Since the memes, egos, justifications, etc…are words, used to build the individual’s ontology within the subjective relativity timeframe whereby the person engenders experience….investing “I-thoughts” (‘I am’ the prize)
…and if Either/or…described (I think) by Kierkegaard and others as (my interpretation) ..the world-line ToK of good and evil….corresponding with the troubling paradox of free choice and destiny (that must be mere bloodsport) …both our collective and my personal bondage to the delusion of evil … evil or death I’m regarding as merely family.
Also, ‘forgive them for they know not what they do’ is either absurd, since His killers obviously had eyes to see they were killing a man …or it means something more banal, regarding the relative Word (frame) and choice attention paid….and engendering experience IS birth AND death.
(thankfully Greggs’ ToK is merely knowledge … or a tool, nothing more, nothing less)
“For whom is there inside or outside? There can be, only so long as there are other(ed) subject, and the (sense - world) object (relative to desire). For whom are these two again? Both resolve into the subject. See who is in the subject”
- Ramana Maharshi
(The implications of this expression are ….I can’t even say….it seems to reconcile
the either/or problem without choosing ignorance nor to attain a burden of knowledge)
That the body (sense object) is not apart from the subject is knowledge (what knowledge is).
Every ‘thing’ known itself must also be ignorance of what could be known in its place ….of the sense object….the person.