Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 5 Dec 2021 05:48:09 -0500 |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
this is a summary of my view of the :bohemian", but explained by Watt as
being the life of a "Forest dweller" in India.
Alan Watts | Being alone | - YouTube
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.youtube.com_watch-3Fv-3DqqUVXVBwGgA&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=DGY8NbX54MD-soKVRti_vGCfn79A914d68UYZ9vbfV8&s=_Ko5wRPBG0_KirjA7Aqm8wHDe1Cbn2CnN6wqsV0Enk8&e= >
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 6:31 PM Brandon Norgaard <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
> ------------------------------
>
> That’s awesome, thanks Lee!
>
>
>
> Some thoughts:
>
> - I can see how the vertical axis lines up with the Influence Matrix
> in a way similar to how Waldamar explained in a graphic shared with this
> list a few days ago, wherein he showed it was closely related to the upper
> vs. lower quadrants of Integral Theory. This individual vs. group dynamic
> keeps popping up in all kinds of places.
> - It is unclear what is the crux of the distinction between
> revolutionary and evolutionary approaches. We might start with the
> overarching assumption among probably all of these approaches that there is
> a very high likelihood of negative large-scale impacts in the
> not-to-distant future. That assumption is baked into the acknowledgement
> of the meta-crisis. I’m interpreting your revolution vs. evolution
> dichotomy as hinging upon whether people in that camp want active
> interventions in an effort to make serious course-corrections or whether
> they want incremental change through a series of mini-interventions that
> would be informed by feedback from the prior mini-interventions.
> Evolutionary approaches, I suppose, don’t have a grand strategy, or at
> least there is an assumption that there are natural forces driving this
> whole thing and the best we can do would be to make adjustments that might
> have a large-scale impact down the line, but not in a way we can foresee
> ahead of time. Is this accurate, partially accurate? Or perhaps am I
> really just misinterpreting?
> - Isn’t doomer defeatist more of an individual thing rather than
> institutional?
> - I find myself agreeing more so with the approaches closer to the
> center and less with those further out in one direction or another. As I
> see it, we need a more balanced approach.
>
>
>
> -Brandon
>
>
>
> *From:* theory of knowledge society discussion <
> [log in to unmask]> *On Behalf Of *lee simplyquality.org
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 1, 2021 5:32 AM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* ToK: Plotting our Future
>
>
>
> *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
> ------------------------------
>
> ToK Folk:
>
>
>
> I took a crack at plotting the concepts listed at
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wikiversity.org_wiki_Level-5F5-5FResearch-5FCenter_Escaping-5FDiscontent&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=DGY8NbX54MD-soKVRti_vGCfn79A914d68UYZ9vbfV8&s=aP-URsmvRmv8HCNBrqr9g-TGGSnHQGituACbgqGdBOU&e=
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wikiversity.org_wiki_Level-5F5-5FResearch-5FCenter_Escaping-5FDiscontent&d=DwMFAg&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=ZGlLUyQYhmS1e_AEhYTCtpeaEwId_wmwoICfGJUvzX8&s=lcZk2TUW_kidgjB9K5xi1sxohABiwWFuidO_-7sfdmA&e=> on
> a grid, shown below.
>
> I used the dimensions of individual <-> institutional shown vertically,
> and revolutions <-> evolution plotted horizontally.
>
> My placement of each concept is approximate at best.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Are the dimensions chosen the best for illuminating the differences in the
> approaches?
>
> Is each approach properly placed?
>
> Does this analysis and display provide any insights?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Lee Beaumont
>
>
>
>
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>
############################
To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
|
|
|