*Derick*, thanks: I'll definitely check that out!
*Gregg*: Wowza, I didn't realize UTOK theorized at the level of fundamental
physics. Have there been any updates to this lately (I see this diagram is
from 2001)?
*Untying the Gordian Knot* looks like a dense, fascinating (and expensive)
read! Perhaps this question has already been discussed before, but is there
an essential UTOK reading list/bibliography anywhere I could get my hands
on?
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 7:57 AM Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> John Vervaeke and I did a “mini book club” on Eastman’s book.
>
>
>
> His take on quantum field theory aligns directly with my view, which is
> symbolized by the “STEPPing Stone” in the Garden….
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* theory of knowledge society discussion <
> [log in to unmask]> *On Behalf Of *Derick Galea
> *Sent:* Friday, February 25, 2022 4:38 AM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* Re: Process Philosophy and the Metamodern Metanarrative
>
>
>
> *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
> ------------------------------
>
> Thank you Brendan, this was a great chat, you ask incisive questions!
>
>
>
> Matt has been hosting a series of discussions with Timothy Eastman on his
> book "Untying the Gordian Knot" at the Cobb Institute. I have found them
> enlightening and inspirational, so if you have some spare hours (just play
> them at 1.75 speed and you will feel like you are time travelling) I
> recommend delving into those. And when you grok his insights you can feel
> relatively smarter than Einstein (this might be an effect of listening at
> high speed, I don't guarantee any actual increase in intelligence).
>
>
>
> Tim Eastman Unties the Gordian Knot - Session 1 - YouTube
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.youtube.com_watch-3Fv-3DReM0-5FOPFCPc-26list-3DPLP5LzWhXomAL0I20u3AlZV7C-5F6nQeNoy6&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=YkZ3I8KE3Y62Q58TUfbP2j516-vrWgX_HAUT56K7fHA&s=sKksAhWqTgwIjVHO2Twa9VXu6p7uLgeiyBATS1QWqU0&e=>
>
>
>
> But seriously, if you want to tap into the unbounded potentiae, give it a
> listen.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Derick
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 4:44 AM Brendan Graham Dempsey <
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
> ------------------------------
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Thought some folks here might find this conversation pertinent. We discuss
> TOK and the complexification narrative through the lens of Whiteheadian
> process philosophy:
>
> *https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.youtube.com_watch-3Fv-3Dj-2DEgCakXA9Y&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=V-u5kO5f3dHlrVlnZIANB-xDmKzFN28omFMyiBb9rFw&s=ji_VU65XO90yFVjaSOT9xDvW5y3nW92pSJXWrpoYJBU&e=
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.youtube.com_watch-3Fv-3Dj-2DEgCakXA9Y&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=XJ1FUp1D9psLQX0p7Kg-6SY3AGH0Y2PEU841PxqzSVk&s=15qT5I5mlqQwkUa61-tvmSzxEQ9kczWBo9xyOHnh0WQ&e=>*
>
> SUMMARY:
>
> Dr. Matt Segall joins Brendan to talk about the relationship of process
> philosophy and the thinking of A. N. Whitehead to the formulation of an
> emerging metanarrative in metamodernity. In the context of our 13.7 billion
> years of emergent complexification, how does the story of consciousness
> evolution relate to issues such as dualism and the hard problem of
> consciousness, panpsychism, divine creativity, and mystical union?
>
>
>
> Dr. Segall's bio:
>
> Matthew D. Segall, PhD, received his doctoral degree in 2016 from the
> Philosophy, Cosmology, and Consciousness program at CIIS. His dissertation
> was titled Cosmotheanthropic Imagination in the Post-Kantian Process
> Philosophy of Schelling and Whitehead. It grapples with the limits to
> knowledge of reality imposed by Kant's transcendental form of philosophy
> and argues that Schelling and Whitehead's process-oriented approach
> (described in his dissertation as a "descendental" form of philosophy)
> shows the way across the Kantian threshold to renewed experiential contact
> with reality. He teaches courses on German Idealism and process philosophy
> for the Philosophy, Cosmology, and Consciousness program at CIIS. He blogs
> regularly at footnotes2plato.com
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__footnotes2plato.com&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=XJ1FUp1D9psLQX0p7Kg-6SY3AGH0Y2PEU841PxqzSVk&s=RcJf-b16syySWPxukHebvJrL4wI99ShWsSsIC9KiIY8&e=>
> .
>
> Cheers,
> Brendan
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>
############################
To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
|
