TOK-SOCIETY-L Archives

May 2022

TOK-SOCIETY-L@LISTSERV.JMU.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Metamodern Magick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
theory of knowledge society discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 7 May 2022 03:16:48 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (4 kB) , text/html (10 kB)
I poke my head in this thread sparingly, and I was not disappointed in any
way upon popping into this one.

I remain curious about how a BPS (I’m assuming this stands for
“biopsychosocial”) framework would clarify the relationship between gender
identity and biological sex. It’s fun that that term (BPS) popped up in
this thread, given that a phrase that popped into my mind this morning is,
“a woman is a biopsychosocial phenomenon.” To me, this term is inclusive
without being blindly wokist.

I’m especially interested in this given recent archaeological findings that
I have read about, with more and more women being found buried with weapons
of both war and the hunt.

It has me curious if certain roles in society are innately feminine or
masculine, or if they are neutral in themselves but can be approached in a
distinctly feminine or masculine way. For example, how stay-at-home-dad is
to housewife.

That’s all I’ll say for now. Mostly just appreciating the ability to
recognise the complexity of these topics and how they’re related.

Also: can confirm UTOK-induced alopecia is a real thing as I make painfully
slow progress reading your book, Gregg.

Wish me luck in falling asleep, TOKers!

sw

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 1:05 PM Waldemar Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
> ------------------------------
> Rachel: well, maybe not a monastery.  All genders/persuasions are
> welcome.  Acolytes, maybe? (in the general sense of acolyte)
>
>
> On May 5, 2022, at 4:18 PM, Rachel Hayden <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
> ------------------------------
> If people are going virtually bald, is this a virtual monastery? 🤓
>
> Okay okay... seriously, if I hadn't stumbled on Gregg's work I'd probably
> blithely accept the definitions posted in previous emails as well. Now when
> I hear people change "mind-body" to "brain-body" using the same definition
> for each, I get extra wrinkles.
>
> R
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 1:52 PM Waldemar Schmidt <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
>> *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click links
>> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
>> safe.
>> ------------------------------
>> Sorry.
>>
>> I’ve done that before - and still don’t know how I accomplish it.
>> Perhaps, I have a hidden fault of being a politician.
>>
>> The message is a response to Gregg’s comment to Rachel about to tearing
>> out one’s hair as one becomes a ToK devotee:
>>
>>
>>    - I am now virtually bald.
>>
>>
>> On May 5, 2022, at 11:17 AM, michael kazanjian <[log in to unmask]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click links
>> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
>> safe.
>> ------------------------------
>> I received a blank. No message.
>>
>> On Thursday, May 5, 2022, 12:52:59 PM CDT, Waldemar Schmidt <
>> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click links or
>> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
>> safe.
>> ________________________________
>>
>> > On May 5, 2022, at 10:28 AM, Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx <
>> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ############################
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
>> write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
>> or click the following link:
>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>> ############################
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
>> following link:
>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>>
>>
>> ############################
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
>> following link:
>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>

############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1


ATOM RSS1 RSS2