TOK-SOCIETY-L Archives

September 2020

TOK-SOCIETY-L@LISTSERV.JMU.EDU

Options: Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brent Allsop <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
tree of knowledge system discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 17 Sep 2020 20:48:20 -0600
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2377 bytes) , text/html (3621 bytes)
Hi Jack,

On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 8:32 PM James Lyons-Weiler <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi, Brent,
>
> Not sure that I implief that a culturally accepted label "red" is the same
> as the aware perception of redness.  The intrinsic quality of light waves
> at frequency of 700 nm is fundamental and is something that has existed
> long before humanity.
>
> So when we discuss a perception of "redness", called anything by any
> culture, we can also dissociate the exact arbitrary label, and in my
> thought experiment, the label turns out to be irrelevant.  Go to any
> hardware store and walk down the nuts and bolts aisle and don't look at the
> labels.  Eventually you will find some fastener or screw-like thing for
> which you have no label.  You can learn its identity well enough via visual
> inspection, and maybe even figure out its use.  You might never know the
> label, but you still experienced it and created a model of it in your
> brain.  Semantics and labels are irrelevant to perception and awareness of
> that perception.
>
> So in what I have shared I kept separate the (a) object, (b) the mind
> model of the object, (c) the mind model of the symbol (word or logoglyph)
> for the object, and active awareness of a and b (and for some but not most
> people, c). The card catalogue is not usually a conscious endeavor, but can
> be made so (word association and other memory association tricks and tools).
>
> In my view, Evolutionarily, our conscious perception almost certainly
> predates language as we would recognize it; labels adorn our mind model but
> are not necessary for our holding or experiencing them.
>

Yes, all of that seems obvious.  But none of this is denying that you use
one word or one label (or synonym for such) for all things red, and
therefore fall under the definition of using language that is qualia blind
or uses one word for all things red?


> If I am missing anything perhaps we can chat 1 on 1.  I would hate to have
> a superficial or peripheral grasp of the ideas you have organized.
>
> <http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1>
>
Yea, a 1 on 1 would be great.  Do you use skype?  My Skype ID is:
live:brent.allsop

############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1


ATOM RSS1 RSS2