TOK-SOCIETY-L Archives

August 2020

TOK-SOCIETY-L@LISTSERV.JMU.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
multipart/related; boundary="0000000000006e6ddd05adb6b758"
Date:
Tue, 25 Aug 2020 11:05:45 -0600
Reply-To:
tree of knowledge system discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Brent Allsop <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Sender:
tree of knowledge system discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 kB) , text/html (5 kB) , image001.png (48 kB) , image003.jpg (37 kB)
Hi Gregg,

On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 7:07 AM Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi Brent,
>
>
>
>   I think there is some confusion about Mind3. I would not say, exactly,
> that it “includes” Mind1 and Mind2. Rather, it depends on them. The point
> of the table, here:
>
>
>
> Is that the contents of Mind3 are available across the interior and
> exterior perspectives. That is, I am sharing with you directly my
> propositionally grounded, linguistically mediated self-conscious
> justification narrative for the domain of Mind3. To the extent you are a
> fluid speaker of English and have access to the vocabulary, you can fully
> observe this process (to the extent that I make it public).
>

Oh OK.  Yes.  Now I understand.



>
>
> I think I have a frame on the other aspects of what you write. For
> example, here is Jana Uher’s representation that includes the “dual aspect”
> element that I think you are getting at (i.e., that is why there are two
> depictions of the environment—one is the perceived situation and the other
> is the ontic reality, that exists independent of the perception of the
> situation that the individual is constructing in their psyche):
>
>
>
>
Yes, that is a great frame, nicely distinguishing knowledge of reality from
reality.  It is much like this simplified one by Steven Lehar:





> I am not sure that email is the best way to get at this, as we need to be
> so very careful and clear with our language, and our understanding of
> epistemology and the ontological referents we have in mind. Perhaps a
> discussion at some point would be more fruitful.
>
> <http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1>
>
Agreed.  Takes multiple iterations before I finally get it.
We're working on a video, with 3D animations, which we're hoping will help
with this.
Here is an early rough draft video of the "differentiating reality and
knowledge of reality" chapter (6 minutes, 52 seconds).
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__drive.google.com_file_d_1N6IL5-5FM46wCVy5r4iAVA0X-2DLWVcdN9ss_view&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=TexD_5jXnMEo4AVrFE4jhp_ZSZ6c3k_00dFa0sxKbAA&s=51TiOR-UaQLZE0BHbf5SLZo8HGZOFg3IUOKbmzARSWY&e= 

############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1


ATOM RSS1 RSS2