I’ve been contemplating the form of the good, or justice, for some time,
and although I feel like a humble thief in striving to make, or profit,
“sense” of it, by establishing corresponding analogies and extrapolating
valid inferences from what others have said, as carefully as I can…

..and yet still feel conflicted in sharing it,….well, here:

Zero sum. Look at the real number line. Within oneself.

+1
-1

Sameness : 1
Difference: plus vs minus.
Form of the good: 0

“….although the good is not being" it is "superior to it in rank and
power", it is what "provides for knowledge and truth"

When he is trying to answer such difficult questions pertaining to the
definition of justice <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.m.wikipedia.org_wiki_Justice&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=uYUgjjB22c6fnBKSvupT_Tr7iPkqBDW47-YG3gqBTOo&s=VmdoWTrnck4DOeOB4vP3pnXmE7jwCwt9B1lsf7qNKb0&e= >, Plato
identifies that we should not "introduce every form of difference and
sameness in nature" instead we must focus on "the *one form (the oneness) *of
sameness *and* difference that was relevant to the *particular ways of life
themselves”.*

(ego, “I-thought”, neuro-linguistic programs, justifications, memes, mind,
culture, etc)…. *themselves*"

It is "what gives truth to the things known and the power to know to the
knower" (imagination, the intelligible realm)

 It is not only the "cause of knowledge and truth, it is also an object of
knowledge".

An object of knowledge, yet not being?

Now the only inference I can make is that it’s relative to the point of
reference. What is, or is absent, depends on ….?


Equality in knowledge and ignorance, right and wrong, pleasure and pain,
pride and humility, superiority and inferiority, etc….


-- 
-Jamie

############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1