TOK-SOCIETY-L Archives

May 2018

TOK-SOCIETY-L@LISTSERV.JMU.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
tree of knowledge system discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 27 May 2018 14:27:53 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (4 kB) , text/html (14 kB)
Hi TOK Society,

  I have a question for you. It has to do with how much one should insist on being cited. On the one hand, one does not want to be a whiner, and many, many people have the experience that their ideas don't get the citations or attention that they deserve. I certainly have felt that and have tried to CALM MO it and be careful as to not to be egotistical.

  At the same time, it is not appropriate, I don't think, to be completely ignored and that is what I feel has occurred. So here is the story:

  In 2013, I saw an article in a prominent journal, Brain and Behavior Sciences that offered a new theory on the evolution of reasoning that framed it in terms of argumentation and persuasion. Namely, the authors argued that we humans were evolved reasoners so that we could persuade others in arguments. As soon as I saw the article, I contacted the first author, Hugo Mercier, and shared with him my frame. We had a few exchanges (see below).

  Well, I just picked up a 2017 book, The Enigma of Reason<https://www.amazon.com/Enigma-Reason-Hugo-Mercier-ebook/dp/B06XWFM3PP/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1527430219&sr=8-1&keywords=the+enigma+of+reason>, that offers an "original, new" theory on why and how humans reason. The central thesis is an evolutionary psychology framework where "reason has two main functions, that of producing reasons for justifying oneself and that of producing arguments to convince others. These two functions rely on the same kind of reasons and are closely related." (p. 8). The focus is on how reason giving is crucial in social arrangements and for social influence. I am cited nowhere in the book.

  I am curious as to what the authors' justification is for not citing my work. It is one thing to not be aware; I can grant that. But to be contacted by me and to be given the justification framework which has been in print since 2003 and to move one's theory from a focus on argumentation to a more central focus on justification and not cite existing work just seems to violate basic rules of academic knowledge production.

Would welcome thoughts.

Best,
Gregg




From: Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 8:44 AM
To: Hugo Mercier <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: RE: Argumentative Theory and Justification Hypothesis


Thanks, Hugo. Look forward to it.

G



______________________________________________________________________
Gregg Henriques, Ph.D.
Professor
Director, C-I Doc Program
Department of Graduate Psychology
216 Johnston Hall
MSC 7401
James Madison University
Harrisonburg, VA 22807
(540) 568-7857 (phone)
(540) 568-4747 (fax)

Be that which enhances dignity and well-being with integrity.


Check out my Theory of Knowledge blog at Psychology Today at:
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/theory-knowledge

________________________________
From: Hugo Mercier [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 11:26 PM
To: Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx
Subject: Re: Argumentative Theory and Justification Hypothesis
Hi Gregg,

 Thanks a lot for sending this, I'll give the papers a look as soon as possible and get back to you!

Cheers,
Hugo

On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:

Hi Hugo,



  A while back I read your B&BS article on a human theory of reasoning, and I have been meaning to write since then because I had a similar idea that might be of interest to you. It is called the "Justification Hypothesis" and posits that human reasoning evolved because language created the adaptive problem of "reason giving" (aka justifying, which of course overlaps much with arguing). I employ an evolutionary argument and use the lens to understand modern research similar to the work you have done.



 Attached are two articles. I particularly recommend scanning the chapter on the JH to get a feel for where our ideas might intersect. I would be happy to discuss this further if you are interested.

Best,

Gregg

______________________________________________________________________
Gregg Henriques, Ph.D.
Professor
Director, C-I Doc Program
Department of Graduate Psychology
216 Johnston Hall
MSC 7401
James Madison University
Harrisonburg, VA 22807
(540) 568-7857 (phone)
(540) 568-4747 (fax)

Be that which enhances dignity and well-being with integrity.


Check out my Theory of Knowledge blog at Psychology Today at:
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/theory-knowledge




--
Hugo Mercier
CNRS Researcher
L2C2 -- Lyon
http://sites.google.com/site/hugomercier/

############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1


ATOM RSS1 RSS2