Stimulating to read, I must admit tho I am highly skeptical of this list.
Not that it isn't important or useful, but it wouldn't be wise to assume
that we can actually include all of the necessary theories and praxes just
from the input of those on this listserv and anyone who wants to throw
their own derivations up there. We are missing some big metaphysical
principles, and if the table is to represented by differences in
epistemology then I think the majority fall under the same naturalistic
umbrella. But where's Big History, certain religious and political
ideologies (someone mentioned neo-Marxism, which although I think most of
us would agree won't work but certainly has a seat at the epistemological
table), where's the Eastern Wisdom that several on this listserv purport?
My own ego is salty that a nondual perspective isn't represented (don't
worry I'll add it later 😅).

Please treat my skepticism as healthy, for I do recognize the importance of
this, and I do like Lee's idea of allowing people to edit the table on that
Wiki page, although we should monitor it so that it can evolve and filter
into a more efficiently designed and useful bunch of boxes filled with
words.

If we're going to do it then it needs to be done 'all the way' is my
feeling. Trouble is I barely understand half of what is even said on this
list because of all the language games that already occur informally. I
fear these boxes to be a Wittgensteinien nightmare in that sense.

Regards,

Nicholas G. Lattanzio, Psy.D.

On Wed, Dec 1, 2021, 5:52 AM Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> Chance,
>
>   Fascinating summary, thanks. I certainly can deeply align with the
> metaphor of simultaneously riding the digital wave while ontologically
> planting my feet through the wisdom stack. From Energy/Information to
> Matter to Life to Mind to Culture to the Digital Social Virtual Metaverse
> to the Garden under the Elephant Sun God, I am rotating my iQuad lenses to
> be oriented toward sustaining a coherent, integrated pluralistic wisdom
> energy line of being.
>
>
> Best,
>
> G
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* theory of knowledge society discussion <
> [log in to unmask]> *On Behalf Of *Chance McDermott
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 30, 2021 11:31 PM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* Re: TOK Approaches to Addressing the Meta-Crisis
>
>
>
> *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
> ------------------------------
>
> What we seem to be bracing for is the magnitude of the psychological
> effect of the digital wave and where, ontologically, we plant our feet.
>
>
>
> For example, Gregg seems to now suggest that the platform for the 21st
> century Western person is at the suture of the Enlightenment Gap.  Mark
> Stalhman, I believe, suggests we have to recess to Aristotle's
> understanding of the four causes to buttress Western civilization.
> Alexander Bard roots himself in Zoroastrianism.  Judaism is, of course,
> durable and well-positioned.   Zen Buddhism for the rest of us as a method
> for existing in the realm of hungry ghosts.
>
>
>
> Steve Bannon plants his feet on *economic nationalism*.  Behaviorally, *this
> is almost certainly where we will land* in the United States*.  *
> Probably it will be 1) militant Christianity for the struggling mass
> populus and 2) libertarianism and *whatever system listed above* by
> Brandon wins out as a dominant digital life ethic.
>
>
>
> Without a Lene Anderson Bildung 3.0, we seem poised for either the further
> penalization of the United States citizenry and/or the resurgence of
> industrial Protestantism for the masses.  Jordan Peterson will be
> vindicated.  Shelter and food for the stoic and hard working, and a
> predictable living hell for the lazy, pitiful, and negligent.
>
>
>
> As for the intellectually awakened/existentially frightened, *is Gregg's
> system not the most adequate secular perspective?  *The alternative is a
> suggestion to read "Camu" and learn to "imagine" sisyphus is happy.
>
>
>
> -Chance
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 9:18 PM Chance McDermott <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> Brandon,
>
>
>
> Thank you for organizing this chart and sharing.
>
>
>
> -Chance
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 10:49 AM lee simplyquality.org
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__simplyquality.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=lTSOGfJynwNBGLL-WXe5mQ3KKl0-i1etkDAfoOTInOw&s=ynNRZGFVGTdaF6PNeX4i3KBIM7wvD0nPrZXHwu-WRBU&e=>
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
> ------------------------------
>
> Brandon,
>
> Thanks for this.
>
> I adapted your table and created a Wikiversity page at:
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wikiversity.org_wiki_Level-5F5-5FResearch-5FCenter_Escaping-5FDiscontent&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=-hSlCpe_AKSAsznXioprX3WZd08hE3RobLFqzZ1W7yY&s=x29rKAMVVUb0iRhS8GQtMA_OX7HoqtmX-6DiZmyzqeY&e= 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wikiversity.org_wiki_Level-5F5-5FResearch-5FCenter_Escaping-5FDiscontent&d=DwMGaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=PlG-RgJo1zLkTW7JP-qTMac8twk_shzTWzk8AAdq5bU&s=RQ6n2VlciLakDs1cRvuK3Uv0P3dFVRFxwC8_WG6inN8&e=>
>
> I hope it is useful.
>
> I transformed the table format into paragraphs because it seems to be more
> flexible and a better use of space.
>
> I took the liberty of adding “Living Wisely” to the list.
>
> I added an assignment (students respond to direction).
>
>
>
> Please let me know your comments.
>
>
>
> I recommend we focus our continuing work on this topic by updating this
> Wikiversity page.
>
> Any of us can do that directly, or let me know if you want my help
> improving the page.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Lee Beaumont
>
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 29, 2021, at 10:35 PM, Brandon Norgaard <
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>
>
> *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
> ------------------------------
>
> Thanks to everyone who gave input on this.  I added in some additional
> details as requested.
>
>
>
> Jonathan: I suppose that’s the cartographer in me, always feeling the need
> to make these maps to categorize things.  It was the table you included in
> your 10 Flavors essay that inspired me to create this table, since I was
> figuring that there is a lot of agreement on these crises, but significant
> divergence on what we ought to going forward.  I acknowledge that people
> will rank these crises differently in terms of severity and in terms of
> root cause, and that is partially what creates this divergence.  I fully
> accept that the purpose of your essay was to encourage us to really taste
> the various flavors of this pickle that we’re in.  I read your essay
> shortly after it was published and I’ve had some time to reflect on it
> along with the others in the Dispatches anthology.  Having tasted it for a
> few months now, I’m willing to at least engage in *categorizing* the
> various approaches to addressing these great challenges.
>
>
>
> Lene: I’ve added Folk-Bildung 3.0 and I’m sorry I forgot to add that in
> the first place.
>
>
>
> Andrew: I am unsure how the LLP would contribute to this, except perhaps
> to add some details to the Peer to Peer entry?
>
>
>
> Nick: I’ve added an entry for The Regenerative Renaissance as well.  I had
> to edit down your description a bit to fit into the table.  I figure what
> you’re describing is a combination of Enlightenment 2.0 and Holistic
> Back-to-Nature and Ecology of Mind.  If there are elements in what you’re
> describing that are not really captured elsewhere, then whatever that might
> happen to be should be foregrounded within the description of this
> particular entry.  Also this makes me realize that some approaches are
> going to be combinations of 2 or more of these.  The leading members of the
> Game B community, for example, seem to go with a combination of
> Enlightenment 2.0 and techno-optimism.  But Game B is intellectually
> heterogenous, so I left it off the list.
>
>
>
> Gregg: Thanks for the complements.  I wasn’t sure if the Hanzi Freinacht
> approach essentially is based on Enlightenment 2.0 and thus would not need
> to be mentioned in its own entry.  Hanzi emphasizes psychological and
> socio-cultural development and also institutions.  I figure the Hanzi
> approach makes better sense if you start with the assumption of something
> close to the UTOK framework.  Would you agree?  Thoughts from others?
>
>
>
> Leland: Indeed, this would be a great start for a Wikiversity course.
> Feel free to copy this into a new page and some of us can then work on
> adding additional columns and details as necessary.  Some of these seem to
> partially overlap, whereas others have important points of disagreement.  I
> don’t have enough time to think about how best to group together and/or
> subcategorize these entries and right now I can’t think of what additional
> columns we might add, but that information will come if we publish it,
> either from myself or from others.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Approach to Addressing the Meta-Crisis*
>
> *Proponents*
>
> *Notes*
>
> Rational Optimistic Enlightenment
>
> We need a more full embrace and more widespread adoption throughout the
> world of what already has been shown to work, which are the values and
> psycho-technologies of the Age of Enlightenment, such as rationality,
> science, progress, skepticism, liberty, fraternity, equality, and getting
> away from ignorance, dogmatism, authority, tradition, superstition, and
> prejudice.  Postmodernism and critical theory have little or nothing of
> value to offer and are only diversions and roadblocks.
>
> Steven Pinker
>
> This is probably just a newer version of Enlightenment 1.0, so we might
> call it Enlightenment 1.5 or something
>
> Enlightenment 2.0
>
> We need to address the "Enlightenment Gap", which the first enlightenment
> never solved and which Enlightenment 1.5 doesn’t solve either.  This
> involves embracing enlightenment rationalism and postmodern critique,
> coming up with a coherent naturalistic ontology and more clear definitions
> for scientific terms that are taken for granted. This also involves new
> paradigms and new methodologies that embrace inner development integrated
> with science.
>
> Gregg Henriques, Hanzi Freinacht
>
>
>
> Conscious Evolution
>
> We can become mindful of the dynamics of the fundamental force of
> evolution and the relation to consciousness and this will awaken our
> collective capacity to overcome our challenges and create a better future.
> In socio-political terms, this hasn't been fully developed, despite Wilber
> claiming to have a "theory of everything" 20 years ago, since some of this
> is the subject of his forthcoming 3rd book in the Kosmos Trilogy.
>
> Ken Wilber
>
>
>
> Dark Renaissance
>
> Things will go dark almost inevitably, meaning that society will break
> down and a new dark age will result.  But some of us will be able to create
> new aesthetic movements to get things through in order to plant the seeds
> for an eventual rebirth, and some people are already working on this.
>
> Alexander Bard
>
>
>
> Techno-Optimistic
>
> Technological advancements will save humanity and will save our planet.
> Next-generation innovations will heroically avert any and all calamities.
> Humanity's best days are ahead because of the power of technology and
> innovation.
>
> Elon Musk
>
>
>
> Folk-Bildung 3.0
>
> This involves empowering everybody through bildung to act and take
> sustainable action where they are.  The formal political systems also ought
> to be there; they may not live up to our expectations, but if we want clean
> water in the pipes, modern medicine, food for 8 billion people, safe
> transportation, and solid science to back decisions, there also needs to be
> institutions and political with which to collaborate.
>
> Lene Rachel Andersen
>
>
>
> Peer to Peer
>
> This involves people cooperatively pooling their resources through commons
> in a way that is complementary to business and government with the idea
> that this can create prosperity for all.
>
> Michel Bauwens
>
>
>
> The Regenerative Renaissance / Bio-Transformation / “MettaModernism"
>
> This involves harnessing nature-based and biological insights and
> explicitly more feminine embodied intuitions and felt senses to
> paradigm-shift modernity, and its discontents, into regenerative business
> models and systems that temper and transform abstraction, extraction,
> accumulation, exploitation, and mechanistic thinking with lived
> experiences, expressions, and practices of interdependence, reciprocity,
> reverence, caring wholeness/healing. It means engaging in purpose-led
> systemic transformation and institutional innovation and entrepreneurial
> processes, where purpose is explicitly a felt experience of
> love/caring—free from personality patterns and cognitive distortions from
> developmental challenges—moving into action through constellations of
> people, data, and things (that have a business model attached).
>
> Nick Jankel
>
>
>
> Meta-Sensemaking
>
> We really need to greatly improve our sensemaking amid the panoptic
> bombardment of information and ever-shifting technology.
>
> Mark Stahlman via Marshall McLuhan
>
>
>
> Ecology of Mind
>
> We can use our understanding of ecology in conjunction with warm data and
> the nuances and complexities of various aspects of life to help us
> intuitively make better choices.
>
> Nora Bateson
>
>
>
> Revolutionary Anti-Capitalistic
>
> We need to overthrow the capitalist bourgoisie before they destroy the
> world with their unquenchable greed.
>
> Doctrinaire Marxists
>
>
>
> Holistic Back-to-Nature
>
> We need to re-discover our indigenous roots and live in harmony with
> nature, which will involve much less consumption and a dramatic decrease in
> industrialization.
>
> Greta Thunberg
>
>
>
> Doomer Defeatist
>
> There is no way to head off disaster so the best you can do is to save
> yourself and your family and maybe the members of the ethnic group that you
> identify with.
>
> Steve Bannon
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Brandon Norgaard
>
> *Founder, The Enlightened Worldview Project*
>
>
>
> *From:* theory of knowledge society discussion <
> [log in to unmask]> *On Behalf Of *Jonathan Rowson
> *Sent:* Monday, November 29, 2021 12:21 AM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* Re: TOK Approaches to Addressing the Meta-Crisis
>
>
>
> *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
> ------------------------------
>
> Hi Brandon,
>
>
>
> Thanks for sharing this initiative.
>
> The cartological hedonist in me is always happy to see conceptual
> classifications mapped out in tabular form, and I look forward to seeing
> the table populated.
>
>
>
> My slightly heretical view on this matter (which doesn't undermine the
> value of what you are doing at all) is that you are likely to find
> quite quickly that these approaches are actually responding to different
> things. I believe that's because it doesn't really make sense to think of
> the meta-crisis as singular (even as a singular higher order representation
> of multiple phenomena) because meta means so many things (alas, one more
> now due to Facebook becoming Meta, which risks supplanting the meaning of
> the others). This is not merely a pedantic point, but directly shapes our
> perception of how we should act and what a good vision(s) of the future
> might look like.
>
>
>
> It is true that all the problems are really one underlying problem, but
> it's *also* *at least* equally true that the one underlying problem is
> many problems.
>
>
>
> I am a pragmatist on such matters, so I'm arguing here not about
> underlying (ontological) reality but the efficacy of our epistemic tools to
> grapple with it and act with optimal discernment. In this respect, I came
> to the view that it's useful to distinguish between the
> reckoning(pandemic), the emergency (ecological), the crisis (governance)
> and to recognise that they have their own kind of problem, prior to
> invoking anything meta. Only then, and depending on your patience and
> appetite, I think we can make sense of around ten distinct meta-crises or,
> perhaps wiser, we can cluster them into four clusters with distinct
> punctuation as a way of showing their same-but-different nature. It's
> another conversation entirely, but for those who are interested, there is a
> glimpse in the table here
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__systems-2Dsouls-2Dsociety.com_wp-2Dcontent_uploads_2021_02_Tasting-2Dthe-2DPickle-2DTable.jpg&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=E-VjBap0M2pwmtSsasn2xJsb9AJswoARW6JMsL062-4&s=clrln8mtFGaJ23uQpl7QBysqGmi11bCa2PH5K08kee8&e=>,
> and the full story is outlined in the attached essay. I believe grasping
> that range of perspectives and experiencing them in your own life is what
> it means to 'taste the pickle'.
>
>
>
> All the best,
>
>
>
> Jonathan.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 07:52, Lene Rachel Andersen <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
> ------------------------------
>
> Hi Brandon,
>
> Excellent!
>
> How about folk-bildung 3.0 as we are working on it in the Global Bildung
> Network & Nordic Bildung: empowering everybody through bildung to act and
> take sustainable action where they are?
>
> The formal political systems also ought to be there; they may not live up
> to our expectations, but if we want clean water in the pipes, modern
> medicine, food for 8 billion people, safe transportation, and solid science
> to back decisions, there also needs to be institutions and political fora
> with which to collaborate.
>
> / Lene
>
> On 29-11-2021 08:13, Brandon Norgaard wrote:
>
> *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
> ------------------------------
>
> Hello everyone, I sent a message to this list a few days ago about how we
> might create a table comparing the different approaches to addressing the
> meta-crisis.  I figure that a lot of people and organizations agree that
> there are these several crises that are interdependent and interrelated
> (ecological, political, socio-cultural, economic, educational, meaning,
> etc.) but there are divergent opinions about what to do.  I still haven’t
> heard anyone clearly define this “dark renaissance” notion, but I took a
> stab at defining it here based on what I remember Bard saying a few months
> ago.  I’m intending this to be a conversation starter.  I figure several of
> you guys could improve upon what I have here.  Some of this might even be
> just plainly wrong.  Let me know what you think:
>
>
>
>
>
> *Approach to Addressing the Meta-Crisis*
>
> *Proponents*
>
> *Notes*
>
> Rational Optimistic Enlightenment
>
> We need a more full embrace and more widespread adoption throughout the
> world of what already has been shown to work, which are the values and
> psycho-technologies of the Age of Enlightenment, such as rationality,
> science, progress, skepticism, liberty, fraternity, equality, and progress
> and getting away from ignorance, dogmatism, authority, tradition,
> superstition, and prejudice.  Postmodernism and critical theory have little
> or nothing of value to offer and are only diversions and roadblocks.
>
> Steven Pinker
>
> This is probably just a newer version of Enlightenment 1.0, so we might
> call it Enlightenment 1.5 or something
>
> Enlightenment 2.0
>
> We need to address the "Enlightenment Gap", which the first enlightenment
> never solved and which Enlightenment 1.5 doesn’t solve either.  This
> involves embracing enlightenment rationalism and postmodern critique,
> coming up with a coherent naturalistic ontology and more clear definitions
> for scientific terms that are taken for granted. This also involves new
> paradigms and new methodologies that embrace inner development integrated
> with science.
>
> Gregg Henriques
>
>
>
> Conscious Evolution
>
> We can become mindful of the dynamics of the fundamental force of
> evolution and the relation to consciousness and this will awaken our
> collective capacity to overcome our challenges and create a better future.
> In socio-political terms, this hasn't been fully developed, despite Wilber
> claiming to have a "theory of everything" 20 years ago, since some of this
> is the subject of his forthcoming 3rd book in the Kosmos Trilogy.
>
> Ken Wilber
>
>
>
> Dark Renaissance
>
> Things will go dark almost inevitably, meaning that society will break
> down and a new dark age will result.  But some of us will be able to create
> new aesthetic movements to get things through in order to plant the seeds
> for an eventual rebirth, and some people are already working on this.
>
> Alexander Bard
>
>
>
> Techno-Optimistic
>
> Technological advancements will save humanity and will save our planet.
> Next-generation innovations will heroically avert any and all calamities.
> Humanity's best days are ahead because of the power of technology and
> innovation.
>
> Elon Musk
>
>
>
> Meta-Sensemaking
>
> We really need to greatly improve our sensemaking amid the panoptic
> bombardment of information and ever-shifting technology.
>
> Mark Stahlman via Marshall McLuhan
>
>
>
> Ecology of Mind
>
> We can use our understanding of ecology in conjunction with warm data and
> the nuances and complexities of various aspects of life to help us
> intuitively make better choices.
>
> Nora Bateson
>
>
>
> Revolutionary Anti-Capitalistic
>
> We need to overthrow the capitalist bourgeoisie before they destroy the
> world with their unquenchable greed.
>
> Doctrinaire Marxists
>
>
>
> Holistic Back-to-Nature
>
> We need to re-discover our indigenous roots and live in harmony with
> nature, which will involve much less consumption and a dramatic decrease in
> industrialization.
>
>
>
>
>
> Doomer Defeatist
>
> There is no way to head off disaster so the best you can do is to save
> yourself and your family and maybe the members of the ethnic group that you
> identify with.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Brandon Norgaard
>
> *Founder, The Enlightened Worldview Project*
>
>
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>
> --
> *Lene Rachel Andersen*
> Futurist, economist, author & keynote speaker
> President of Nordic Bildung and co-founder of the European Bildung Network
> Full member of the Club of Rome
> *Nordic Bildung*
> Vermlandsgade 51, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark
> www.nordicbildung.org
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.nordicbildung.org&d=DwMDaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=1mhEnZVLWmuEwSBQA2qwo065ZevmRvcFPNSx5kmDX3c&s=MJgClJfWBnYEBRHaFWNpDhYIdYR6GhYEl_NHiwXSsVM&e=>
> +45 28 96 42 40
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Dr. Jonathan Rowson
>
> Founding Director, Perspectiva
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.systems-2Dsouls-2Dsociety.com_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=E-VjBap0M2pwmtSsasn2xJsb9AJswoARW6JMsL062-4&s=VLAGzXSztdzIkSXKKWLjWyK4qiDrceJkfTARGJLZnDQ&e=>
>
> Research Fellow, CUSP
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.cusp.ac.uk_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=E-VjBap0M2pwmtSsasn2xJsb9AJswoARW6JMsL062-4&s=XEjPD64QA-y120_U7RCqqJzwiWnU1HBDGvTQbzY0l18&e=>
>
> Open Society Fellow
>
> Website
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.jonathanrowson.me&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=E-VjBap0M2pwmtSsasn2xJsb9AJswoARW6JMsL062-4&s=U7b2-b11mbQkiUfgIQtoCdyTh8iT3MHGqNHzOpRsHKo&e=>
>
> Twitter
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__jonathan-5Frowson_&d=DwMGaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=PlG-RgJo1zLkTW7JP-qTMac8twk_shzTWzk8AAdq5bU&s=mHK8Fpx3RRMRP_J4lx-37wccTNB-fgy1vzYHz9Gfuno&e=>
>
> LinkedIn
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_jonathan-2Drowson-2D14799a12b_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=E-VjBap0M2pwmtSsasn2xJsb9AJswoARW6JMsL062-4&s=C7mGSClgK4bOqJp7dpQA8aGMXELWZx6lU2q92uqSMLk&e=>
>
> *The Moves that Matter
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.amazon.co.uk_Moves-2Dthat-2DMatter-2DChess-2DGrandmaster_dp_1526603861&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=E-VjBap0M2pwmtSsasn2xJsb9AJswoARW6JMsL062-4&s=8bxX3LBb7F5fzLCUtVzgZyFuFniT1boClJAMISiDEEk&e=>:
> A Chess Grandmaster on the Game of Life* is published by Bloomsbury.
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>
>
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>

############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1