Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 6 Sep 2021 09:38:08 +1200 |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I have thought about it from the point of view of the speed limit. I
live in New Zealand. We have an open road limit of 100 km/hr that
results in around 300 death per year. If we reduced the limit to 80Km or
whatever, we know we would reduce the road death, but actually we have
determined that 300 deaths a year is acceptable for the convenience of
getting from place to place.
Another angle is that as numbers grow in a group, requisite variety
increases because there are more people with more skills, that creates
more and more opportunities for growth so we co-operate, form bigger
groups for the greater pay off, But, greater requisite variety also
means greater difference between the parts that means greater conflict.
Groups grow to the point of acceptable conflict - and the risk of
falling into deep conflict or violence, a point I call the edge of
conflict. Any creature not will to embrace an acceptable level of
conflict will be out competed by other creatures that will and lose fitness.
On 6/09/2021 9:16 am, Alexis Kenny wrote:
> *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click
> links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
> content is safe.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All,
>
> A few months ago I came across a narrative that described an
> "invention" that increased deaths and injuries within the population
> to a significant degree and yet made things easier / more pleasant for
> nearly everyone. The story ended with a sort of moral dilemma question
> - asking the reader if they would accept the advantages of the
> invention even though it would mean also accepting the injuries/deaths
> it caused. The reader then answers yes or no and then the invention
> was named...it ends up being the automobile.
>
> Long story to a short question...does anyone have the actual narrative
> of this moral dilemma? I cannot, for the life of me, find it online. I
> think it would be a useful tool within certain group therapy contexts
> and would love to be able to locate it.
>
> Many thanks!
>
> Warmly,
>
> Ali
>
> --
> *Alexis (Ali) Kenny*, PsyD, LP
> Staff Psychologist
> /LeaderWise
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.leaderwise.org_ali-2Dkenny&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=-LxYOQhF6RJOYCnJqruUgwlEUs8YzucqrwoHW3acRg8&s=pvr8sOwHhxf-tZRiVVWxPj8TnVuKfjfM4yif8-PBoZc&e=>/
> email: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> phone:406.540.3411
> site: alexisckenny.wix.com/marriedinmission
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__alexisckenny.wix.com_marriedinmission&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=-LxYOQhF6RJOYCnJqruUgwlEUs8YzucqrwoHW3acRg8&s=jVL1okpkCDUZQwkjUBvXl85m2iIjZf3wZauCrTH3bts&e=>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]> or
> click the following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
> <http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1>
>
--
Victor MacGill PhD
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.victormacgill.com&d=DwIDaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=EJi7L8KhhCymAlo3nBnJzIFQzDAN9WLCQW-3JY40EAg&s=r9UYdIAxzAjBzEcQX2-dI8zoaAVe9J9Uo6HWY8mGZqI&e=
Author of When the Dragon Stirs: Healing our Wounded lives through Fairy Stories, Myths and Legends
and Gonna Lay Down my Sword and Shield: A complexity perspective on human evolution from a Violent Past to a Compassionate Future
############################
To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
|
|
|