It seems to me, regarding bio-mental-culture, that it’s the *number* that’s the unit of culture more than the *word*….or you could say that every word is in some sense a number itself, relative to *i*… I’m suspecting. Culture must be imaginary, as is our pragmatic way of seeing, …but when did the physical and imaginary meet…or part? On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 7:47 PM Peter Lloyd Jones <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click links > or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is > safe. > ------------------------------ > Complexity + growth + ignorance + power + intelligence + egoism + love + > denial + insight + destruction = -1 > > > Peter Lloyd Jones > 562-209-4080 > [log in to unmask] > > Sent by determined causes that no amount of will is able to thwart. > > > > > > > > On Sep 3, 2021, at 6:09 PM, Jamie D <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Complexity, growth, ignorance, power, intelligence, egoism, love, denial, > insight, and destruction > > > ############################ > > To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: > mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the > following link: > http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 > -- -Jamie ############################ To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1