Brandon, thanks for starting it! :-) On 11-01-2022 04:14, Brandon Norgaard wrote: > *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click > links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the > content is safe. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > I just published the article to Medium > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__medium.com_-40brandon-5F29259_comparing-2Dapproaches-2Dto-2Daddressing-2Dthe-2Dmeta-2Dcrisis-2D9393e6ee17d7&d=DwIDaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=KTfFpic9FBU54etRvWCqe8uZBI8Hr6rJUSOczzx_MkY&s=FADCZEGfCWbxHwTddK1ZwADfnNo1JnyLZH1ZB-0T2QU&e= > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__medium.com_-40brandon-5F29259_comparing-2Dapproaches-2Dto-2Daddressing-2Dthe-2Dmeta-2Dcrisis-2D9393e6ee17d7&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=G8D-u0XMYnU5q7vP3xzAJG7Dn7g4n0t2bPTqK8M9Nko&s=0GPrSMloymQ9djiwc04_MONDqhPUrApmzua1oqKi6sM&e=> > > > It’s cool that just by circulating early drafts of this, it started a > conversation and helped inspire other related work and the creation of > other documents. Thanks to everyone who helped me with this. I > figure that some of us could further collaborate in the future and > create an entire educational course around this central theme of > comparing emergent solutions and approaches to addressing the meta-crisis. > > Brandon Norgaard > > /The Enlightened Worldview Project/ > > *From:* theory of knowledge society discussion > <[log in to unmask]> *On Behalf Of *lee simplyquality.org > *Sent:* Monday, January 10, 2022 7:02 PM > *To:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* Re: TOK: Evaluating solution proposals emerging from the > meta-crisis > > *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click > links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the > content is safe. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Alexander, > > Thanks for these comments. > > I remain confident that sound arguments are preferable to unsound > arguments. > > Jokes and other creative tasks are also welcome, and are in no way > excluded by preferring sound arguments over unsound ones. > > Note that “Playing” is advocated in row 33, also, “humor” is one of > the virtues listed when following the “Moral virtues” link (cell J5). > > (I am assimilating all the comments I am receiving and creating a > version 2.0 of the chart. That version now includes a row for > “creativity”.) > > Each of the “inhibiting institutions” are welcome to cease inhibiting. > For example, it is not controversial to recognize that “Unbridled > social media” does amplify distrust, argumentation, trivia, false > narratives, and fear. > > I am not making the sweeping claim that social media is only bad, > however it does promote the unhelpful conditions listed. > > It seems helpful to make clear distinctions between the values, > forces, and conditions we want to advance and those we want to > diminish. That is what I am attempting to make clear in each row of > the table. If you can suggest alternative scoring of specific cells, > please let me know. > > I hope this is clear, accurate, and helpful. > > Thanks, > > Lee Beaumont > > > > On Jan 10, 2022, at 10:25 AM, Alexander Herwix <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > > *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click > links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know > the content is safe. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Dear Lee, > > I only had a quick look at the table you shared. Given that as a > caveat, I must say the table looks like a systematic and > potentially useful way of presenting your assessment. However, a > concern that I have is that the framing in terms of „forces to > diminish“ and „forces to strengthen“ may profit from some more > contextualization. For instance, if you were to replace all > „unsound argumentation“ with „sound arguments“ would this leave > room for jokes, other creative tasks, innovation or even the > process of learning itself? According to Voigt et al. (2013) based > on the work of Seidel et al. (2010) one way to think about the > nuances involved here could be that there is at least a need for > "pockets of creativity“. > > Also and maybe more profoundly, it seems like the way you set this > scoring up it would not be possible for one of the „inhibiting > institutions“ to champion „solution approaches“ or the other way > around. Couldn't framing it this way lead to partisanism? Is this > really what we want? How normative should one be in this > discussion? Making reasonable tradeoffs between so many > potentially conflicting values doesn’t seem easy. > > Hope these comments are helpful to you. > > Cheers, Alexander Herwix > > # References > > Seidel, S., Müller-Wienbergen, F., and Rosemann, M. 2010. “Pockets > of Creativity in Business Processes,” /Communications of the > Association for Information Systems/ (27). > (https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__doi.org_10.17705_1CAIS.02723&d=DwIDaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=KTfFpic9FBU54etRvWCqe8uZBI8Hr6rJUSOczzx_MkY&s=WZ1m2maOMALdLZcf1u2BbrZ4X3K18uHlL4E1C_YHYk4&e= > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__doi.org_10.17705_1CAIS.02723&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=lyG5nS5uwtDZYu7lw495UzN6Oe_VtlQi8oDKsELWyrw&s=aHWs0ZmimYWQKSJRsAjS8xbAsRje8MFpWnBkV0Aq-KQ&e=>). > > Voigt, M., Bergener, K., and Becker, J. 2013. “Comprehensive > Support for Creativity-Intensive Processes: An Explanatory > Information System Design Theory,” /Business & Information Systems > Engineering/ (5:4), pp. 227–242. > (https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__doi.org_10.1007_s12599-2D013-2D0272-2D6&d=DwIDaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=KTfFpic9FBU54etRvWCqe8uZBI8Hr6rJUSOczzx_MkY&s=zaEAcXnOjZFIAGjqi322MaB9m98lgTCf5FlTlvI_C7Y&e= > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__doi.org_10.1007_s12599-2D013-2D0272-2D6&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=lyG5nS5uwtDZYu7lw495UzN6Oe_VtlQi8oDKsELWyrw&s=B510-7k6KguqoaTG4Bl1B2sdoiB3lPmNy6c6MDk8um4&e=>). > > — > > Alexander Herwix > > [log in to unmask] > > > > Am 10.01.2022 um 14:23 schrieb lee simplyquality.org > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__simplyquality.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=lyG5nS5uwtDZYu7lw495UzN6Oe_VtlQi8oDKsELWyrw&s=SI5kqX5yEcZBXYPrBpNK6P07i-on8nRfw1aYX7b8Is4&e=> > <[log in to unmask]>: > > *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not > click links or open attachments unless you recognize the > sender and know the content is safe. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Lene, > > Waldemar, > > Nik, > > Thanks for your careful review of the solutions proposals chart. > > Please allow me to continue our dialogue. > > I am reluctant to add “Education” as a row because it is > important to differentiate how we learn from what we learn, > and discovering reality from propaganda, indoctrination, > ideology, and other forms of disinformation. > > Regarding “how we learn” the chart includes: accurate > self-image, skillful dialogue, focusing on what matters, > thinking clearly, facing facts, evaluating evidence, embracing > reality, seeking true beliefs, accurate worldview, sound > arguments, thinking scientifically, knowing how you know, > intellectual honesty, learning through inquiry, and global > perspective. > > Perhaps I should add: literacy, numeracy, and life skills to > the list. > > See: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wikiversity.org_wiki_Living-5FWisely-23What-5FIs&d=DwIDaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=KTfFpic9FBU54etRvWCqe8uZBI8Hr6rJUSOczzx_MkY&s=O56K7TSUKh7wm9ZYFvegyMmuzw1KEsJlQeDOG4JT9yk&e= > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wikiversity.org_wiki_Living-5FWisely-23What-5FIs&d=DwMGaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=oQsuMcAwd6PtX7a5p3mM19pPl-YZgPqGqBuqM_n_ULE&s=wvfUP_JM4nOJ3Babss6uaGFoDnzrYYXiODffnRcnIF0&e=> > > Regarding “responsibility”, I started the list by beginning > with the pyramid at: > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wikiversity.org_wiki_Living-5FWisely&d=DwIDaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=KTfFpic9FBU54etRvWCqe8uZBI8Hr6rJUSOczzx_MkY&s=KBt1W1YCxRTy8_PtIWvjV6mYDQzJdtesDzr39Sagd0I&e= > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wikiversity.org_wiki_Living-5FWisely&d=DwMGaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=oQsuMcAwd6PtX7a5p3mM19pPl-YZgPqGqBuqM_n_ULE&s=MgrPZ1ppRKzDaci9mESpl69Rl26CMiY74VN7l_dQQis&e=> > > Notice that foundation layer is labeled “Responsibility”, > although that term does not (yet) appear in the list of forces. > > I do include moral virtue, which hyperlinks to civility, > fidelity, wisdom, temperance, courage, justice, generosity, > compassion, mercy, gratitude, humility, simplicity, tolerance, > purity, tolerance, gentleness, good faith, humor, love, good, > and moral integration. > > The concept of “drive” or “initiative” may be lacking and > perhaps I can add something along this lines. > > I also directly link to earning trust, accurate self-image, > and focusing on what matters. > > What in your concept of “responsibility” is lacking from this > list? > > Regarding “Play” I include “Playing” in cell J33. > > Imagination is the topic of the “Possibilities” tier on the > wisdom pyramid. > > I am developing materials at: > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wikiversity.org_wiki_Living-5FWisely-23Possibilities&d=DwIDaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=KTfFpic9FBU54etRvWCqe8uZBI8Hr6rJUSOczzx_MkY&s=XyBTwk-aalxeWP2m8RdKPAnPsOQUTWuaVVjK47edFps&e= —What_Can_Be > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wikiversity.org_wiki_Living-5FWisely-23Possibilities-25E2-2580-2594What-5FCan-5FBe&d=DwMGaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=oQsuMcAwd6PtX7a5p3mM19pPl-YZgPqGqBuqM_n_ULE&s=CYtmShTvIhXbNfdk4BnRVU9gKqhaew83OiSR-b0bHps&e=> on > this topic. > > The table includes “Creating possibilities for making > progress” on row 31. Perhaps I can add “creativity” explicitly > to the list. > > Thanks! > > Lee Beaumont > > > > On Jan 9, 2022, at 10:56 PM, Waldemar Schmidt > <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do > not click links or open attachments unless you recognize > the sender and know the content is safe. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Lee: > > I would like to second Lene’s comment. > > I believe that the “force” which is fundamental to moving > us in the direction of “out of the crisis” is that of > education. > > In your grading system, I would give that a 15. > > In the absence of a breadth and depth of education none of > the other factors leading out can compete with the factors > contributing to the crisis. > > The past 4 years in American politics has proven that! > > Nonetheless, good useful work you have done - I hope to > see more of it! > > Best regards, > > Waldemar > > > > On Jan 9, 2022, at 7:35 PM, Lene Rachel Andersen > <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. > Do not click links or open attachments unless you > recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Hi Lee, > > Interesting way of setting it up. > > Among the forces to the right I would also include: > responsibility, education, play, and imagination. > > / Lene > > On 07-01-2022 15:07, Nicholas Lattanzio wrote: > > *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of > JMU. Do not click links or open attachments unless > you recognize the sender and know the content is > safe. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > I think I did it right. I think we should band > certain scores into groups as we all have a ton of > 9's, we may want a better way to differentiate or > score things so that we dont feel like we're > devaluing or overvaluing a certain force (I think > most items where people put the same score they'll > have different explanations for why). > > I'm not too aware of what was discussed at your > previous meeting but that was an observation of > mine. I really like this, definitely want to add > more to it when time is available. > > Regards, > > Nicholas G. Lattanzio, Psy.D. > > On Fri, Jan 7, 2022, 6:20 AM lee simplyquality.org > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__simplyquality.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=Z0ODCMYGi-s0Gl_epMUh67gish9On0rxK825xmFL9K8&s=iE7_ZwmeEOxSJRvHjx9BUtFyx0vRHAICOU1b_BY-HJY&e=> > <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside > of JMU. Do not click links or open attachments > unless you recognize the sender and know the > content is safe. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > TOK Folk, > > Inspired by Brandon’s recent work analyzing > proposed solutions to the “meta crisis” I > created the table (excel spreadsheet) included > below. > > I shared this earlier to a subgroup, and I > hope it is worthwhile crossposting here. > > I will greatly appreciate your engagement with > and comments on this nascent work. > > Please: > > 1) Open the spreadsheet > > 2) Relax, calm down, and take a deep breath! > Size the spreadsheet to fit your screen (Use > the slider in the lower right hand corner of > the sheet) (If you can’t open excel, please > let me know and I’ll send something that works > for you.) > > 3) Begin by studying the two columns central > to the spreadsheet. These have the blue header > and form a force-field analysis > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wikipedia.org_wiki_Force-2Dfield-5Fanalysis&d=DwMGaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=wWQfi0Oi3PrZffvvd04z97O_Pme6-5EpbwqqDLrE0Iw&s=B0uj0xKwOwSMiBlXcKwISewF2QgxajboLe4PhFHg1rs&e=>. > The concept of the force field analysis > technique is that the status quo is determined > (and sustained) by a balance (equilibrium) of > forces working to create change in opposition > to those working to resist change. > > 4) The right hand column (in the blue section, > column J) lists the forces, outcomes, goals, > and values that we want to increase and > prevail in our preferred future. Please scan > the rows in this column to decide if each of > these outcomes are desirable, well stated, and > the list is complete. (We want to stay on the > right side of history 😀) Note that most of > these are hyperlinked to more information, > often including more detail. For example, the > “Moral Virtue” cell is linked to course > materials describing 20 individual moral > virtues and supporting materials. This reduces > the need to list individual virtues in the > table, and makes change actionable. > > 5) The left hand column (in the blue section, > column I) lists the forces, outcomes, etc that > we want to diminish. These are typically > stated as the opposite condition of the > opposing pair. Please scan each row in this > column to decide if these are well stated > (opposite of the opposing force). > > 6) Columns K through X (in the green header > section) list the various solution approaches > adapted from the materials Brandon shared, and > also described at: > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wikiversity.org_wiki_Level-5F5-5FResearch-5FCenter_Escaping-5FDiscontent&d=DwIDaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=KTfFpic9FBU54etRvWCqe8uZBI8Hr6rJUSOczzx_MkY&s=hJ80N1_EBCgSXTLN3F6Ustu2IzQGCzq_9h71omSctNM&e= > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wikiversity.org_wiki_Level-5F5-5FResearch-5FCenter_Escaping-5FDiscontent&d=DwMGaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=wWQfi0Oi3PrZffvvd04z97O_Pme6-5EpbwqqDLrE0Iw&s=WJSk2VkLha6ukreoEX6XuBgHqr2TLQboD5860Wkx7iw&e=> (This > is the link under the “Solution Approaches” > header). I have scored cells in some of these > columns (using the Key in cell 59 C) to > indicate the strength of the coupling from > that particular solution to the corresponding > item in the “Forces to strengthen" column. I > have completed a few of the columns I am > familiar with, and will appreciate it if > advocates or experts in other solutions (e.g. > those I have not yet fully scored) can suggest > scores for those solutions. I will appreciate > review of each of the scored cells you have > expertise in by each of you. > > 7) Columns A through H (in the pink header > section) list the various “inhibiting > institutions" that exist today, maintain the > status quo, and are generally opposing the > changes we would like to see. I scored many of > these. Please suggest additional columns and > review my (preliminary) scoring. These headers > are also hyperlinked to materials that begin > to characterize each of these structures. > > 8) Full disclosure, I am creating the “Living > Wisely” curriculum on Wikiversity. These > materials are obviously biased by my work. I > invite your participation to help move toward > a more complete and balanced analysis. > > 9) Row 56 includes the totals for each column. > One interpretation of this number is that it > represents the “strength” of each proposed > solution approach or inhibiting institution. > Note that this sum (currently) assumes equal > weights for each row item. > > I believe this table can help us answer many > of the questions that were raised at Monday’s > meeting and can help us make progress. > > Please feel free to share this widely with > people who might be interested. > > I expect to publish this into the public > domain when it become useful. > > I greatly appreciate your engagement with this > work. Please provide your comments, issues, > observations, questions, or recommendations > via email to me. Also, of you would like a > one-on-one Zoom session to discuss this > further, pleas let me know. > > Thanks for all you help with this. > > Lee Beaumont > > ############################ > > To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: > write to: > mailto:[log in to unmask] > <mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]> > or click the following link: > http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 > <http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1> > > > ############################ > > To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write > to: > mailto:[log in to unmask] > <mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]> > or click the following link: > http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 > <http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1> > > > -- > *Lene Rachel Andersen* > Futurist, economist, author & keynote speaker > President of Nordic Bildung and co-founder of the > European Bildung Network > Full member of the Club of Rome > *Nordic Bildung* > Vermlandsgade 51, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark > www.nordicbildung.org > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.nordicbildung.org&d=DwMDaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=7Ze13Hfl6DfUF4cYN075kEv-XGxIqDXVOhEC56k88ag&s=Wxb8MNkbkXX9ehG-MFC21xBv2eOfdZrgBUPXFMLBXP8&e=> > +45 28 96 42 40 > > ############################ > > To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: > mailto:[log in to unmask] > <mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]> > or click the following link: > http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 > <http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1> > > > ############################ > > To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: > mailto:[log in to unmask] > <mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]> > or click the following link: > http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 > <http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1> > > ############################ > > To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: > mailto:[log in to unmask] > <mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]> > or click the following link: > http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 > <http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1> > > ############################ > > To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: > mailto:[log in to unmask] > <mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]> or > click the following link: > http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 > <http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1> > > ############################ > > To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: > mailto:[log in to unmask] > <mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]> or > click the following link: > http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 > <http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1> > > ############################ > > To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: > mailto:[log in to unmask] > <mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]> or > click the following link: > http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 > <http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1> > -- *Lene Rachel Andersen* Futurist, economist, author & keynote speaker President of Nordic Bildung and co-founder of the European Bildung Network Full member of the Club of Rome *Nordic Bildung* Vermlandsgade 51, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark www.nordicbildung.org +45 28 96 42 40 ############################ To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1