Sorry--of course I meant "inclusion" not "conclusion" in the first line!
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Tamsin E Lorraine <[log in to unmask]
> wrote:
> I do think Tuvel's argument was "valid" for conclusion in Hypatia because
> it used careful reasoning in applying a parallel between two cases. This is
> a particular kind of approach that our discipline endorses. That such an
> approach can appear to me to be overly circumscribed and ahistorical --as
> well as dismissive of real life and power relations--doesn't mean that it
> doesn't produce interesting and even productive results in some cases.
>
> The way the problem was set up didn't seem to me to require a canvassing
> of research in the area since it was set up as a circumscribed approach
> designed to follow through a (perhaps overly intellectualized) problem in a
> narrow way. I would hope that the article would trigger other articles that
> would point out the limitations of such an approach and the way it failed
> in this instance.
>
> It's not a matter of saying "all viewpoints are equally valid"--it's a
> matter of pushing through the limitations of our own approaches by virtue
> of debate and critical reflection rather than policing. Tuvel's article was
> well-intentioned and well-done for what it was. To allow it to incite
> further debate on its drawbacks would, I think, be illuminating and helpful
> for moving philosophy as a discipline past some of its blockages in
> addressing crucial contemporary problems in an ethical way.
>
> Sincerely,
> Tamsin Lorraine
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 10:27 AM, <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Dipping back into a conversation because it seems like a relevant
>> qualifier is being excluded:
>>
>> Tasmin & Kathy
>>
>> I feel like in defense of Hypatia there continue to be some serious flaws
>> in addressing the issue. By framing free speech as a void there is a
>> continuing tendency to argue that "all viewpoints are equally valid," while
>> Hypatia is opening itself to such viewpoints should Hypatia, Feminist
>> Philosophy and Philosophy at large revisit other arguments lacking in
>> scholarly merit? Should we look forward to article arguing for the positive
>> contributions of eugenics? The necessity of fascism? And further *why* is
>> there a blithe dismissal that so many people that objected to the original
>> article objected because *it could not muster a veneer of relevant
>> research* which is entwined with issues of review process. Nowhere in the
>> original letter is there a call for Tuvel to lose her job nor is there a
>> call for her to face academic sanctions nor is there an explicit claim that
>> no research should ever be done on a subject. The claim is that the voices,
>> arguments and research of stakeholders in an argument are actually
>> important, something we could simply call "poor scholarship." It is
>> troubling that academic freedom only seems to come up when the academic has
>> managed to attack socially vulnerable groups (certainly Ward Churchill did
>> not get the same defense when he actually lost his position, which was
>> directly a freedom of speech case) and which continues to act as though
>> Tuvel is *entitled* to a job; if her two papers I have read (the Hypatia
>> article and one on "animality" about women of color which both show a
>> marked disinterest in the scholarship of women of color which talking about
>> women of color) are a benchmark for her research, she doesn't deserve the
>> position given her antagonistic viewpoint of historically vulnerable
>> populations as objects for her to utilize for thought experiments rather
>> than subjects of knowing. Maybe my assessment is harsh? But it is
>> immaterial.
>>
>> Kathy trying to parse your second to last paragraph, am I wrong in
>> thinking you are claiming that treating trans individuals as fully
>> functional human beings (and as having a legitimate gender) is an
>> ideological point which (again as I am parsing it) you believe is invalid
>> and dogmatically enforced? Because you could come out and say it? Since the
>> whole "pro trans = pro gender" reads as though you are arguing that there
>> is something wrong with the position?
>>
>> Best,
>> Fiona Maeve Geist
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On May 30, 2017, at 9:38 AM, Tamsin E Lorraine <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I was troubled by the original letter demanding retraction of Tuvel's
>> article both for its harshness toward a junior faculty member as well as
>> its harshness toward Hypatia reviewers.
>>
>> At the same time that I am sympathetic to those who were offended by
>> Tuvel's article, the kind of discomfort caused by feeling one's own
>> experience squelched seems to me endemic to debate--especially in our
>> relatively conservative discipline. Yes, this article marginalizes specific
>> forms of lived experience--never mind the work emerging from those lived
>> experiences--by virtue of turning it into a kind of intellectual puzzle
>> that carefully works through a circumscribed problem from one angle. But
>> even if this particular article might not have been my cup of tea, it
>> seemed to me that the article was in keeping with the standards of our
>> discipline. To exclude it from open debate where multiple viewpoints are
>> included seems to me to be counter-productive. What Hypatia needs to do, in
>> my opinion, is not exclude this kind of article, but make sure it includes
>> other voices, styles, and approaches as well. I worry about silencing
>> voices and I worry about policing voices that attempt to push our
>> discipline in positive directions even if that direction may not appear to
>> be "positive enough" according to our own sensibilities.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Tamsin Lorraine
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 8:15 AM, kathy miriam <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi John Flowers,
>>> you write, "Even if, as Dr. Tirrell notes above, this letter was meant
>>> to "scare and waste time and energy," and even if it is an elaborate hoax
>>> as Dr. Scheman suggests, some of us do not have the luxury of treating it
>>> as "exterior" to our future scholarship: I, as an example, have no choice
>>> but to treat this as a cautionary tale for what might happen to me *should
>>> I get scholarship wrong*, as a junior scholar."
>>> Are you referring to the original letter or the recent letter? I"m
>>> confused because while the women you refer to are talking about the recent
>>> letter it seems a complete reversal to call *that* letter a "cautionary
>>> tale" which hovers as a threat to juniors and minorities etc.rather than
>>> the first. Can you clarify? thanks.
>>>
>>> The remarks here insisting that the original letter signed by 800
>>> academics are a critique of the institution and not an attack on an
>>> individual even though almost the entire focus of the letter is on an
>>> individual scholar who is a junior seem disingenuous to say the least.
>>> Everybody here knows how vulnerable Juniors are to quirks in tenure
>>> committees let alone to such a full scale public excoriation. Indeed the
>>> first letter is a pointed threat to juniors and other vulnerable academics
>>> including grad students about not "getting scholarship wrong" --although
>>> the reality is not about scholarship but ideology--not getting the ideology
>>> wrong. In this case pro-trans and what many of us call pro-*gender*
>>> ideology.
>>>
>>> I'm really surprised that nobody is addressing the chief issue of the
>>> recent letter which is to cry out against censorship. Again it seems
>>> disingenuous to call for more critical thinking rather than less (as Naomi
>>> does) when the original letter is a project calling for *retracting* an
>>> article rather than taking the usual tack of rebuttal. Why so drastic?
>>>
>>> I have more points to raise but I'll leave it here.
>>>
>>> Sincerely
>>> Kathy Miriam
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:08 AM, Abigail Klassen <
>>> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi John and all,
>>>> As a recent PhD myself, I just found myself saying in my head, "Wow,
>>>> this man (John Flowers) has written what I wish I could have even begun to
>>>> articulate in the privacy of my own head, let alone in a mass email." At
>>>> least I managed to get that thought out "on paper" (i.e. as pixels on a
>>>> screen).
>>>> Thank you, John.
>>>> -Abigail
>>>>
>>>> Dr. a.r. (Abigail/Abi) Klassen - pronouns: ze/they/theirs
>>>> Faculty, Department of Philosophy and Honors College
>>>> University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Central Desert Complex 4, 424
>>>> Lab Affiliate, Laboratory for Perceptual and Cognitive Systems,
>>>> Faculty of Computing
>>>> University of Latvia
>>>> [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> or
>>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>> www.abigailklassen.com
>>>>
>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.abigailklassen.com_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HUp8-bkYMlNgd3ZJBxWBKsBsFAFGHrEZg21p9gxugJA&m=CThd0G_E86zibHo-0NXY0qisodZDPO2IQhA4eIvY8IQ&s=TB3LDbLqbSwoyrjEd8OEpKASGmVA7APRVf9VE2HH1To&e=>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 6:52 AM, John Flowers <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> As one of the junior scholars on the list, I've been following this
>>>>> conversation with interest, specifically with regards to how senior
>>>>> scholars in the field take up their obligation to mentor and cultivate
>>>>> junior scholars. In my mind, this also includes the *defense* of
>>>>> those scholars from retaliation within and outside of the field.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, something about the direction of this conversation has
>>>>> troubled me, and I think this troubled sensation can be summed up in a
>>>>> quotation from Sara Ahmed's text *Living A Feminist Life* which I
>>>>> think is apropos of the situation:
>>>>>
>>>>> *"When we have to think strategically, we also have to accept our
>>>>> complicity: we forgo any illusions of purity; we give up the safety of
>>>>> exteriority. If we are not exterior to the problem under investigation, we
>>>>> too are the problem under investigation." *
>>>>>
>>>>> We are all implicated in the situation that has given rise to the
>>>>> letter above (which, as a black junior scholar, is a frightening reality),
>>>>> as well as the need for conversations about the editorial practices of
>>>>> Hypatia, and the response of our field to Tuvel's article, and we must all
>>>>> look at how we *allowed* this to happen within our own community.
>>>>> That is, we must all examine the ways we bear some collective
>>>>> responsibility for the situation, and then do the hard work to change it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Again, as Ahmed says, we need to give up the "safety of exteriority"
>>>>> if we're going to make any actual headway at eliminating the conditions
>>>>> that allowed for this situation to arise in the first place. We need to ask
>>>>> how we, as a community of scholars, created the conditions for this entire
>>>>> situation to arise, and that requires us to accept some responsibility for
>>>>> it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Even if, as Dr. Tirrell notes above, this letter was meant to "scare
>>>>> and waste time and energy," and even if it is an elaborate hoax as Dr.
>>>>> Scheman suggests, some of us do not have the luxury of treating it as
>>>>> "exterior" to our future scholarship: I, as an example, have no choice but
>>>>> to treat this as a cautionary tale for what might happen to me *should
>>>>> I get scholarship wrong*, as a junior scholar.
>>>>>
>>>>> That being said, while I agree with Dr. Springer on the need for
>>>>> individual conversations, we must not forget that statements from
>>>>> institutions (and I would treat Hypatia and FEAST itself as institutions)
>>>>> generally carry the weight of the individuals who make up those
>>>>> institutions. While individual conversations are necessary, statements from
>>>>> institutions, *supported by action*, are also necessary.
>>>>>
>>>>> An institutional commitment to resolving a this situation in a way
>>>>> that promotes the elimination of the kinds of conditions that have given
>>>>> rise to this situation is something that can be used to hold not only the
>>>>> institution accountable, but those individuals who claim to be part of the
>>>>> institution as well. However, as I said above, a institution must be
>>>>> willing to support said statement with action (which is something I also
>>>>> claim of individuals) if the statement is to be effective.
>>>>>
>>>>> I do want to conclude by stating that I am heartened by the number of
>>>>> responses to the letter that pointed out its attempts to target vulnerable
>>>>> junior scholars: many of my colleagues have expressed concern about
>>>>> weighing in on the situation out of fear that they, too, might become
>>>>> targets before they've managed to establish themselves within the field.
>>>>>
>>>>> John Flowers
>>>>> Ph.D Candidate,
>>>>> Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Reiheld, Alison <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, the work involved in tracking down the provosts and admins is a
>>>>>> remarkable investment. And, so far as I can tell, an accurate one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That said, I look forward to a conversation with my Provost about how
>>>>>> my concerns over the Hypatia issues (as symptomatic of the profession, but
>>>>>> hoping for much better from our beloved flagship journal of feminist
>>>>>> philosophy) undermine the study of female materiality and women's issues in
>>>>>> the academy. I mean, speaking as the Director of Women's Studies, this
>>>>>> seems like a serious problem that the Provost and I should take up with
>>>>>> Prof. Reiheld.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alison
>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> Alison Reiheld
>>>>>> Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy
>>>>>> Director, Women's Studies Program
>>>>>> College of Arts and Sciences
>>>>>> Southern Illinois University-Edwardsville
>>>>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__siue.academia.edu_AlisonReiheld&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HUp8-bkYMlNgd3ZJBxWBKsBsFAFGHrEZg21p9gxugJA&m=RXTCFZBw4yua0m78uZm3twaiQMEtymipVBQWehkIOM8&s=tnJGxN3sK074cGHpEgpSQXu0VjcFjtOv1IaynrY-cdc&e=
>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__siue.academia.edu_AlisonReiheld&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HUp8-bkYMlNgd3ZJBxWBKsBsFAFGHrEZg21p9gxugJA&m=N7HjC8sTkL-P07ndX8XZxHvZsrhs0gucwhW-zudsYe0&s=dsSaeJmJxGJIBkg1kV2-QCY8fbtgS1CsT-XGCmm7-Lk&e=>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>> *From:* Feminist ethics and social theory <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> on behalf of Naomi Scheman <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> *Sent:* Sunday, May 28, 2017 10:34:19 PM
>>>>>> *To:* [log in to unmask]
>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: open letter
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The only signatories' names that looked at all familiar to me were
>>>>>> Ted Roosevelt and Adam Smith. But the letter specifically says they are not
>>>>>> all academics, let alone philosophers, so I don't know if it's a hoax or
>>>>>> rather a piece of nastily sophisticated trolling. And someone did a huge
>>>>>> amount of work tracking down the provosts at the universities of all the
>>>>>> signers of our open letter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Naomi Scheman
>>>>>> Professor Emerita, Philosophy and Gender, Women, & Sexuality Studies
>>>>>> University of Minnesota
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On May 28, 2017, at 10:40 PM, Lynne Tirrell <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am wondering if this is a hoax. Did others look at the signatures?
>>>>>> Do you know anyone? Only a few have institutional affiliations, and I don't
>>>>>> recognize a single name. I don't know everyone in philosophy, of course,
>>>>>> but NONE??
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is meant to scare and waste time and energy. I'm walking away.
>>>>>> But thank you to everyone who has posted useful analyses.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (Also, my last note was marked a possible fraud on my own iPad, I'm
>>>>>> not sure why.sorry if you got that too. )
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lynne Tirrell
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On May 28, 2017, at 10:23 PM, Rebecca Kukla <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Julianna - Are you sure you provost signed it? They set it up so that
>>>>>> the people they are sending it *to* look like the people who signed
>>>>>> it. I think your provost is on there because you signed the original letter
>>>>>> and they are trying to rat everyone out to their provosts, because they are
>>>>>> rancid pond scum.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rebecca
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 10:04 PM, Julinna Oxley <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks to Rebecca, Camisha, Serene, Ann, and others who I may have
>>>>>>> missed, for your thoughts. I am in complete agreement with the points you
>>>>>>> raise.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am writing with a “heads up” to anyone who signed the letter: take
>>>>>>> caution. My Provost has signed this letter, which means they did
>>>>>>> circulate the letter to upper administrators. I have a chair and a dean
>>>>>>> between me and the provost; the provost is the highest person that I would
>>>>>>> “directly report” to. I am not sure whether this letter was sent to my
>>>>>>> Dean. To be clear, I did not agree with everything in the original letter
>>>>>>> to Hypatia, but agreed with its spirit, and signed on in order to support
>>>>>>> the people whose work and lives I felt were erased in the Hypatia essay.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am shocked that:
>>>>>>> (a) this matter has been brought to the awareness of my EMPLOYER.
>>>>>>> The original letter which I signed was addressed to Hypatia, as it was an
>>>>>>> academic matter. It was not an employment matter. But now my participation
>>>>>>> in an academic debate has become a subject of my employment. Great.
>>>>>>> (b) the letter my employer received framing this debate is
>>>>>>> completely one-sided, and has the faults that others have identified.
>>>>>>> (c) the signatories of this counter-letter do not recognize the
>>>>>>> irony of their own actions with respect to harm, speech, etc.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am grateful that I am tenured and have a good working relationship
>>>>>>> with my Provost (at least I did up until now, I hope he did not receive an
>>>>>>> email saying, “Julinna Oxley is a witch-hunter, you should step in
>>>>>>> here”!!). My provost is a Business professor by training and I reported to
>>>>>>> him when I directed our Women’s and Gender Studies program. During that
>>>>>>> time he was very supportive and open to learning more about gender and
>>>>>>> feminism, gave us more lines to grow the program—and in fact, we just hired
>>>>>>> a full-time director to replace me. I personally am not worried about my
>>>>>>> employment (though I wonder now what his impressions of me and this whole
>>>>>>> debacle are), but I am pretty irate that they did this, because it could be
>>>>>>> really harmful for other people who may have signed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will not be writing or signing yet a third letter to circulate to
>>>>>>> the employers of the signatories of THIS LETTER – but the thought did cross
>>>>>>> my mind.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In solidarity,
>>>>>>> Julinna
>>>>>>> * —— Julinna C. Oxley, Ph.D. *Associate Professor of Philosophy
>>>>>>> Coastal Carolina University
>>>>>>> Edwards Humanities and Fine Arts #280
>>>>>>> 133 Chanticleer Drive West
>>>>>>> P.O. Box 261954
>>>>>>> Conway SC 29528
>>>>>>> (843) 349-6548
>>>>>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__joxley-40coastal.edu&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HUp8-bkYMlNgd3ZJBxWBKsBsFAFGHrEZg21p9gxugJA&m=KfVDTAp8SMAq3DDX3VV7hy7cACxXi36mA2G_T8_c5hU&s=KNx8KSc1VQ-eR0cUaTjwsx_MIlc8XoG7SLECCMo201Y&e=>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: Feminist ethics and social theory <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>> on behalf of Serene Khader <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>> Reply-To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>> Date: Sunday, May 28, 2017 at 8:52 PM
>>>>>>> To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: open letter
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Speaking as an individual (and not as a representative of Hypatia),
>>>>>>> I want to agree with the concerns raised Ann, Naomi, Rebecca, and Camisha.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I also want to draw attention to something that Rebecca already
>>>>>>> started to, but that may not be evident to many readers at first blush: the
>>>>>>> letter is TERFy. Point 3 is all about how "feelings about gender" are
>>>>>>> making it impossible to talk about sex. So, though the letter paints itself
>>>>>>> as a defense of academic freedom, I urge people to take note of what is
>>>>>>> being said in that section of the letter. As far as I can tell, the letter
>>>>>>> is trying to create outrage about the idea that trans people are silencing
>>>>>>> "females" and preventing feminist movements from advancing their interests.
>>>>>>> And I would hope that most people in the feminist philosophy community
>>>>>>> would find that proposition false and morally suspect--and that those of us
>>>>>>> who are cis would consider the interests and perspectives of our trans
>>>>>>> friends and colleagues as we formulate our individual reactions to the
>>>>>>> letter.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Lynne Tirrell <
>>>>>>> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I agree with Ann and think Naomi and Rebecca are right on. Thanks
>>>>>>>> especially, Naomi.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Lynne
>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad, by dictation
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On May 28, 2017, at 5:09 PM, Ann Garry <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> i'm coming to this only after seeing a number of responses. Let's
>>>>>>>> not give these people any more publicity. Ann
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Rebecca Kukla <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The more I am processing this the angrier I am getting. So they
>>>>>>>>> are sending this stupid letter to the provosts and deans of untenured
>>>>>>>>> people, trans and other minority scholars, and grad students who signed -
>>>>>>>>> presumably to get them in trouble? To fuck up their lives? To what end? How
>>>>>>>>> does this even conceivably help the causes that they themselves claim to
>>>>>>>>> champion? What the hell?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And they are using THIS LIST to try to get feminist scholars to
>>>>>>>>> throw vulnerable people under the bus at their own institutions, quite
>>>>>>>>> possibly without even noticing that that's what they are doing.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> With Naomi's clarification I am now about a thousand times more
>>>>>>>>> angry and disgusted than I was at the start.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rebecca
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Rebecca Kukla <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I didn't understand the list either! Weird! Thanks, Naomi.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I agree with several others on this thread that (even though I
>>>>>>>>>> started it) a back and forth over email is unlikely to be a wonderful idea,
>>>>>>>>>> and things will only get more and more meta. The more I read this letter
>>>>>>>>>> the worse it gets, It's TERFy and ignorant and doing even Tuvel herself no
>>>>>>>>>> favors. I'm pretty furious it exists.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'll just once more renew my call for people to actually work on
>>>>>>>>>> these issues and on communicating and listening better.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Rebecca
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Naomi Scheman <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Just a quick note lest anyone make the mistake I made: the list
>>>>>>>>>>> of names at the bottom of the open letter are the addressees, not the
>>>>>>>>>>> signers!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Naomi Scheman
>>>>>>>>>>> Professor Emerita, Philosophy and Gender, Women, & Sexuality
>>>>>>>>>>> Studies
>>>>>>>>>>> University of Minnesota
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On May 28, 2017, at 4:31 PM, NOELLE MCAFEE <
>>>>>>>>>>> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I agree 100 percent with Rebecca. Let's just stop tearing the
>>>>>>>>>>> feminist philosophy community apart. Enough with letters, petitions,
>>>>>>>>>>> defensiveness, and attacks. We need to think constructively about editorial
>>>>>>>>>>> practices going forward. Feminists ought to understand that if a group of
>>>>>>>>>>> colleagues are deeply offended by something then we all need to take notice
>>>>>>>>>>> and be honest and charitable and try to appreciate what is going on. This
>>>>>>>>>>> may call for a conference to sort it out.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On May 28, 2017, at 10:59 AM, Rebecca Kukla <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So people are angry about an open letter that they felt attacked
>>>>>>>>>>> a junior person so they thought the best solution was yet another open
>>>>>>>>>>> letter attacking what was mostly junior people? This has to stop somewhere.
>>>>>>>>>>> And this affair has to be allowed to die already.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't sign the first letter and I am not signing this one
>>>>>>>>>>> either.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> People need to stop trying to settle their academic and
>>>>>>>>>>> political disagreements via open letters designed to publicly shame by
>>>>>>>>>>> ganging up on other people. It's not even clear what action item this one
>>>>>>>>>>> is calling for. (The article is already being published, with only tiny
>>>>>>>>>>> word changes to bring it in line with current linguistic conventions that
>>>>>>>>>>> avoid slurs, and the other two items are too vague to be actionable.)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The issues in this area are super important, so let's actually
>>>>>>>>>>> work on them, rather than devoting our productive hours to
>>>>>>>>>>> metametametacritiques.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Rebecca
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Veltman, Andrea - veltmaal <
>>>>>>>>>>> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Vigo ([log in to unmask]) asked me to forward the
>>>>>>>>>>>> following message to the FEAST listserv.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best wishes,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrea
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ______________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dr. Andrea Veltman
>>>>>>>>>>>> Associate Professor of Philosophy
>>>>>>>>>>>> Department of Philosophy & Religion
>>>>>>>>>>>> James Madison University
>>>>>>>>>>>> MSC 8006
>>>>>>>>>>>> Harrisonburg, VA 22807
>>>>>>>>>>>> Office phone: 540-568-4236 <(540)%20568-4236>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> My latest book, *Meaningful Work*, is recently published by
>>>>>>>>>>>> Oxford University Press:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__global.oup.com_academic_product_meaningful-2Dwork-2D9780&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HUp8-bkYMlNgd3ZJBxWBKsBsFAFGHrEZg21p9gxugJA&m=RXTCFZBw4yua0m78uZm3twaiQMEtymipVBQWehkIOM8&s=PXs59KDrdoyicOULGj-Ts4g2EmQ5nn42tK6pr2U8b44&e=
>>>>>>>>>>>> 190618179?cc=us&lang=en&
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__global.oup.com_academic_product_meaningful-2Dwork-2D9780190618179-3Fcc-3Dus-26lang-3Den-26&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HUp8-bkYMlNgd3ZJBxWBKsBsFAFGHrEZg21p9gxugJA&m=LOV-2yxVfBhZ6rrELChk7V70HvBgW6zEshQ0UIKg7j4&s=HYce-eGOp33z007rPm2X5TNGaDb6rEQYz0bS3UosSqI&e=>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>> *From:* Julian Vigo <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Saturday, May 27, 2017 3:54 PM
>>>>>>>>>>>> *To:* Veltman, Andrea - veltmaal
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* open letter
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Andrea,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I am writing to ask if you could sign & share this open letter
>>>>>>>>>>>> to protect academic freedom related to the Tuvel affair with consequences
>>>>>>>>>>>> far beyond:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ipetitions.com_petition_an-2Dopen-2Dletter-2Don-2Dthe-2Dhy&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HUp8-bkYMlNgd3ZJBxWBKsBsFAFGHrEZg21p9gxugJA&m=RXTCFZBw4yua0m78uZm3twaiQMEtymipVBQWehkIOM8&s=52FWiqV__piyccT0lPiKZiPMgFLk0tz9_f621mqOvag&e=
>>>>>>>>>>>> patia-controversy
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ipetitions.com_petition_an-2Dopen-2Dletter-2Don-2Dthe-2Dhypatia-2Dcontroversy&d=DwMGaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=D9KtTmOQsn10dtN5dPMs0Q&m=5u-tJCbUBRI5uuQg2RcQWoYD8ONgKhBApUTxxS6d4u8&s=pD1LC8iUB_9BolWVjp5mQO6Efu7JLE3SBBQChsLBQFA&e=>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Your collaboration in signing and sharing this on social media,
>>>>>>>>>>>> with colleagues and the Listserv would be creating appreciated!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Warmly,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Vigo
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚
>>>>>>>>>>>> ˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚˚
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dr. Julian Vigo, PhD, FRSA
>>>>>>>>>>>> www.lubellule.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.lubellule.com_&d=DwMGaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=D9KtTmOQsn10dtN5dPMs0Q&m=5u-tJCbUBRI5uuQg2RcQWoYD8ONgKhBApUTxxS6d4u8&s=lb2KP3tV7dUGoMg0KrnwvFGHaQbKDzIfW2DnaflwlMc&e=>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__about.me_julianvigo&d=DwMGaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=D9KtTmOQsn10dtN5dPMs0Q&m=5u-tJCbUBRI5uuQg2RcQWoYD8ONgKhBApUTxxS6d4u8&s=CtuY6MLWsQNiq_B2LMDT2V8kGYMrgCu6Q9MsarFeLKg&e=>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <dragonfly.jpg>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__about.me_julianvigo&d=DwMGaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=D9KtTmOQsn10dtN5dPMs0Q&m=5u-tJCbUBRI5uuQg2RcQWoYD8ONgKhBApUTxxS6d4u8&s=CtuY6MLWsQNiq_B2LMDT2V8kGYMrgCu6Q9MsarFeLKg&e=>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__about.me_julianvigo&d=DwMGaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=D9KtTmOQsn10dtN5dPMs0Q&m=5u-tJCbUBRI5uuQg2RcQWoYD8ONgKhBApUTxxS6d4u8&s=CtuY6MLWsQNiq_B2LMDT2V8kGYMrgCu6Q9MsarFeLKg&e=>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__about.me_julianvigo&d=DwMGaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=D9KtTmOQsn10dtN5dPMs0Q&m=5u-tJCbUBRI5uuQg2RcQWoYD8ONgKhBApUTxxS6d4u8&s=CtuY6MLWsQNiq_B2LMDT2V8kGYMrgCu6Q9MsarFeLKg&e=>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__about.me_julianvigo&d=DwMGaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=D9KtTmOQsn10dtN5dPMs0Q&m=5u-tJCbUBRI5uuQg2RcQWoYD8ONgKhBApUTxxS6d4u8&s=CtuY6MLWsQNiq_B2LMDT2V8kGYMrgCu6Q9MsarFeLKg&e=>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__about.me_julianvigo&d=DwMGaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=D9KtTmOQsn10dtN5dPMs0Q&m=5u-tJCbUBRI5uuQg2RcQWoYD8ONgKhBApUTxxS6d4u8&s=CtuY6MLWsQNiq_B2LMDT2V8kGYMrgCu6Q9MsarFeLKg&e=>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__about.me_julianvigo&d=DwMGaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=D9KtTmOQsn10dtN5dPMs0Q&m=5u-tJCbUBRI5uuQg2RcQWoYD8ONgKhBApUTxxS6d4u8&s=CtuY6MLWsQNiq_B2LMDT2V8kGYMrgCu6Q9MsarFeLKg&e=>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__about.me_julianvigo&d=DwMGaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=D9KtTmOQsn10dtN5dPMs0Q&m=5u-tJCbUBRI5uuQg2RcQWoYD8ONgKhBApUTxxS6d4u8&s=CtuY6MLWsQNiq_B2LMDT2V8kGYMrgCu6Q9MsarFeLKg&e=>
>>>>>>>>>>>> linkedin
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__uk.linkedin.com_pub_julian-2Dvigo-2Dphd_18_b24_5a5&d=DwMGaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=D9KtTmOQsn10dtN5dPMs0Q&m=5u-tJCbUBRI5uuQg2RcQWoYD8ONgKhBApUTxxS6d4u8&s=Brg7Suwas2mQYJTX_opKLW3fHp-Z0fjtr4S546HlciE&e=>
>>>>>>>>>>>> aboutme
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__about.me_julianvigo&d=DwMGaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=D9KtTmOQsn10dtN5dPMs0Q&m=5u-tJCbUBRI5uuQg2RcQWoYD8ONgKhBApUTxxS6d4u8&s=CtuY6MLWsQNiq_B2LMDT2V8kGYMrgCu6Q9MsarFeLKg&e=>
>>>>>>>>>>>> twitter
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.twitter.com_lubelluledotcom&d=DwMGaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=D9KtTmOQsn10dtN5dPMs0Q&m=5u-tJCbUBRI5uuQg2RcQWoYD8ONgKhBApUTxxS6d4u8&s=1tZr6fcqe5sG1BFlSuI6Jnynvj_55RCbV3YTleKhSTA&e=>
>>>>>>>>>>>> google+
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__plus.google.com_u_0_114965595632445402873&d=DwMGaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=D9KtTmOQsn10dtN5dPMs0Q&m=5u-tJCbUBRI5uuQg2RcQWoYD8ONgKhBApUTxxS6d4u8&s=YCmrjJh7nOwd7aieUW7wEml27zyKNbRHRCKGBIHc71s&e=>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ############################
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the FEAST-L list: write to:
>>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
>>>>>>>>>>>> following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bi
>>>>>>>>>>>> n/wa?SUBED1=FEAST-L&A=1
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ############################
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the FEAST-L list: write to:
>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
>>>>>>>>>>> following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bi
>>>>>>>>>>> n/wa?SUBED1=FEAST-L&A=1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ############################
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the FEAST-L list: write to:
>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
>>>>>>>>>>> following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bi
>>>>>>>>>>> n/wa?SUBED1=FEAST-L&A=1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ############################
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the FEAST-L list: write to:
>>>>>>>>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
>>>>>>>>>>> following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bi
>>>>>>>>>>> n/wa?SUBED1=FEAST-L&A=1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ############################
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the FEAST-L list: write to:
>>>>>>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
>>>>>>>>> following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bi
>>>>>>>>> n/wa?SUBED1=FEAST-L&A=1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Ann Garry *
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> * https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.calstatela.edu_faculty_ann-2Dgarry&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HUp8-bkYMlNgd3ZJBxWBKsBsFAFGHrEZg21p9gxugJA&m=RXTCFZBw4yua0m78uZm3twaiQMEtymipVBQWehkIOM8&s=eGVIOgQHpfwbPlZ3uQMejN76RsQZoU9rczMQK8sFTk8&e=
>>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.calstatela.edu_faculty_ann-2Dgarry&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HUp8-bkYMlNgd3ZJBxWBKsBsFAFGHrEZg21p9gxugJA&m=Z0jpcXz_SIj8ix7TiUOVIxUrOTXkcsipb33sxSZ5VaQ&s=uUbq8Yj2IHHCPIVYYAG1KXxfS5mMzPKwVqp57Zlw6hA&e=>
>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ############################
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the FEAST-L list: write to:
>>>>>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
>>>>>>>> following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bi
>>>>>>>> n/wa?SUBED1=FEAST-L&A=1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ############################
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the FEAST-L list: write to:
>>>>>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
>>>>>>>> following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bi
>>>>>>>> n/wa?SUBED1=FEAST-L&A=1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Warmly,
>>>>>>> Serene
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Serene J. Khader, Ph.D
>>>>>>> Jay Newman Chair in Philosophy of Culture
>>>>>>> Associate Professor of Philosophy, Brooklyn College
>>>>>>> Associate Professor of Philosophy and Women's Studies, CUNY Graduate
>>>>>>> Center
>>>>>>> pronouns: she/her/hers
>>>>>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>>>>> www.serenekhader.com
>>>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.serenekhader.com&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HUp8-bkYMlNgd3ZJBxWBKsBsFAFGHrEZg21p9gxugJA&m=X1-eCb8FYbH3nixiy1tuTBbAD-CM8yZwxqHqu6CSduY&s=fQEHX9Aw51rksRBz69rWay_TBVU9ZHAa004BFuujARY&e=>
>>>>>>> Office: 3315 Boylan Hall
>>>>>>> ############################
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the FEAST-L list: write to:
>>>>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
>>>>>>> following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bi
>>>>>>> n/wa?SUBED1=FEAST-L&A=1
>>>>>>> ############################
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the FEAST-L list: write to:
>>>>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
>>>>>>> following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bi
>>>>>>> n/wa?SUBED1=FEAST-L&A=1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ############################
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the FEAST-L list: write to:
>>>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
>>>>>> following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=FEAST-L&A=1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ############################
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the FEAST-L list: write to:
>>>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
>>>>>> following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=FEAST-L&A=1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ############################
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the FEAST-L list: write to:
>>>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
>>>>>> following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=FEAST-L&A=1
>>>>>> ############################
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the FEAST-L list: write to:
>>>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
>>>>>> following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=FEAST-L&A=1
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ############################
>>>>>
>>>>> To unsubscribe from the FEAST-L list: write to:
>>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
>>>>> following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=FEAST-L&A=1
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ############################
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe from the FEAST-L list: write to:
>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following
>>>> link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=FEAST-L&A=1
>>>>
>>>
>>> ############################
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from the FEAST-L list: write to:
>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following
>>> link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=FEAST-L&A=1
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Tamsin Lorraine
>> Professor and Chair of Philosophy
>> Philosophy Department
>> Swarthmore College
>> [log in to unmask]
>> ############################
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the FEAST-L list: write to:
>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following
>> link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=FEAST-L&A=1
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Tamsin Lorraine
> Professor and Chair of Philosophy
> Philosophy Department
> Swarthmore College
> [log in to unmask]
>
--
Tamsin Lorraine
Professor and Chair of Philosophy
Philosophy Department
Swarthmore College
[log in to unmask]
############################
To unsubscribe from the FEAST-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=FEAST-L&A=1
|
