Dearest Gregg

As you know already, I'm totally with you.
However how do we get people out of the Cartesian paradigm, which would
essentially "treat" them one by one "as patients" to then reinstall them
into a society which they would then lack the capacity to understand and
even less so question? I know Sociology at least tried this in the late
19th and early 20th centuries during its golden age with figures like
Durkheim and Weber. But these days, with pale figures like Habermas at best
as idols, there is little or nothing left of Sociology. Certainly not any
understanding of Digital that would prepare people for the forthcoming and
global onslaught.
This is where our ideas of The Grand Narrative come into the picture. It is
going to take us and many more collaborators years to build. But I believe
it is needed if we are to ground our ambitions solidly and not have them
swept away into thin air. Dignity and integrity are still communicative
values. But what lies beneath is a material reality, from money to
technology, that can not be covered over with just communicative values.
This is where causality comes in. Or as I, in a Heideggerian manner prefer
to call it, proper "grounding". Our work ahead is certainly cut out for us.
We just need to do the work on different levels simultaneously.

Best intentions
Alexander

Den mån 25 mars 2019 kl 15:40 skrev Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx <
[log in to unmask]>:

> Alexander,
>
>   Lots of layers to this question and I have to get some things done
> today, so I will be relatively brief. First, the ToK and now larger “Age of
> Clarity” vision started for me when as I was being trained as a
> “psychological doctor.” I was seeking a scientific framework that could
> help me (a) describe and explain what was going on at the level of human
> psychology (the behavior of the individual, including their observable
> actions, their neurocognitive functions, their subjective experiences and
> their narratives for what they were doing and what was happening to them);
> (b) guided me to systematically recognize maladaptive patterns of being and
> (c) help them achieve greater flourishing and adaptive living; all while
> (d) being grounded in a clear and broad moral/ethical framework.
>
>
>
> The ToK and UTUA Theory of Knowledge is a synthetic philosophy that allows
> me to do just that. What is my ultimate goal? Well that is found in my
> “ultimate justification,” which is *Be that which enhances dignity and
> well-being with integrity* (found on my signature line). Here is a blog
> on those “big” three moral/ethical values
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.psychologytoday.com_us_blog_theory-2Dknowledge_201201_finding-2Dour-2Dmoral-2Dcompass&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=-NwFwY4TjlcdZNA8s5NMNKsFXzGo9Dev1y01gSgYU1M&s=mBuYvmkHS52mr4mGBBoz0fCkRxHwNu3WunOsNiDDmWY&e=>.
> I should note that they line up with Beauty (dignity), Goodness
> (well-being) and Truth (integrity) and are the antithesis of “Evil”
> (Ugly-Bad-Falseness/destructive warfare). In terms of my moral/ethical
> grounding, here is a blog that characterizes my moral vision as a
> “universalist” versus being an absolutist or a relativist
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.psychologytoday.com_us_blog_theory-2Dknowledge_201410_three-2Dviews-2Dmorality&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=-NwFwY4TjlcdZNA8s5NMNKsFXzGo9Dev1y01gSgYU1M&s=73c61kwdqjUyylvw-bLJLcB5uxdiIgcnyC4vBjgenPk&e=>.
> In short, the fundamental hope/offering is a system that enables
> understanding of ourselves in the natural world (it leaves mysticism and
> supernaturalism open and unaddressed, and seeks clarity about the empirical
> orders of nature, specifically Matter, Life, Mind and Culture). From that
> understanding and deeply connected to it, the hoped for emergence will be
> systems of wisdom that foster adaptive living
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.psychologytoday.com_us_blog_theory-2Dknowledge_201605_the-2Dadaptive-2Dliving-2Dequation&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=-NwFwY4TjlcdZNA8s5NMNKsFXzGo9Dev1y01gSgYU1M&s=iIAej08GO-JtpoA3BUg4VKSQXe95uQjeo13QZT8QyHs&e=>.
>
>
>
>
>   All of this now becomes much clearer for me, given my recent partnership
> with Edward Kroger and his formulation of the Patterns of Emotional Warfare
> and how to identify and reverse these destructive cycles and move into
> authentic flourishing. Doing exactly that was my original intent in
> becoming a psychological doctor: Identify how humans are suffering because
> of maladaptive psychosocial patterns and offer guidance that they freely
> choose (as opposed to being forced to follow) in their quest to develop
> healthy emotional function and more fulfilling relationships and ways of
> being in the world. That is the intent of the system, and its hoped for
> “overall destination.”
>
>
> Best of Intentions,
> Gregg
>
> ___________________________________________
>
> Gregg Henriques, Ph.D.
> Professor
> Department of Graduate Psychology
> 216 Johnston Hall
> MSC 7401
> James Madison University
> Harrisonburg, VA 22807
> (540) 568-7857 (phone)
> (540) 568-4747 (fax)
>
>
> *Be that which enhances dignity and well-being with integrity.*
>
> Check out my Theory of Knowledge blog at Psychology Today at:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.psychologytoday.com_blog_theory-2Dknowledge&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=-NwFwY4TjlcdZNA8s5NMNKsFXzGo9Dev1y01gSgYU1M&s=47l4pMypOpQt4Ag8THF8xQFEKgKQyaSCE8eIcn0CpK4&e=
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* [log in to unmask] <
> [log in to unmask]> *On Behalf Of *Alexander Bard
> *Sent:* Monday, March 25, 2019 9:52 AM
> *To:* Intellectual Deep Web <[log in to unmask]>
> *Cc:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* Re: ToK vs Modern Psychology (and connection to Empire)
>
>
>
> Dear Gregg & Co
>
>
>
> The crisis in psychology is the same as the crisis in all the social
> sciences. Why do they exist in the first place? What is their overall goal?
>
> The social sciences were developed in the 19th century to serve the
> European nation-states and their spin-offs around the world.
>
> Once nationalism was over and done with, the social sciences had become
> establishments that were looking for new raisons d'etre to keep their
> immense academic machines thriving.
>
> So they moved from states to markets and began targeting confused
> individual consumers and drowned them in fixes and treatments.
>
> The goal of permanent meaning was replaced with the ambition of temporary
> happiness. No wonder we have arrived in a society with 100% diagnoses and
> pills for just about everything. While the underlying existential crisis is
> exploding, still being met with nothing but further flattering language and
> treatment fashions. Meaning the social sciences have - at best - become
> part and parcel of the same industry as gyms and sun tanks.
>
> Fair enough. But we want more than that. Especially as "digital" will
> require realness on a level that psychology has escaped since it became the
> more pretentious part of new age mythology and a sub-division of Madison
> Avenue.
>
> So what is the Tree of Knowledge's overall destination? And which power
> structures does it serve, how, and why?
>
> Or are we only discussing a shared language here? To do what, prepare
> psychology for machine intelligence?
>
>
>
> Best intentions
>
> Alexander
>
>
>
>
>
> Den lör 23 mars 2019 kl 15:36 skrev Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx <
> [log in to unmask]>:
>
> (TOKer’s I am cross posting this from Alexander’s list—he asked me to
> explain how the ToK approaches psychology in contrast to the modern
> approach)
>
>
>
> Great question about psychology and the ToK formulation, Alexander. Let me
> focus here on the first part of your query, spelling out the ToK System
> (which BTW, is embedded in a larger UTUA Framework) vision relative to
> mainstream academic (American) psychology.
>
>
>
> Modern academic psychology, at least as it is taught here in psych 101
> courses, is defined by its commitment to empiricism (i.e., it emphasizes
> systematic data gathering and testing hypotheses). At the conceptual level,
> it consists of a bunch of overlapping but also competing and inconsistent
> paradigms. Some of the major ones are: social cognitive functionalism
> (e.g., Albert Bandura, Beck), radical behaviorism (Skinner), psychodynamic
> (neo-Freudian), humanistic, evolutionary, and cultural (or social
> structural…feminist, postmodern), along with many other minor ones. From a
> ToK perspective the multiplicity of fragmented paradigms fail to produce
> consensual knowledge (in contrast to Periodic Table of the Elements, for
> example). And thus modern psychologists are largely going through the
> motions of the scientific method, but they are not generating consensual
> scientific knowledge in the same way as physicists, chemists and biologists
> do.
>
>
>
> The ToK starts with the one thing that psychologists have consensus about,
> which is that there is no consensus about how to define the field.
> Theoretical psychologists call this “the crisis” and has been readily
> recognized since the turn of the 20th Century. I have labeled the crisis
> “the problem of psychology”. It refers to the fact that unlike physics and
> biology (defined respectively as the sciences of Energy/Matter and Life)
> there is NO shared general subject matter that unifies the field. That is,
> it is sometimes defined as the science of the mind, sometimes
> consciousness, sometimes behavior, sometimes it corresponds to only people,
> sometimes it corresponds to animals. It can’t even agree on whether it is
> primarily a basic science discipline (like biology), or if it is more of an
> applied health service discipline (like medicine or social work).
>
>
>
> Why is there no agreed upon subject matter? The reason for this was
> well-diagnosed by the philosopher Larry Cahoone in his 2014 Orders Of
> Nature. In it he builds a systematic metaphysics almost identical to my ToK
> System vision that includes Matter, Life, Mind and Culture as separable
> orders of nature. He argues strongly that such a view is needed in contrast
> to the either/or Matter/Physicalism versus Mind/Idealism versus Dualism
> that has been the operating as the fundamental metaphysical “choice” for
> modern, Western intellectual thought.  He writes:
>
>
>
> *“[The picture of naturalism adopted here] rejects the dominant bipolar
> disorder of modern philosophy, the belief that reality is constituted by at
> most two kinds of entities or properties, the physical and the mental, a
> disorder shared by idealism, dualism, and physicalism or materialism,
> reductive or nonreductive. That disorder encouraged us to think physics is
> the only metaphysically interesting natural science, that human mentality
> is the only part of nature that creates problems for a (physically
> oriented) metaphysics, that knowledge and mind are solely human
> possessions, that all the other natural sciences—chemistry, the Earth
> sciences, biology, engineering—are metaphysically unimportant. This dualism
> has been repeatedly and recursively applied, multiplying sub-schools (for
> example, between “scientific” naturalists and “humanistic” naturalists),
> but always with the same tendencies. It arguably has something to do with
> the congealing of twentieth-century Western philosophy into two opposed
> hermetic traditions, analytic and continental philosophy, one (in its
> metaphysics) tending to focus on highly specialized problems in the
> interpretation of physics and the possible reduction of mentality, the
> other rejecting natural science as inhospitable to whatever matters to the
> human prospect (there being some exceptions on both sides who, as is said,
> prove the rule). In a broader context, both are manifestations of the
> conflict of C. P. Snow’s the “two cultures” (Snow and Collini, 1993). In
> contrast the current naturalism bases itself in multiple sciences, not just
> physics. It accepts emergence, the presence of irreducible properties at
> levels of complexity, or what is the same thing, the reality and causal
> relevance of hierarchically arranged complex systems and processes. The
> idea is not new. It is a re-fashioning of a genre of post-Darwinian
> naturalistic metaphysics active from 1870– 1930, and epitomized by the
> British Emergentists of the 1920s. Such thinkers—who pre-dated the division
> of philosophy into analytic and continental schools—accepted the
> metaphysical relevance of multiple sciences and saw nature as complex and
> evolving. Largely cast aside by philosophy, their conceptions remained
> alive in the work of some revisionist theologians and interdisciplinary
> scientists concerned with emergence and hierarchical systems theory,
> recently resurrected by scientific work on complex systems.”*
>
>
>
> The ToK System is a picture of Cahoone’s emergent naturalism. Both systems
> show very clearly that there is a “Mental Order” of nature that resides
> between the Life/biological and Culture/Social dimensions. Why is this
> crucial? Because it provides a clear systematic metaphysical grounding for
> understanding what exactly is meant by “the mental,” which becomes the
> foundational way of characterizing psychology’s subject matter. That is,
> (basic) psychology is/should be the science that is concerned with the
> mental order of nature. For example, I have explicitly articulated why this
> understanding allows us to go from the current split between cognitivism
> versus behaviorism to a coherent “mental behaviorism” (can share papers if
> interested).
>
>
>
> So, that is one answer…the ToK resolves the metaphysical problem of modern
> scientific psychology. I will say it actually does more than this, as the
> full UTUA language system I built also comes with Justification Systems
> Theory, Behavioral Investment Theory, and the Influence Matrix (and a whole
> system for psychotherapy). These allow for the “metatheoretical”
> integration of all the paradigms to create theoretical harmony, anchored to
> a shared language system. My book, *A New Unified Theory of Psychology*,
> explains how this works.
>
>
>
> Let me stop there and see if this makes sense. The next part of the answer
> gets into morality and digital and the future. I will also say here that I
> agree with Mark that modern psychology was disconnected from the moral in a
> deep and problematic way that it needs to contend with and offer a vision
> about. I can also articulate why I am so enthralled with your “Empire”
> vision and why I think there are such strong parallels with how I see
> things. I will simply summarize the linkages as follows: I believe that the
> Enlightenment did a great job of helping us understand the physical,
> chemical, and biological aspects of nature. However, it breaks down at the
> level of psychology, for the reasons noted. I think I built a system that
> can solve the problem of psychology, and that can then be linked to the
> social sciences on the one hand and morality/ethical living on the other. I
> think the world is horribly confused about these domains and chaos is
> reigning. I think both of us are interested in fostering greater
> understanding of the connections between the natural sciences, the social
> sciences, and the arts/humanities/theologies and how to build a post
> postmodern grand meta-narrative that brings clarity to these issues, and
> affords us a way to transition into the digital age in with greater wisdom
> than is currently being exhibited by our leaders and institutions.
>
>
> Best,
>
> Gregg
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* [log in to unmask] <
> [log in to unmask]> *On Behalf Of *Alexander Bard
> *Sent:* Saturday, March 23, 2019 7:15 AM
> *To:* Intellectual Deep Web <[log in to unmask]>
> *Subject:* Re: BIT and Four Inner Senses
>
>
>
> Dear Gregg
>
>
>
> Brilliant!!!
>
> In what way does the Tree of Knowledge differ from wherever contemporary
> psychology has arrived?
>
> Let's say I'm asking for a friend. But also to connect your work with
> possible empire or subsidiarity models explored here elsewhere.
>
> Is the ToK focused on "the (in)dividual"? Or is the ToK focused on how to
> make sense of the social in the digital?
>
> What ethical imperative would for example the ToK give the machines in
> order to serve the humans?
>
>
>
> Best intentions
>
> Alexander
>
>
>
> Den tors 21 mars 2019 kl 12:44 skrev Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx <
> [log in to unmask]>:
>
> Hi IDWers,
>
>
>
>   I meant to share that the post that Mark offered on medieval psychology
> and the *Four Inner Senses* was very helpful to me (thanks for that,
> Mark). Since Alexander asked about the inner senses in his post today, I
> thought I would share where I am coming from.
>
>
>
> Here is the key 2x2 from that chapter:
>
>
>
> Object known is either:      *Present*                  *Retained*
> What is sensed                *common sense *       *imagination*
> Beyond what is sensed     *estimative power*      *memory*
>
>
>
> In my UTUA/ToK Framework, I developed Behavior Investment Theory (BIT) to
> account for animal behavior/mind…and what Larry Cahoone calls the “mental
> order” in nature. BIT assimilates and integrates many ideas. For example,
> it bridges the conceptual divide between modern cognitive neuroscience and
> radical behaviorism, via “mental behaviorism” (Skinner’s Fundamental
> Insight and Fundamental Error
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.psychologytoday.com_blog_theory-2Dknowledge_201609_skinners-2Dfundamental-2Dinsight-2Dand-2Dfundamental-2Derror&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=wjF8cZoiFchamTuxBdDEmw&m=8iiTFSEiuwnPcjC853aHfCL1ktn_bXtLyQ7M2E0eHwE&s=7nwesgy2PDIZ8hUcj1UMteXvQ6hUy360QvviKJzPxak&e=>).
> It also generates a cognitive functionalist view of the human mind/mental
> architecture. (The Four Levels of Pain
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__my.psychologytoday.com_blog_theory-2Dknowledge_201210_the-2Dfour-2Dlevels-2Dpain&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=wjF8cZoiFchamTuxBdDEmw&m=8iiTFSEiuwnPcjC853aHfCL1ktn_bXtLyQ7M2E0eHwE&s=AzZ6-RUShf_4W6MTAEsK11_2eSCAcwMXixNGKLyz27M&e=>).
> I wanted to note here that I think the BIT Architecture of the Human Mind
> lines up well with the medieval psychology categories. Attached is a map as
> to how I see the lineup.
>
>
>
> Happy to field any questions if they arise.
>
>
> Best,
> G
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Intellectual Deep Web" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [log in to unmask]
> To post to this group, send email to
> [log in to unmask]
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_msgid_intellectual-2Ddeep-2Dweb_c395d1a3814c4f76817b056b9943f4f9-2540jmu.edu&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=-NwFwY4TjlcdZNA8s5NMNKsFXzGo9Dev1y01gSgYU1M&s=bexLTWBSnRSx7kkX0HphSgCoKU8lCO85FYW5vLk22_g&e=
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_msgid_intellectual-2Ddeep-2Dweb_c395d1a3814c4f76817b056b9943f4f9-2540jmu.edu-3Futm-5Fmedium-3Demail-26utm-5Fsource-3Dfooter&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=wjF8cZoiFchamTuxBdDEmw&m=8iiTFSEiuwnPcjC853aHfCL1ktn_bXtLyQ7M2E0eHwE&s=Sshj8yaiCFoRItzF74IeaWx46yQ9spG4rhKJlVw1_cg&e=>
> .
> For more options, visit https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_optout&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=-NwFwY4TjlcdZNA8s5NMNKsFXzGo9Dev1y01gSgYU1M&s=_486AWHKY9sPvYv2U6lB33cgmy0YQ7KggJcj9g58ARI&e=
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_optout&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=wjF8cZoiFchamTuxBdDEmw&m=8iiTFSEiuwnPcjC853aHfCL1ktn_bXtLyQ7M2E0eHwE&s=25hcGNDzpEsUOe7KqHUPkRkBBCiFsiJwcMFk3ovgKJo&e=>
> .
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Intellectual Deep Web" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [log in to unmask]
> To post to this group, send email to
> [log in to unmask]
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_msgid_intellectual-2Ddeep-2Dweb_CAPgYmjUvoEs72MUEbMAoHOXWJGVK8O9CQ-5F27SODxo2QXvXzz7w-2540mail.gmail.com&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=-NwFwY4TjlcdZNA8s5NMNKsFXzGo9Dev1y01gSgYU1M&s=dZpKBiK128UOSuSjObmSNkc9OqYLUoDF-vL2ft_VvVc&e=
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_msgid_intellectual-2Ddeep-2Dweb_CAPgYmjUvoEs72MUEbMAoHOXWJGVK8O9CQ-5F27SODxo2QXvXzz7w-2540mail.gmail.com-3Futm-5Fmedium-3Demail-26utm-5Fsource-3Dfooter&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=wjF8cZoiFchamTuxBdDEmw&m=8iiTFSEiuwnPcjC853aHfCL1ktn_bXtLyQ7M2E0eHwE&s=dqbNRWeZuV6vEDjMWyo5AHlZe8FQ2VInbEJJGjMP3eA&e=>
> .
> For more options, visit https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_optout&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=-NwFwY4TjlcdZNA8s5NMNKsFXzGo9Dev1y01gSgYU1M&s=_486AWHKY9sPvYv2U6lB33cgmy0YQ7KggJcj9g58ARI&e=
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_optout&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=wjF8cZoiFchamTuxBdDEmw&m=8iiTFSEiuwnPcjC853aHfCL1ktn_bXtLyQ7M2E0eHwE&s=25hcGNDzpEsUOe7KqHUPkRkBBCiFsiJwcMFk3ovgKJo&e=>
> .
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Intellectual Deep Web" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [log in to unmask]
> To post to this group, send email to
> [log in to unmask]
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_msgid_intellectual-2Ddeep-2Dweb_79989dee63924534b5da6108e873a973-2540jmu.edu&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=-NwFwY4TjlcdZNA8s5NMNKsFXzGo9Dev1y01gSgYU1M&s=k46B1CKkDV5UTtedkzY42FERk8L80-AhC5h-IbiQQ1Q&e=
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_msgid_intellectual-2Ddeep-2Dweb_79989dee63924534b5da6108e873a973-2540jmu.edu-3Futm-5Fmedium-3Demail-26utm-5Fsource-3Dfooter&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=wjF8cZoiFchamTuxBdDEmw&m=7F9PNv1TckVPmRUE_O5MPPn5S328XuWHcoIyEFG8Ec8&s=rm9JT5lv4rCdlFOjzlO7MlXsIx6CQg0NvNIGy9zLhi0&e=>
> .
> For more options, visit https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_optout&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=-NwFwY4TjlcdZNA8s5NMNKsFXzGo9Dev1y01gSgYU1M&s=_486AWHKY9sPvYv2U6lB33cgmy0YQ7KggJcj9g58ARI&e=
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_optout&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=wjF8cZoiFchamTuxBdDEmw&m=7F9PNv1TckVPmRUE_O5MPPn5S328XuWHcoIyEFG8Ec8&s=EWRzjDXCjlzIyWQ98v6VNfGevipgcZQ84UEdFuRSgtI&e=>
> .
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Intellectual Deep Web" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [log in to unmask]
> To post to this group, send email to
> [log in to unmask]
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_msgid_intellectual-2Ddeep-2Dweb_CAPgYmjXb9o9-253DTFyk-252BL8qWFOKNotE2D89MhXFDj9Ywo-5FW4FRFuw-2540mail.gmail.com&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=-NwFwY4TjlcdZNA8s5NMNKsFXzGo9Dev1y01gSgYU1M&s=CTPh8BKrvXS8G2oBO_mG5s7DfD5aIvEMbT97GqRuVmI&e=
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_msgid_intellectual-2Ddeep-2Dweb_CAPgYmjXb9o9-253DTFyk-252BL8qWFOKNotE2D89MhXFDj9Ywo-5FW4FRFuw-2540mail.gmail.com-3Futm-5Fmedium-3Demail-26utm-5Fsource-3Dfooter&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=wjF8cZoiFchamTuxBdDEmw&m=7F9PNv1TckVPmRUE_O5MPPn5S328XuWHcoIyEFG8Ec8&s=UJ6YYo4WowgQLegXXxwnxSimrxvw3uQiwtgizCEptvU&e=>
> .
> For more options, visit https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_optout&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=-NwFwY4TjlcdZNA8s5NMNKsFXzGo9Dev1y01gSgYU1M&s=_486AWHKY9sPvYv2U6lB33cgmy0YQ7KggJcj9g58ARI&e=
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_optout&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=wjF8cZoiFchamTuxBdDEmw&m=7F9PNv1TckVPmRUE_O5MPPn5S328XuWHcoIyEFG8Ec8&s=EWRzjDXCjlzIyWQ98v6VNfGevipgcZQ84UEdFuRSgtI&e=>
> .
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Intellectual Deep Web" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [log in to unmask]
> To post to this group, send email to
> [log in to unmask]
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_msgid_intellectual-2Ddeep-2Dweb_c846a54c00734980ab920368bd3d681a-2540jmu.edu&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=-NwFwY4TjlcdZNA8s5NMNKsFXzGo9Dev1y01gSgYU1M&s=MhOi9WqFMv_6rZBgC1ng1rZwLqcKWCWUg9FKaI5_Ods&e=
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_msgid_intellectual-2Ddeep-2Dweb_c846a54c00734980ab920368bd3d681a-2540jmu.edu-3Futm-5Fmedium-3Demail-26utm-5Fsource-3Dfooter&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=-NwFwY4TjlcdZNA8s5NMNKsFXzGo9Dev1y01gSgYU1M&s=-25A2R2m3UwhszI_Hk4hLBcgaEJa-9FiTsCPL6wKCpc&e=>
> .
> For more options, visit https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_optout&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=-NwFwY4TjlcdZNA8s5NMNKsFXzGo9Dev1y01gSgYU1M&s=_486AWHKY9sPvYv2U6lB33cgmy0YQ7KggJcj9g58ARI&e=.
>

############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1