I saw this as well, she pretty well sums up most of the recent problems, though there have been others which they just tweak the models to fit but the new ones don't seem to allow for ad hoc fixes. The real sticking point and reason for a Big Bang model in the first place is the red shift (movement in space or in this case of 'space) data which does have an alternative which is Blue Shift in time or rather of time (frequency). In this model the Universe is infinite/unbounded space, with a medium warped by EM as opposed to space-time warped by mass (GM is derived from Maxwell Heavysides equations, there is a recent paper on that and I think Dr. Hal Puthoff has a talk on this at an advanced propulsion workshop group YouTube), including the Einstein-Dike variable speed of light concept. At the beginning the Universe is a standing wave (large) with harmonics, which develops further (smaller) standing waves on down until Protons and electrons (plasma cosmology) appear and self-organize around the larger wave forms of galaxies and stars. Gravity in this model is a push-force as opposed to a pull-force, and like Mach's Inertia comes from communication with the rest of the Hubble Horizon Universe. In this model Mass is derived from the same force - the information coming into a particle (standing wave) accumulates over time. Which is not liked at all by Materialist. They are all just models some more effective and thought out than others, I would at least open things up and look for new alternatives instead of just continually trying to fix the old.It is an interesting theory, and I would say fits very well with analytical idealism - is it true? Time will tell but as the video says something has got to change. The Webb telescope is going to be very interesting.In the end I think you either have big bang materialism with no consciousness or analytical idealism with something other than a bang explaining what we see. A very interesting time to be alive.Timothy Rollin PickerillBusiness - http://www.AudioVideoArts.com/Photography - http://instagram.com/pickerillphotography/646-299-4173 (cell)############################I am trying to follow developments in the dark energy/dark matter world and found this to be of value:
For those who are wondering, the ToK System does not commit too much to cosmological models, other than the generalized "Big Bang/Big Beginning" frame such that a hot dense radiation energy universe transforms into/gives birth to particles and the Matter dimension.
Best,
Gregg
______________________________________________________________________Gregg Henriques, Ph.D.
Professor
Director, C-I Doc Program
Department of Graduate Psychology
216 Johnston Hall
MSC 7401
James Madison University
Harrisonburg, VA 22807
(540) 568-7857 (phone)
(540) 568-4747 (fax)
Be that which enhances dignity and well-being with integrity.
Check out my Theory of Knowledge blog at Psychology Today at:
From: Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx
Sent: Sunday, September 5, 2021 4:50 PM
To: tree of knowledge system discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: TOK UTOKing with Adriana Forte NailiPlease check out this clip from my UTOKing conversation with Adriana Forte Naili on the nature of feminine and masculine energies:
Gregg Henriques, Ph.D.
Professor
Department of Graduate Psychology
216 Johnston Hall
MSC 7401
James Madison University
Harrisonburg, VA 22807
(540) 568-7857 (phone)
(540) 568-4747 (fax)
Be that which enhances dignity and well-being with integrity.Check out the Unified Theory Of Knowledge homepage at:
https://www.unifiedtheoryofknowledge.org/
To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1