection des > renseignements personnels sur la santé. L'examen, la > retransmission, la diffusion et toute autre utilisation de > l'information contenue dans ce message par des personnes > autres que le destinataire ou les destinataires visés sont > interdits. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, veuillez le > supprimer immédiatement et en avertir l'expéditeur. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the > Google Groups "Society for Theoretical and Philosophical > Psychology" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from > it, send an email to > [log in to unmask] > <mailto:[log in to unmask]>. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_msgid_society-2Dfor-2Dtheoretical-2Dand-2Dphilosophical-2Dpsychology_f601ae48d6ff410e882c88185aa8dd0f-2540nbrhc.on.ca&d=DwID-g&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=fMPlylSKxgSuo8NFGP6FKyylXNjO4KyTHt9sMDT9hGM&s=oSwWg_5TrzyWpM9TfzJtHplgTe6XrksbWoD-eDaWag0&e= > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_msgid_society-2Dfor-2Dtheoretical-2Dand-2Dphilosophical-2Dpsychology_f601ae48d6ff410e882c88185aa8dd0f-2540nbrhc.on.ca-3Futm-5Fmedium-3Demail-26utm-5Fsource-3Dfooter&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=wjF8cZoiFchamTuxBdDEmw&m=VpaleO_sJPDs26X4tPNNHCGItYTRv2frifqzQSmHd_Y&s=Unp_MJglsrrdMXZAhOGXq18aQ4GEEK_LI5xMyo3BIIw&e=>. > > ############################ > > To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: > mailto:[log in to unmask] > <mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]> > or click the following link: > http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 > <http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1> > > ############################ > > To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: > mailto:[log in to unmask] > <mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]> or > click the following link: > http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 > <http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1> > > ############################ > > To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: > mailto:[log in to unmask] > <mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]> or > click the following link: > http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 > <http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1> > > ############################ > > To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: > mailto:[log in to unmask] > <mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]> or > click the following link: > http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 > <http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1> > > ############################ > > To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: > mailto:[log in to unmask] > <mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]> or > click the following link: > http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 > <http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1> > -- *Lene Rachel Andersen* Futurist, economist, author & keynote speaker President of Nordic Bildung and co-founder of the European Bildung Network Full member of the Club of Rome *Nordic Bildung* Vermlandsgade 51, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark www.nordicbildung.org +45 28 96 42 40 ############################ To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1