https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__youtu.be_ASB07-2Dv-5FADM&d=DwIDaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=kgqPZWOkI08klwZjvai-5bZDufsvgpfoVnO2-B0VgZE&s=lMqihi55LH67aiMWE46r6mwcBCXPNPCvlsFqxcl2wxU&e=
Check Marina Abramovich's Performance Art. Very psychological work.
TY
Deepak Loomba
On 9/26/2020 12:21 AM, James Lyons-Weiler wrote:
> Thank you. I'm writing a treatise on this inspired by our discussions
> that is a little mind-blowing.
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 2:48 PM Bradley H. Werrell, D.O.
> <[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
> Wonderful post by Jack.
>
> I particularly liked this element;
>
> We are shaved apes with self-referential G x E cognitive
> plasticities with emergences such as self awareness, culture,
> traditions, external memory devices (books etc) which also provide
> further E influences, and we are currently using the cognitive
> plasticities to try to understand them.
>
>
> I would hasten to edit only a little bit this quote, such that
> what Jack is calling "emergences" to be "emergencies," for it
> appears that such development is always associated with some
> crisis of being as manifest in our human condition.
>
> We are in one now.
>
>
> Bradley
>
>
>
>
> Bradley H. Werrell, D.O. - This email is private and copyrighted
> by the author.
>
> On Friday, September 25, 2020, 08:40:57 AM MST, James Lyons-Weiler
> <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
> wrote:
>
>
> Greg,
>
> I agree w/you.
>
> My interjection of course is not meant to replace or explain
> everything, evolutionary causes are not sufficient at all, but
> they are a necessary (but insufficient) starting place.
>
> I know you agree that ToK would be incomplete without evolutionary
> starting points.
>
> Our ancestral legacies, such as hormones, absolutely /influence/
> us and what can be studied at the higher levels.
>
> Most evolutionary biologists would not, I think, presume to think
> seriously that we are merely shaved apes.
>
> We're so much more than that.
>
> We are shaved apes with self-referential G x E cognitive
> plasticities with emergences such as self awareness, culture,
> traditions, external memory devices (books etc) which also provide
> further E influences, and we are currently using the cognitive
> plasticities to try to understand them.
>
> Our collective minds then become a landscape upon which a
> collective intelligence about the world (including ourselves); it
> is an evolving
> collective intelligence, fluid, subject to mutation and
> selection. BIT and JUST are very useful and more general places
> within which this truth resides and bridge to societal tendencies
> and emergences.
>
> Another way to say this is that we really need to consider
> Cognitive Plastic Phenotype (CPP) = G x E^2
>
> At the same time, to me, ToK by definition is a beautiful and
> comprehensive /example/ of those activities (unless you've had
> external influences you're not telling us about) :) Philosophers
> of logic can have fun trying to reconcile how specific examples
> such as ToK can or cannot be explained by themselves; your
> invocation of non-theistic metaphysics gives hypothetical
> framework which also represents an example of the competing ideas
> residing in the collective intelligence, but to me it's not an
> escape. I don't see ToK as tautological though- because as any
> model approaches sufficiency and completeness, it often becomes
> indistinguishable from reality.
>
> Convergence of quantum mechanics reconciled with general
> relativity will also seem obvious (unless GR needs to be replaced
> with an update).
>
> Thus, well done!
>
> I imagine that a self-help book "Embrace The Shaved Ape Within
> You" would be fun.
>
> Jack
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:09 AM Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx
> <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
> Thanks for this reply. This opens up a whole host of issues
> that I have long wrestled with, so I will not dive into the
> details.
>
> The short reply I will offer is that (a) evolutionary does
> provide an absolutely necessary lens to understand human
> behavior and (b) it is not straightforward to go from an
> evolutionary biological analysis to understanding human mental
> behavior.
>
> The reason why can be framed by the ToK System. You can’t just
> go from the second joint point (even a sophisticated evo devo
> synthesis) to human behavior without going through BIT first,
> then JUST. Even then you aren’t done, because you have grapple
> with fact-value issues. Steve Quackenbush will be talking
> about how the problem of value haunts psychology in a future
> TOK Community meeting.
>
> So, short answer is, yes, I agree it is crucial to have the
> lens, and it is also the case that it needs to be qualified by
> considerations that I generally find evolutionary biologists
> to be blind to. For example, Bret Weinstein, god love him, way
> over shoots in his analysis of the extend to which you can
> apply straight forward evolutionary biological thinking to
> things like religion. Once you get the JUST frame right, then
> you can see why analyses like his are, well, profoundly
> incomplete.
>
> For a few essays on evolutionary psychology, see here:
>
> First, on why, from a UTOK perspective, evo psych comes up short:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.psychologytoday.com_us_blog_theory-2Dknowledge_201310_ep-2Dis-2Dnot-2Dviable-2Dintegrative-2Dmeta-2Dtheory&d=DwIDaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=kgqPZWOkI08klwZjvai-5bZDufsvgpfoVnO2-B0VgZE&s=ypot7bQsvr177YrKgi8h991za-2ET_X-hP0s3RsaJnk&e=
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.psychologytoday.com_us_blog_theory-2Dknowledge_201310_ep-2Dis-2Dnot-2Dviable-2Dintegrative-2Dmeta-2Dtheory&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=EAKsDwUYpPwFHnnc_fuGs08K9YDw9VM53f6-h7dwxb0&s=IsYUJOHIQE0sKFSNLW47nVdX6qgWbAj7Jsn9N5zK9yg&e=>
>
> a critique of my critique:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.psychologytoday.com_us_blog_pop-2Dpsych_201310_evolutionary-2Dpsychology-2Dtying-2Dpsychology-2Dtogether&d=DwIDaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=kgqPZWOkI08klwZjvai-5bZDufsvgpfoVnO2-B0VgZE&s=jwLuntvm3dUtoyFb3Y17M9iQ2h6FYCchdlQ7gg2LYac&e=
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.psychologytoday.com_us_blog_pop-2Dpsych_201310_evolutionary-2Dpsychology-2Dtying-2Dpsychology-2Dtogether&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=EAKsDwUYpPwFHnnc_fuGs08K9YDw9VM53f6-h7dwxb0&s=2hvuEvwlQklq0796MXr7iDHdzzOnG93vF14kCyWkCBk&e=>
>
> and my critique of that:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.psychologytoday.com_us_blog_theory-2Dknowledge_201310_rhetoric-2Ddebate-2Dand-2Ddialogue-2Dabout-2Dep&d=DwIDaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=kgqPZWOkI08klwZjvai-5bZDufsvgpfoVnO2-B0VgZE&s=hOFxnIj8Jh6sCk6YeDTcKRES_MCDMf7q1QktvN51YcY&e=
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.psychologytoday.com_us_blog_theory-2Dknowledge_201310_rhetoric-2Ddebate-2Dand-2Ddialogue-2Dabout-2Dep&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=EAKsDwUYpPwFHnnc_fuGs08K9YDw9VM53f6-h7dwxb0&s=joTLV5q7Oaxr22sNQRsP_kiSy9sJgKxpPCdKROK_3UU&e=>
>
> Best,
> Gregg
>
> *From:* tree of knowledge system discussion
> <[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>*On Behalf Of *James
> Lyons-Weiler
> *Sent:* Friday, September 25, 2020 8:32 AM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> *Subject:* Re: Reevaluating Beliefs
>
> Quick evolutionary interjection Gregg-
>
> To me, it is utterly ironic that the brain that creates and
> conducts reason, science and logic seek hopelessly to apply
> the same
>
> set of mental frameworks to understand its own irrationality.
> Achieving that goal is, at best, only sometimes possible.
>
> One way to make sense is to surmise that perhaps in many
> irrationalities there underlies a rationality that transcends
> our minds.
>
> An evolutionary explanation of love, for example, by most seen
> as irrational, is pair-bonding that leads to survival of
> offspring. Birds dancing in unison serves the same purpose
> and has no other rational explanation.
>
> So in couples' counseling, sometimes aggression/control can be
> seen as having, ultimately, a rational impetus as part of a
>
> genetic repertoire of behavioral options for spousal
> manipulation/control to reinforce the contract of the pair
> bond. It is of course also
>
> rational to understand that alternative means may be more
> effective.
>
> I'm not sufficiently schooled in the history of evolutionary
> psychology to stand firm here on this, and the testability
> criticism weakness (appropriately) in my view the "instant
> validation" of the evolutionary explanation, however, a
> systematic analysis of dysfunctional behavior that
>
> begins with the analysis of the couple as part of the larger
> sociological set to which they belong, and to the species to
> which they belong,
>
> tells us that as a bonded, married couple, they are best
> understood as being a couple that belongs to a species whose
> members not merely sometimes partake in serial monogamy,
> promiscuity, parental investment; that the two genders are
> expected to have different investment strategies, with
> distinctly different evolutionary stable strategies being
> expected in the gender, indeed the same person at different
> times in life,
>
> depending on many cues.
>
> It is not to belittle the human mind or the species to
> acknowledge the evolutionary legacy that gives us these
> complex organs a starting point.
>
> There is, then the reality that we recently have come through
> an amazing but shallow history shifting us from
> hunter/gatherer tribes in small
>
> populations to increasingly larger populations with a
> decreasing role of small group dynamics; potential mates are
> no longer rarer, and in our cognitive hyperplasticity
> phenotype we see that we are adaptable to new norms and laws
> so we can learn that wife-beating, for example, is wrong;
> society may provide alternative cues that tell men (or abusive
> women) that it's not unusual, and police responses can
> misguide men (or women) into a pattern by misaligning the cues
> to which they respond, triggering further abuse or
> dysfunction. These environmental inputs matter more than
> defining situational context; they provide the E in the G x E
> interaction of human cognitive phenotypic hyperplasticity
> without resorting to reductionism.
>
> The phenotype of cognitive flexibility has a rational ultimate
> basis in evolution; those who fail to adapt to societal norms
> being taken out of the gene pool via imprisonment, death,
> shunning... we can begin to grasp a comprehension of the
> otherwise incomprehensible without for a moment saying that we
> are subject to any particular fate by our genes.
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 7:51 AM Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx
> <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
> Hi Lee,
>
> My analysis of the BEVI is complicated. Moreover, I no
> longer work much with Craig Shealy, and I know it as
> evolved some, but I can’t really comment much on where it
> is or respond to these questions with any authority.
>
> But I do have some thoughts about these issues. From
> where I sit (i.e., my scientific, humanistic
> metapsychology theory of knowledge) I sometimes find that
> you attempt to apply a model of scientific realism to all
> domains of human belief, but that feels to me inadequate.
> Indeed, much of human activity, engagement, fighting about
> what is real, take place in domains that are not amenable
> to being analyzed via a scientific realist
> onto-epistemology. The reason is because the
> onto-epistemological belief-value subjective networks are
> all tied up with the issue at hand.
>
> Here is blog that gets at what I mean that enters the
> world of couple’s therapy
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.psychologytoday.com_us_blog_theory-2Dknowledge_201504_your-2Dversion-2Dreality-2Dand-2Dmine&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=lhaBGK2LX7aK2UmOFg-A_U3Oe-9d-sgiYPcjVv8P1nI&s=MBmX823KaeKpPx6fL78IBov0_rUZFhVCpLyk6dcYYtM&e=>.
> Note, it incorporates Shealy’s Version of Reality concept
> that was discussed in that paper.
>
> I agree that a scientific realist onto-epistemology can
> provide a frame for the couple. But I don’t think it is
> adequate for much of the work. Take the husband’s claim:
> “You are a liar”. Is that a fact that corresponds to
> reality? I don’t think there is a simple answer here
> (e.g., a case could easily be made that the wife
> exaggerated and misrepresented and sometimes “lied”, but
> does that justify the trait-based claim? What is the
> reality here? It is not like the shape of the Earth). This
> is why I think you need more of a humanistic,
> values-based, relational developmental social construction
> of reality frame to deal with issues like this. The
> reality of the relationship is constructed by their
> actions and justifications. Thus, the observer of an
> independent reality that is the supposition of a
> scientific realism does not work very well in everyday,
> idiographic, interpersonal engagements. I am guessing that
> this is why the professional/practicing psychologists
> found your very interesting take to be insufficient to
> deal with the subjective and value-based intersubjective
> domains that are so apparent in the therapy room.
>
> Love to get your take on this.
>
>
> Best,
> Gregg
>
> *From:* tree of knowledge system discussion
> <[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>*On Behalf Of
> *Leland Beaumont
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2020 11:50 AM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> *Subject:* Re: Reevaluating Beliefs
>
> Thanks Rob,
>
> I enjoyed watching your google talks video (twice!) I am
> looking forward to your forum presentation.
>
> At 39:50 in the video you use the phrase “useful truth”
> and then go on to say that “truth is weird”.
>
> In my “seeking real good” talk I stated that “truth
> corresponds to reality”. I also mentioned that reality is
> vast, complex, and dynamic.
>
> When we get a chance, I would like to discuss the
> distinctions between “useful truth” and “correspondence to
> reality” especially in considering the question of “Where
> was Barack Obama born?”
>
> Gregg, thanks for the EI, BEVI paper; it is very helpful.
>
> I notice the paper lacks explicit reference to reality as
> a primary and unifying frame of reference for acquiring,
> assessing, and accepting or rejecting beliefs. On page 95
> it is claimed the counselor has an “…ethical obligation to
> adopt client's values and beliefs.” I argue there is an
> obligation (perhaps even more compelling) to assess and
> influence those beliefs toward true beliefs, consistent
> with our best understanding of reality. Also the 10
> process scales from the BEVI lack an item for "cognitive
> contact with reality" – reflecting the relevance of
> empirical evidence in forming beliefs. (e.g. I believe the
> earth is nearly spherical because in fact (based on the
> correspondence to reality, learning that expert
> exploration of the earth provides representative evidence
> that the earth is nearly spherical) the earth/is /nearly
> spherical.) (P99) It also does not (explicitly) address
> "personal epistemology" –what is the process you use to
> choose your beliefs.
>
> Eric, thanks for identifying the importance of
> Post-Traumatic growth.
>
> Lee Beaumont
>
> *From:* tree of knowledge system discussion
> <[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>*On Behalf Of
> *easalien
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 22, 2020 6:16 PM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> *Subject:* Reevaluating Beliefs
>
> Hey Leland, Having been on both sides of the equation, I
> can say change is often a response to trauma, real or
> perceived. It’s a form of adaptive behavior driven by
> adverse circumstances. Very rarely do comfortable people
> change.
>
> Most of you I’m sure have heard of PTSD. The other side of
> that is Post-Traumatic Growth. This article sums it up nicely:
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__blogs.scientificamerican.com_beautiful-2Dminds_post-2Dtraumatic-2Dgrowth-2Dfinding-2Dmeaning-2Dand-2Dcreativity-2Din-2Dadversity_&d=DwIDaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=kgqPZWOkI08klwZjvai-5bZDufsvgpfoVnO2-B0VgZE&s=E7XZsrDsPx-ZGSV0cHzJ7u7B2c0vM4DKyB-b-HKmGoo&e=
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__blogs.scientificamerican.com_beautiful-2Dminds_post-2Dtraumatic-2Dgrowth-2Dfinding-2Dmeaning-2Dand-2Dcreativity-2Din-2Dadversity_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=FE9YjbAkxcapLo-BOfWURIZDgaGBWZfogomrcPeIbAA&s=4tUV_boJFf2CL2mhoj_hZSXigbj4OUass2CL2U93atY&e=>
>
> With the clusterf*ck that is 2020, cherished beliefs are
> challenged and people are retreating into entrenched
> ideologies or opening up to the truth, which must be
> experienced a posteriori. Otherwise, it’s like a scholar
> “explaining” war to a veteran. It rings hollow.
>
> Personally, abandoning unverified belief in exchange for
> verifiable truth has brought a remarkable sense of
> balance. It’s taught me empathy and gratitude as well as
> peace with uncertainty. With the world as it is, maybe we
> need to take our philosophy and let it go.
>
> Eric S.
>
>
> On Thursday, September 17, 2020, Leland Beaumont
> <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
> ToK Forum Members,
>
> Intrigued by questions that were raised when I
> presented Seeking Real Good to this forum, I am
> researching the topic of “Reexamining Beliefs”. I have
> recently read several books that pertain to forming
> beliefs and defending long-held beliefs. What I am
> still curious to understand is the triggers and
> introspective processes that result in people changing
> deeply held beliefs. For example, why do some people
> reflect on their religious beliefs and become
> non-theists? Why do people switch political parties,
> what triggers the shift from “love you forever” to
> “divorce you now”, why did some people shift from
> never Trump to Trump forever while Michael Cohen
> turned against him? Why do some people leave cults and
> others double down? What attracts people toward
> conspiracy theories and then what changes that causes
> people to abandon those theories?
>
> I would like to be able to describe a process each of
> us would be motivated to use to reexamine our beliefs
> and progress toward true beliefs.
>
> I will appreciate it if you can recommend reliable
> references on this topic.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Lee Beaumont
>
>
>
> ############################
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
>
> write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>
> or click the following link:
>
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> or click the following
> link:http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> or click the following
> link:http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> or click the following
> link:http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>
>
>
> --
>
> ---
> james lyons-weiler, phd
>
> Author, CEO, President, Scientist
>
> Editor-in-Chief, Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.publichealthpolicyjournal.com_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=lhaBGK2LX7aK2UmOFg-A_U3Oe-9d-sgiYPcjVv8P1nI&s=nHhodjDhtmtNGRGTfUja_JESJn1cJTR7toW8xLp3NKc&e=>
>
> Guest Contributor, Children's Health Defense
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__childrenshealthdefense.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=lhaBGK2LX7aK2UmOFg-A_U3Oe-9d-sgiYPcjVv8P1nI&s=PRu-a5wDr2iXic9zuqOzzlz6wBxnMcLkumaz4Z7L5VA&e=>
>
> The Environmental and Genetic Causes of Autism
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1KNSxPp&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=lhaBGK2LX7aK2UmOFg-A_U3Oe-9d-sgiYPcjVv8P1nI&s=fkWiuSIci7kBRcvjpA88YIhqcsd_BssV-AvpxG6Dy9k&e=>
> (Skyhorse Publishing)
>
> Cures vs. Profits: Successes in Translational Research
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.amazon.com_gp_product_9814730149_ref-3Das-5Fli-5Fqf-5Fsp-5Fasin-5Fil-5Ftl-3Fie-3DUTF8-26camp-3D1789-26creative-3D9325-26creativeASIN-3D9814730149-26linkCode-3Das2-26tag-3Dlivgrelivwel-2D20&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=lhaBGK2LX7aK2UmOFg-A_U3Oe-9d-sgiYPcjVv8P1nI&s=FlDBIYP4ysnE6C5B6fFXR32RoMdH6KrmeaDLWYj4Uok&e=> (World
> Scientific, 2016)
>
> Ebola: An Evolving Story
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1TGYY9r&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=lhaBGK2LX7aK2UmOFg-A_U3Oe-9d-sgiYPcjVv8P1nI&s=77J4lhTu7CsgDk_qKxCklrFy3o0cut8DKig1YKw98rc&e=>
> (World Scientific, 2015)
>
> cell 412-728-8743
> email [log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> www.*linkedin*.com/in/*jameslyonsweiler*
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_jameslyonsweiler&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=lhaBGK2LX7aK2UmOFg-A_U3Oe-9d-sgiYPcjVv8P1nI&s=lGV2aRt7fPwRrNCG-kc63o9zY14tk_pz9m6Crl8ymbg&e=>
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> or click the following
> link:http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]>or
> click the following
> link:http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>
>
>
> --
> ---
> james lyons-weiler, phd
> Author, CEO, President, Scientist
> Editor-in-Chief, Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.publichealthpolicyjournal.com_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=EAKsDwUYpPwFHnnc_fuGs08K9YDw9VM53f6-h7dwxb0&s=83_oSYU27XqLnf9yqzfAsLaNcZ_zuP-LA70_P2r3QRg&e=>
> Guest Contributor, Children's Health Defense
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__childrenshealthdefense.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=EAKsDwUYpPwFHnnc_fuGs08K9YDw9VM53f6-h7dwxb0&s=91JY9bY6FN6tPlwoeQfvVBxi_aLKQt6XhWYXSVjIJQU&e=>
>
> The Environmental and Genetic Causes of Autism
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1KNSxPp&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=EAKsDwUYpPwFHnnc_fuGs08K9YDw9VM53f6-h7dwxb0&s=nPS92YqV9GsOCZms6pONmGvkpbnUM4zX7opAXbtN-hk&e=>
> (Skyhorse Publishing)
> Cures vs. Profits: Successes in Translational Research
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.amazon.com_gp_product_9814730149_ref-3Das-5Fli-5Fqf-5Fsp-5Fasin-5Fil-5Ftl-3Fie-3DUTF8-26camp-3D1789-26creative-3D9325-26creativeASIN-3D9814730149-26linkCode-3Das2-26tag-3Dlivgrelivwel-2D20&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=EAKsDwUYpPwFHnnc_fuGs08K9YDw9VM53f6-h7dwxb0&s=0tbW9v-IK64MGijZ5dxmvHqQco5krJAkB3pr41V6yoU&e=> (World
> Scientific, 2016)
> Ebola: An Evolving Story
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1TGYY9r&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=EAKsDwUYpPwFHnnc_fuGs08K9YDw9VM53f6-h7dwxb0&s=coQ7Sb_eM2n6951CHuF71k1mGAR06yZWtsSed5_5eHg&e=>
> (World Scientific, 2015)
> cell 412-728-8743
> email [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> www.*linkedin*.com/in/*jameslyonsweiler*
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_jameslyonsweiler&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=EAKsDwUYpPwFHnnc_fuGs08K9YDw9VM53f6-h7dwxb0&s=JZWAEHzD-x1QObt6KO3zSaCMN4V0Cfb1cjX6hdd-PoM&e=>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]>or
> click the following
> link:http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]> or
> click the following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>
>
>
> --
> ---
> james lyons-weiler, phd
> Author, CEO, President, Scientist
> Editor-in-Chief, Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.publichealthpolicyjournal.com_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=eSz18KulCYitVgOyiZr64lLGIlkXEBykoveJT4zPlJ0&s=LMab95YMd02BTADLoD95raoq8669l1Wuv4xeWRAhv4s&e=>
> Guest Contributor, Children's Health Defense
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__childrenshealthdefense.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=eSz18KulCYitVgOyiZr64lLGIlkXEBykoveJT4zPlJ0&s=7JNgFGyG3jJ6CfkcMBI5szghQ5Fzg9xvXj4QCoXBNz4&e=>
>
> The Environmental and Genetic Causes of Autism
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1KNSxPp&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=eSz18KulCYitVgOyiZr64lLGIlkXEBykoveJT4zPlJ0&s=bry_QVBv49D1OoWNFMfUHCKYqeEcuwBma9e5GGl9CiE&e=>
> (Skyhorse Publishing)
> Cures vs. Profits: Successes in Translational Research
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.amazon.com_gp_product_9814730149_ref-3Das-5Fli-5Fqf-5Fsp-5Fasin-5Fil-5Ftl-3Fie-3DUTF8-26camp-3D1789-26creative-3D9325-26creativeASIN-3D9814730149-26linkCode-3Das2-26tag-3Dlivgrelivwel-2D20&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=eSz18KulCYitVgOyiZr64lLGIlkXEBykoveJT4zPlJ0&s=aeST6O7rAMxM8mT3o5Po7eT2sFof6fgxzZ-LGi8VqO0&e=> (World
> Scientific, 2016)
> Ebola: An Evolving Story
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__amzn.to_1TGYY9r&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=eSz18KulCYitVgOyiZr64lLGIlkXEBykoveJT4zPlJ0&s=OK_3NYJPpX4m6Haw8eu6cRk8OJFYd_xDGy4lXwqicWw&e=>
> (World Scientific, 2015)
> cell 412-728-8743
> email [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> www.*linkedin*.com/in/*jameslyonsweiler*
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_jameslyonsweiler&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=eSz18KulCYitVgOyiZr64lLGIlkXEBykoveJT4zPlJ0&s=6EbYjMdORVRwAGaHIXHuBoWn1Ei5QO5wqsUU7WG5GJ4&e=>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]> or
> click the following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>
--
############################
To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
|
