CAUTION: This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hi Joan,
I don’t have direct experience myself but I’m coediting a book on Cosmolocal Production
with my colleagues Michel Bauwens, Sharon Ede and Dr. Jose Ramos, who does employ futures action research in his work so learning thru his methodology to apply to our projects. See his 2017 paper on FAR:
He is founder of Action Foresight which provides foresight training:
The system our global project group is building for rapid bottom up system change is built around a new decentralized, privacy protected knowledge system software architecture built by Gyuri Lajos. A brief description is available at this hackathon we are involved in:
Gyuri has been developing his ecosystem for 15 years, to realize Doug Englebert’s vision. We will be using it for participatory action research as we onboard individuals and organisations. Since the individual or organization’s data is naturally kept on your server and a copy in the fission.code space (encrypted if private data, non-encrypted if you make your data shareable) any app developed on fission, called an app developed on the edge, is already interoperable with any other app....no need to get a developer to develop API between apps. The most amazing feature is the ability to track any idea as if flows through dynamic groups of conversational participants. Take the conversation around any subject matter in this thread...PAR or stage theory, it would track where the idea goes, as it morphs, is augmented or applied to new contexts. Privacy settings of the users allow it to be tracked within groups. The greatest power is to track public conversation flows to actually see how ideas spread virally at a granular level.
We would be working with Jose and his team to help us apply PAR and FAR within the system to study what methodologies work best to mobilize citizens for community scale collective action.
Since the fission fabric is built upon person-centric framework, it is both privacy protected and app interoperable at the same time. This means different scientific teams can develop apps for functions that will simply interoperate without any extra development work. We need to have earth system researchers who will integrate downscaled planetary boundary and doughnut economic functions, another team to integrate MuSIASEM complexity, nonlinear analysis nexus tool to mitigate progress traps and still others for measuring urban footprint, Potsdam Institutes SCIARA climate change simulation tool and many others. The fission fabric can also seamlessly hold massive datasets, that we expect this project will generate.
--
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
An interesting comment, Gien. I don't see much mention of action research in these kinds of discussions, but personally, I don't think we can move forward without the systematic, dynamically mutually informing relationship between theory and practice that is action research. I have just submitted a major bid to the Templeton Foundation on 'guiding cultural evolution through participatory action research'. Statistically, a very small chance of it being accepted, but the more I listen to intellectual discussions, the more I want to collaboratively explore - not just in words but in reflexive, evaluated actions - the implications for our intellectual ideas for how we live our lives on a daily basis.
For those who are not familiar with action research, this is an extract from the bid : "Participatory Action Research is a cyclical, collaborative form of inquiry, which involves researchers and participants working together to understand problematic situations, and to change them for the better. It centres on developing dynamic, mutually informing relationships between theory, reflection and practice, in order to choose the most beneficial action. A form of feedback is incorporated that allows participants to fine-tune their actions, and ensure they are on-course to achieve their aims, in ways that stay true to their values. PAR has a long and well proven history, the origins of which can be traced back to the ideas of John Dewey, developed by Kurt Lewin in his creation of action research as a means of taking a systematic approach to democratic change within the community."
Gien, I would be interested to know more about your experience of action research, and why you indicated its significance at this point in time?
All best,############################
Joan
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
John Varvaeke’s work on the meaning crisis will surface in relevance, integrated with ToK. Action research is where I see things headed...--
Thanks, Gien.
You make a very important point. While I think it makes sense for us to track this and feel it at some level, it would be doubly tragic for individuals to project inevitable collapse and then emotionally collapse in their own local gardens as a function of that misplaced entanglement. We definitely need clarity and guidance and reflective adaptive framing to ensure that we relate to hyper-objects with appropriate vision and affectivity (i.e., our emotions are signals that then orient us…but we must be clear about what they are signaling and what we are orienting to).
As such, I appreciate your framing here.
Best,Gregg
From: tree of knowledge system discussion <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of James Gien Wong
Sent: Thursday, September 2, 2021 3:32 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: TOK Troubling Environmental News
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Yes, it's been quite the story! I think it’s making people feel a little more helpless. This year has been a landmark year for extreme weather and more noticeable signs of tipping points, which is both good and bad. Bad, for obvious reasons but good because it’s getting decision makers to finally take climate change seriously. But bad again, because it may come to past as waking up to the reality a little bit late.
############################
Human beings are not very well equipped to interpret hyperobjects (Morton) like climate change as a threat. That has allowed political, business leaders and a large percentage of the general public to exercise cognitive biases to collectively ignore the pressing science of the last five decades.
Unfortunately, no "climate) news is good news. New discoveries of climate science are usually bad news because climate scientists are usually conservative by nature. the profesisonal pyschiatrists and pyschologists in this network will see increased caseloads for eco-counseling as most people are not good at terror management. As climate change's predicted impacts being to move from predictions into experienced reality, mortality salience is going to drive more depression, nihilism, addiction, fear, anger and violence as people try to find a way to cope with the existential threat of extinction, We are already seeing a new normality of chaos.
I'm doing my bit by working with other networks to develop a cybernetic system along the line of Doug Englebert's vision of Collective IQ:
for rapid whole system change and launching a call to action for builders to help build it at COP26. Working with knowledge architect Gyuri Lajos and a team rapidly coalescing around him to build a rapid system change platform for humanity:
At this time, it behooves all of us to find our leverage points where we can each make the biggest difference, as the time window for action shrinks rapidly with each passing day.
On Thu, 2 Sep 2021 at 15:07, Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Hi Folks,
People have probably seen this, but if not, it is good to at least be aware of. It is one of the more trouble environmental signals I have seen in a while (and there have been no shortage of such signals lately)…
Best,
Gregg
___________________________________________
Gregg Henriques, Ph.D.
Professor
Department of Graduate Psychology
216 Johnston Hall
MSC 7401
James Madison University
Harrisonburg, VA 22807
(540) 568-7857 (phone)
(540) 568-4747 (fax)
Be that which enhances dignity and well-being with integrity.Check out the Unified Theory Of Knowledge homepage at:
https://www.unifiedtheoryofknowledge.org/
############################
To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
############################
To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
############################Wishing you WELLthGienFuture Ancestor
Pull a thread here and you’ll find it’s attached to the rest of the world. - Nadeem Aslam
To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
############################Wishing you WELLthGienFuture Ancestor
Pull a thread here and you’ll find it’s attached to the rest of the world. - Nadeem Aslam
To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1