Hello ToK Society, Good read. I read this and wonder how much the Big Five relies on "statistical significance". The "physics envy" ubiquitous in psychology is getting a bit embarrassing at this point. Have a good one, Jason Bessey On Tuesday, August 17, 2021, 09:02:06 AM EDT, Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx <[log in to unmask]> wrote: Nice critique of one of my field’s misguided methodological endeavors https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.sciencenews.org_article_statistical-2Dsignificance-2Dp-2Dvalue-2Dnull-2Dhypothesis-2Dorigins&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=tSEhM-ccnT7TdUJW0u4emYhYJf92pgeQKUm--wJEdak&s=WgxwR27s9Fsc09tfv5SE3Rz2_Pqwur_cG78pN-OCXLE&e= Sent from my iPad ############################ To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1 ############################ To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to: mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
