TOK-SOCIETY-L Archives

April 2018

TOK-SOCIETY-L@LISTSERV.JMU.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
JOHN TORDAY <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
tree of knowledge system discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 22 Apr 2018 11:19:59 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2762 bytes) , text/html (4 kB)
Gregg, with all sincerity and due respect, here's how metaphysics is
defined in Wikipedia: the branch of philosophy that deals with the first
principles of things, including abstract concepts such as being, knowing,
substance, cause, identity, time, and space. Both the science 'in the box'
and 'out of the box' are based on hypothesis testing scientific evidence.
OK, my prediction that the origin of life is in the Singularity is not
evidence based, but is based on the method I used to get back to the
self-referential self-organizational basis of the unicell, working
backwards from phenotypes to mechanisms developmentally and
phylogenetically, which I assume gives me 'license' to speculate as to the
pre-adaptation that gave rise to the first cell. Unfortunately the physics
and math are not available yet to test that hypothesis, though someone I
know who is a physicist/biologist suggested to me that perhaps the
ambiguity I have described is the biologic manifestation of the
Singularity. At any rate, unless that idea is put out there, like
Einstein's theories about planets bending gravity or the Higgs particle,
will never be tested. I continue to admire your desire to get us all into
the tent, so let's see how far down the road we can kick this can......

On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 10:06 AM, Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> John,
>
>   I appreciate that you want to get as far away from “metaphysics” as you
> can. I just want you to be clear that we mean different things by the term.
>
>
>
>   To see my meaning, consider that you talk frequently about getting
> mainstream biologists “out of the box” of description after the fact (i.e.,
> consequences of natural selection) and into the box of view life from its
> origins via first principles that allow for a mechanistic understanding
> more akin to the physical and chemical sciences.
>
>
>
> The Alice in Wonderland-out-of-the-box-shift that you frequently refer to
> is, in my language game, referencing the metaphysical system (i.e., the
> ideas or conceptual framework) that functions to interpret the data. The
> mainstream biological “box” that you are fighting against is the
> metaphysical system, and, as you have experienced, it is a very powerful
> force 😊.
>
>
>
> Best,
> G
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link: http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=
> 1
>

############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1


ATOM RSS1 RSS2