TOK-SOCIETY-L Archives

July 2018

TOK-SOCIETY-L@LISTSERV.JMU.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mark Stahlman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
tree of knowledge system discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 11 Jul 2018 06:12:17 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (598 lines)
Waldemar &al:

I wonder how many on this list are old enough to remember the last  
"counter-culture" in the 1960s (and what they were doing then)?  In  
the summer of 1969, a new "underground" newspaper -- Madison  
Kaleidoscope -- launched in Madtown, WI, when I was about to enter my  
senior year at UW-Mad (majoring in evolutionary genetics and Buddhist  
theology), at roughly the same time that I married my high-school  
sweetheart, Laura Hanson at the local Frank Lloyd Wright Unitarian  
Church (a Norwegian descendant, whose father was the top ICC lawyer in  
the state, with a swimming pool in their back yard on the Westside.)

Within a few months, I would be arrested for assisting in the design  
of an underground drug laboratory (yes, I was talented at organic  
synthesis, or what today would be called "cooking") -- with police  
knocking down my backdoor in the middle of the night and held in  
solitary confinement -- then declared innocent, since the drugs  
involved were still legal (with all records expunged, thanks to the  
help of Laura's father), only to have the FBI files resurface when I  
was fingerprinted for my job on Wall Street in 1985.  Those were fun  
times . . . <g>

It began with a *Manifesto: Toward a New Culture* which had this to say --

I. The myth is that the American People are not paying for their share  
of Imperialism.  They are paying on Lake Mendota [where I used to sail  
and ice-skate] where sunburned men in their forties get hardons  
revving up their speedboats . . .

II. "Politics" is near-dead, poisoned like the fish in Wisconsin  
rivers -- all the oil and sewage and chemicals of Twentieth Century  
Progress poured into their veins.  When SDS [the local NCLC chapter of  
which I would later start] talks "politics" we wait for the Now We  
Know About America speech . . .

III. We want a Movement which flows from our lives.  American  
Capitalism says Bourgeois Sentimentality and a Quick Fuck; we say  
madlove and genital embrace, for hours, weeks months . . .

IV. We want a Movement which flows from our lives.  The dance of life  
in a bicycle parade [I would also later found the Yellow Jersey  
Bicycle Coop, my comrades having rejected my suggestion of "Hammer &  
Cycle"] not the Dance of Death in the ballet of police clubbing  
gassing fearing/hating . . .

V. We want a Movement which flows from our lives.  We WILL have  
something more fundamental than voting/masturbating and IN OUR  
LIFETIMES . . .

PANHISTORIC PREVISION - TOWARD A NEW CULTURE.

Let our Movement inscribe on society's diaphragms and skyscrappers:   
WE WILL BRING TO BIRTH A NEW WORLD FROM THE ASHES OF THE OLD  
DOUCHE-BAGS, TELEPHONE DIRECTORIES, AUTOMOBILE GRAVEYARDS AND  
CROSSYOUR HEART BRAS.  We will create a New Culture as we prepare for  
Revolution, finding allies in those sectors -- notably the blacks and  
industrial working class families -- most capable of realizing  
themselves in and for the collective tasks ahead.  We have begun to  
appear in a thousand guises across the world from the Red Guard [today  
I'm working with the Chinese government, composed largely of those  
sent to the country-side by the Red Guards] to the American  
Underground [likely referring to the Weathermen, a leader of which was  
accused of supporting Barack Obama].  WE ARE THE TROJAN HORSE OF OUR  
TIMES.  WE RIP OFF TROJANS [referring to the brand of condoms].

"Transform the World," said Marx.

"Change the Mind," said Rimbaud [about whom Marshall McLuhan, who  
rejected Marxism at Cambridge, instead wound up studying the French  
Symbolists]

"These are equally necessary for us to perform. Andre Breton [the  
surrealist, a poet from a very different paradigm]

https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__voices.revealdigital.com_cgi-2Dbin_independentvoices-3Fa-3Dd-26d-3DBHFGEAC19690623-26e-3D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2Den-2D20-2D-2D1-2D-2Dtxt-2DtxIN-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D-2D1-23&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=abPYMuDMtjupjhWVN90_0SmvdSl8azakG2l77IY_8YI&s=UN2MgB4CtpH6KlopqsIv27wOQFosf9Xa8Ed2YqO4V3M&e=

Mark
Quoting [log in to unmask]:

> Mark:
>
> Thank you for your reply.
> I await expectantly!
>
> Best regards,
>
> Waldemar
>
> Waldemar A Schmidt, PhD, MD
> (Perseveret et Percipiunt)
> 503.631.8044
>
> Strive not to be a success, but rather to be of value. (A Einstein)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Jul 10, 2018, at 4:28 PM, Mark Stahlman <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> Waldemar:
>>
>> No problem -- but you will have to wait for Gregg to return . . . !!
>>
>> The definitions you cite are fine so, as I mentioned, what I'm  
>> talking about is Thomas Kuhn's use of the term and, by chance, have  
>> you read that book (i.e. definition #1)?
>>
>> How do you think "patterns of thought" occur?  What might *cause*  
>> them to happen (the answers to which are why I'm waiting until  
>> Gregg can fully engage, as I'm sure you'll appreciate.)
>>
>> Btw, "pattern" of thought" implies nothing about its duration or,  
>> for that matter, whether a "system" is involved (or not).  It also  
>> tells us nothing about "ultimate truth" or even if that is a part  
>> of the "paradigm."
>>
>> While we're at it, "disturbances in the social fabric" also need a  
>> *cause* (which is most commonly technological change, or what  
>> McLuhan called "media"), as well as an explanation about how such  
>> changes produce "effects."
>>
>> Once we have gone over some basic issues, I assure you that the  
>> descriptions you are looking for will be the ones that *you*  
>> yourself will "grok," answering your own questions . . . <g>
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> P.S. To get a head-start, might I suggest that you take a look at  
>> McLuhan's "Laws of Media" (far more relevant than Wikipedia or  
>> Stanford, as it turns out) . . . ??
>>
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.amazon.com_Laws-2DMedia-2DScience-2DMarshall-2DMcLuhan_dp_0802077153&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=B8ibtmNSpGq4jqv4WdBt_1YucMlOalmIh-MBdDDGHbQ&s=KbBoQvMP7XfAswxTTiSUL2wuTiglL4qNrgARYNF7Q1E&e=  
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.amazon.com_Laws-2DMedia-2DScience-2DMarshall-2DMcLuhan_dp_0802077153&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=B8ibtmNSpGq4jqv4WdBt_1YucMlOalmIh-MBdDDGHbQ&s=KbBoQvMP7XfAswxTTiSUL2wuTiglL4qNrgARYNF7Q1E&e=>
>>
>> Quoting [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>:
>>
>>> Mark:
>>>
>>> Thank you for your response.
>>> Alas, what you have provided does not help me as much as I hope it would.
>>> I am like Joe M - I need help figuring this out.
>>>
>>> I am looking for your definition of the new paradigm and the old  
>>> paradigm which the new one replaced.
>>> For me, the word “paradigm” is well defined by the following:
>>>
>>> paradigm (plural paradigms  
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_paradigms-23English&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=4YCTxbQFCbjGbD_CDMCxjTw51yoJgTyWpQkrKjbaKJ0&e=  
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_paradigms-23English&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=4YCTxbQFCbjGbD_CDMCxjTw51yoJgTyWpQkrKjbaKJ0&e=>>)
>>> A pattern  
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_pattern&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=O0AI2__8dl5U0tKfA8Dc4BpMdv3AyiNKkzPFxMQ63HY&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_pattern&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=O0AI2__8dl5U0tKfA8Dc4BpMdv3AyiNKkzPFxMQ63HY&e=>>, a way <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_way&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=hZhs47l_4pGQjJGRBeYM7yVL26lgUxkQx1u2JlZGG1A&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_way&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=hZhs47l_4pGQjJGRBeYM7yVL26lgUxkQx1u2JlZGG1A&e=>> of doing <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_doing&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=18m2MIAX_Eo_9N8lY5pjAQA9b_UsY32L2M5u6IfrvnQ&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_doing&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=18m2MIAX_Eo_9N8lY5pjAQA9b_UsY32L2M5u6IfrvnQ&e=>> something <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_something&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=srf_0qeU2aFdvSwpXZFjKOQ_vKtQvJr8tECYMpplljc&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_something&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=srf_0qeU2aFdvSwpXZFjKOQ_vKtQvJr8tECYMpplljc&e=>>, especially <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_especially&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=ZDJl6BIVxkxSw-xeljxgZWBt4_b3uFDi_-Sc90bHMcs&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_especially&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=ZDJl6BIVxkxSw-xeljxgZWBt4_b3uFDi_-Sc90bHMcs&e=>> (now often pejorative <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_pejorative&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=NDQCNiGwMEjvS0083cRR6SDGDG_5WLCOqQEZeKBr8Q8&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_pejorative&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=NDQCNiGwMEjvS0083cRR6SDGDG_5WLCOqQEZeKBr8Q8&e=>>) a pattern <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_pattern&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=O0AI2__8dl5U0tKfA8Dc4BpMdv3AyiNKkzPFxM  
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_pattern&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=O0AI2__8dl5U0tKfA8Dc4BpMdv3AyiNKkzPFxM>!
>> Q63HY&e=> of thought  
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_thought&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=kxtXV951MHNWpdAAGyVigpP-pscfVZ5Nkg86vVZp6Cs&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_thought&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=kxtXV951MHNWpdAAGyVigpP-pscfVZ5Nkg86vVZp6Cs&e=>>, a system <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_system&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=upS3wT1oxKcdpUl7ONNU_b2cczosWkTKNi3SHlbk_8A&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_system&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=upS3wT1oxKcdpUl7ONNU_b2cczosWkTKNi3SHlbk_8A&e=>> of beliefs <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_belief&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=ertP49naCJQKqm4DtutObn8GGKQWDIiyNjxmMrF-oRg&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_belief&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=ertP49naCJQKqm4DtutObn8GGKQWDIiyNjxmMrF-oRg&e=>>, a conceptual <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_conceptual&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=c7p-zt-G0yDVc5bMO8kGS-Qb5dTG_Jju6zkCplD_New&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_conceptual&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=c7p-zt-G0yDVc5bMO8kGS-Qb5dTG_Jju6zkCplD_New&e=>>  
>> framework
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_framework&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=YJCvDUJExhfrCXE3GIkeGKXpYpdIxyHXavZdsPraEBA&e=  
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_framework&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=YJCvDUJExhfrCXE3GIkeGKXpYpdIxyHXavZdsPraEBA&e=>>.
>>> Synonyms: model  
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_model-23English&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=PX7vYmckhOlsZNrHcCgjEAj5_NB_-TsMmSKS0lOuuY0&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_model-23English&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=PX7vYmckhOlsZNrHcCgjEAj5_NB_-TsMmSKS0lOuuY0&e=>>, worldview <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_worldview-23English&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=Cvw_BlCKlfAd9xBcVilX12YC0mKf1k9t7A3K0So0NcI&e=  
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_worldview-23English&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=Cvw_BlCKlfAd9xBcVilX12YC0mKf1k9t7A3K0So0NcI&e=>>
>>> Thomas Kuhn's landmark “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions”  
>>> got people talking about paradigm shifts, to the point the word  
>>> itself now suggests an incomplete or biased perspective.
>>> An example  
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_example&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=SF4NfM4_JB3v5eGL1U2RpmEJdceVBKbqdhkyBYoUDw4&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_example&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=SF4NfM4_JB3v5eGL1U2RpmEJdceVBKbqdhkyBYoUDw4&e=>> serving as the model <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_model&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=xq_HGAqraTNpjkWSpEuIx8MqqVbRr9-ObFp1iEa3oo8&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_model&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=xq_HGAqraTNpjkWSpEuIx8MqqVbRr9-ObFp1iEa3oo8&e=>> for such <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_such&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=nxPoE1z11gE4-XfoKyoS2OXdhRfF3hXVewtFNDUqXdQ&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_such&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=nxPoE1z11gE4-XfoKyoS2OXdhRfF3hXVewtFNDUqXdQ&e=>> a pattern <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_pattern&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=O0AI2__8dl5U0tKfA8Dc4BpMdv3AyiNKkzPFxMQ63HY&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_pattern&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=O0AI2__8dl5U0tKfA8Dc4BpMdv3AyiNKkzPFxMQ63HY&e=>>. quotations ▼  
>>> <>
>>> Synonyms: template  
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_template-23English&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=moHEj5_QH7kf8CW_1SWFfqG3DtgmwEumXpRgV5YB8ak&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_template-23English&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=moHEj5_QH7kf8CW_1SWFfqG3DtgmwEumXpRgV5YB8ak&e=>>, exemplar <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_exemplar-23English&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=n5-DoQhhM-bUWzOF0VRpRANn41AI55wa0vsU_S1QsCg&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_exemplar-23English&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=n5-DoQhhM-bUWzOF0VRpRANn41AI55wa0vsU_S1QsCg&e=>>, posterboy <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_posterboy-23English&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=QYr61CcvLSOWlYCXKrNWU1v8G_T9wgqQebD13IZSTQs&e=  
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_posterboy-23English&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=QYr61CcvLSOWlYCXKrNWU1v8G_T9wgqQebD13IZSTQs&e=>>.
>>>
>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_paradigm&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=weugqa_qL29jQFhuGS3UO7rg-fRBNgJXs5qrnfV2sH8&e= <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_paradigm&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=weugqa_qL29jQFhuGS3UO7rg-fRBNgJXs5qrnfV2sH8&e=> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_paradigm&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=weugqa_qL29jQFhuGS3UO7rg-fRBNgJXs5qrnfV2sH8&e=  
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wiktionary.org_wiki_paradigm&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=bCavyhiTimak73nfdRxSOq2ha7M9RCNTO9jKESyZkT0&s=weugqa_qL29jQFhuGS3UO7rg-fRBNgJXs5qrnfV2sH8&e=>>
>>>
>>> For me, “paradigm” means a temporary, workable explanation for how  
>>> or why, or both, a system works.  It is not recognized as an  
>>> “ultimate truth” but as a working understanding and includes the  
>>> implication that further information or experience might modify  
>>> the current paradigm or understanding.
>>>
>>> I appreciate that “paradigm change” is explicitly associated with  
>>> a variety of “disturbances in the social fabric.”
>>> That is understandable, especially in terms of Henriques’ P + M ->  
>>> E formulation.
>>>
>>> What I am looking for is the definition/description of the “new  
>>> paradigm,” the “old paradigm,” and how they differ or are alike.
>>> Something like, for instance, the introductory paragraphs of a  
>>> Wikipedia (or other encyclopedic work, such as the Stanford  
>>> Encyclopedia of Philosophy, etc) article?
>>> Another example is the nature, similarity and difference between  
>>> Newton and Einstein’s perception of gravity.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Waldemar A Schmidt, PhD, MD
>>> (Perseveret et Percipiunt)
>>> 503.631.8044
>>>
>>> Strive not to be a success, but rather to be of value. (A Einstein)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Jul 10, 2018, at 1:06 PM, Mark Stahlman <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Waldemar:
>>>>
>>>> Great idea -- so, what does "paradigm" mean to you . . . ??
>>>>
>>>> Since the idea (in our context) comes from Thomas Kuhn, have you  
>>>> had a chance to read his book (written in 1958 and finally  
>>>> published in 1962)?
>>>>
>>>> I like to think of this in terms of what most people call  
>>>> "counter-cultures," a paradigm is a technology-driven shift of  
>>>> CULTURE (in the ToK Stack) and when one takes over from another,  
>>>> clashes are always going to happen.
>>>>
>>>> Since I'm 70 (born in 1948 in Boston, the same year my father  
>>>> graduated with a BS from MIT, on his way to an MA in Philosophy  
>>>> and PhD in History of Science), I was 19 years-old in 1967 when I  
>>>> bought a used Porsche 356C and drove it from Madison to  
>>>> Haight-Ashbury (then down the coast to see the Doors play at the  
>>>> Cheetah in LA).  Now *that* was a counter-culture experience . .  
>>>> . <g>
>>>>
>>>> Today -- as reflected in all the political and economic &c  
>>>> upheaval (which Gregg seems very engaged with from what I saw on  
>>>> his site) and endless talk about the *robots* taking over -- we  
>>>> are in the middle of another one (which appear to happen every  
>>>> 50+ years nowadays, driven by new technologies).  So, I'm not  
>>>> "predicting" so much as noticing what is already going on.
>>>>
>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.nytimes.com_2018_07_09_books_review_future-2Dof-2Dwork-2Ddarrell-2Dm-2Dwest.html&d=DwIDaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=0UR2VYwQ3vSQmQ-K5FB4WmZPxAqBWeJRccvT9-Sv7w8&s=aPRM31jMkEVpgc3_UEv5hnJS7fGdARhy658rxkeFOa8&e=
>>>>
>>>> This is what it feels like when a *new* paradigm (as I understand  
>>>> the term) takes over our lives and it feels like we're all along  
>>>> for the ride . . . !!
>>>>
>>>> Does that help?
>>>>
>>>> Mark
>>>>
>>>> Quoting "Waldemar A Schmidt, PhD, MD" <[log in to unmask]>:
>>>>
>>>>> A suggestion:
>>>>>
>>>>> 	Perhaps, it would help if we had a brief definition, statement,  
>>>>> or synopsis, of what:
>>>>>
>>>>> 		1.  John considers to be the central nature of the paradigm he  
>>>>> is proposing.
>>>>> 		2.  Mark considers to be the central nature of: a. The new  
>>>>> paradigm in which we find ourselves and b.  The previous/old  
>>>>> paradigm which was replaced by the new paradigm.
>>>>>
>>>>> That way we could be reassured that we are reading, thinking,  
>>>>> talking, and writing about the same things.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards to all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Waldemar
>>>>>
>>>>> Waldemar A Schmidt, PhD, MD
>>>>> (Perseveret et Percipiunt)
>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jul 10, 2018, at 10:54 AM, Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx  
>>>>>> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>> Thanks much for the stimulating contributions. I will offer  
>>>>>> some thoughts soon, so that perhaps we can sort out where it is  
>>>>>> where we are standing, both as a group and as individuals who  
>>>>>> have all been on long and intense journeys trying to figure out  
>>>>>> some of the most complex problems in philosophy. I think we all  
>>>>>> have interesting things to say.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Warm regards to all!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> G
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jul 10, 2018, at 1:16 PM, Diop, Corinne Joan Martin -  
>>>>>>> diopcj <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Mark,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you-- and thank you also for the correction! Cantor has  
>>>>>>> emerged again in a small body of work I am doing on people  
>>>>>>> named Georg(e/es), so I will be sure to look into this  
>>>>>>> intrigue before exhibiting/writing about it again! (The others  
>>>>>>> are Braque, Gurdjieff and Sand...)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Corinne
>>>>>>> ________________________________________
>>>>>>> From: tree of knowledge system discussion  
>>>>>>> [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Mark Stahlman  
>>>>>>> [[log in to unmask]]
>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, July 9, 2018 2:04 PM
>>>>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: New Paradigms
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Corrine:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks -- fascinating and beautifully done . . . !!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Small correction, if you don't mind.  Galileo's astronomy didn't
>>>>>>> really "threaten" anything and his problems with the Church were quite
>>>>>>> different from the usual accounts, having more to with his anti-Rome
>>>>>>> Venetian backers (btw, my "godfather" Giorgio Desantillana wrote the
>>>>>>> one-time "definitive" work on the topic and my father helped to design
>>>>>>> what is now the Galileo Museum in Florence) and it was Cantor who
>>>>>>> approached Franzelin, who pretty much blew him off (i.e. the Church
>>>>>>> really didn't care what he was doing).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.amazon.com_Crime-2DGalileo-2DGiorgio-2DSantillana_dp_0226734811&d=DwIDaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=8qMQODcDkzHIMIPWHwejYDRD8zDMlzuSjEgeHBa8lGA&s=Bfq1ppMS3XgQnnQpYnIZ8wC_97XYRZJRxUuB1rAMdwc&e=
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mark
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> P.S. The usual reports about G. Bruno's troubles are also mistaken.
>>>>>>> It had little to do with his "heresy."  In fact, as best as I can
>>>>>>> tell, he was an "agent" of the English spymaster Walsingham and was
>>>>>>> caught organizing against the Vatican.  We often forget how much
>>>>>>> "intrigue" was going on in those days and how often Rome was on the
>>>>>>> receiving end (as well as dishing it out) -- plus how they were
>>>>>>> finally defeated in the mid-19th century after many centuries of
>>>>>>> declining influence.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wikipedia.org_wiki_Francis-5FWalsingham&d=DwIDaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=8qMQODcDkzHIMIPWHwejYDRD8zDMlzuSjEgeHBa8lGA&s=IYy1BIydW2s5dWUnNTYIYOmAhcjKtdkXhsxHKkAcdVo&e=
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Quoting "Diop, Corinne Joan Martin - diopcj" <[log in to unmask]>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just sharing some of my artwork that relates a bit :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Sizing the Infinite, Seeking Eternity," about Georg Cantor was
>>>>>>>> done in collaboration with E. Theta Brown, Associate Professor of Math
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cover and pp. 11 – 16. (Photographs and essay.)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__kapsula.ca_releases_KAPSULA-5FGOODMEASURE-5F3of3.pdf&d=DwIDaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=8qMQODcDkzHIMIPWHwejYDRD8zDMlzuSjEgeHBa8lGA&s=BwEKKzPLdUHIfojBBcw4PN3O97YYW0fasOi23LN38O0&e=
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Corinne
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> PS I have artwork about Gregg's ideas from some years ago that got
>>>>>>>> buried somewhere in my studio after a move-- when I unearth it I
>>>>>>>> will share!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Corinne Diop
>>>>>>>> Professor of Art
>>>>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.facebook.com_corinne.diop.studio_&d=DwIDaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=8qMQODcDkzHIMIPWHwejYDRD8zDMlzuSjEgeHBa8lGA&s=KwQnikKeu_aL_IJaCKzcXiouQheSnbFsIVXtYmyKCZg&e=
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Photography Area Head
>>>>>>>> http://www.jmu.edu/artandarthistory/programs/Photography.shtml
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> School of Art, Design, and Art History
>>>>>>>> MSC 7101/ 820 S. Main St
>>>>>>>> James Madison University
>>>>>>>> Harrisonburg, VA  22807
>>>>>>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>>>>>> (540) 568-6485
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    *************
>>>>>>>> JMU Safe Zone Member
>>>>>>>> http://www.jmu.edu/safezone
>>>>>>>> ________________________________________
>>>>>>>> From: tree of knowledge system discussion
>>>>>>>> [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Mark Stahlman
>>>>>>>> [[log in to unmask]]
>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, July 9, 2018 10:13 AM
>>>>>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>>>>>> Subject: New Paradigms
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> John/Joe/Gregg &al:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What Gregg has done here may be the *first* time this has ever been
>>>>>>>> accomplished (or perhaps even attempted).  While many have
>>>>>>>> "philosophized" over all this, Gregg has actually assembled a group
>>>>>>>> of experts (which decades of detailed knowledge as well as
>>>>>>>> experience arguing with their domain-expert colleagues.)  Hurray . .
>>>>>>>> . !!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tree of Knowledge Stack
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Culture :: Sociology (Joe)
>>>>>>>> Mind :: Psychology (Gregg)
>>>>>>>> Life :: Biology (John)
>>>>>>>> Matter :: Physics (???)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Does the "lower" define the "upper" or are there new *principles*
>>>>>>>> that must be added at each level (or what Gregg calls "dimensions of
>>>>>>>> complexity") . . . ??
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In the 19th-century, during what was a very different paradigm from
>>>>>>>> the one in which we live Bernhard Reimann suggested what some call
>>>>>>>> the "hypothesis of the higher hypothesis" and Georg Cantor generated
>>>>>>>> his Transfinite schema in attempts to *rigorously* tackle this
>>>>>>>> conundrum.  Both of them have largely been forgotten today and this
>>>>>>>> was replaced with the notion of a "Theory of Everything" (ToE) and
>>>>>>>> "Unity of Science" (as per Carnap &al) in the 20th-century -- as a
>>>>>>>> result of the new paradigm in which those scientists lived (but not
>>>>>>>> the same one as ours).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Quantum" physics caught many people's attention and, for a while,
>>>>>>>> seemed to be the answer -- but then it failed to produce a ToE and
>>>>>>>> dissolved into a group of rival splinters until it was revived by
>>>>>>>> some "hippies" who were living under yet-another paradigm (yes, as
>>>>>>>> it turns out, I know Jack Sarfatti and he is an entertaining sorta
>>>>>>>> guy, whose ideas were enhanced by both some LSD and some
>>>>>>>> "conspiracies" that he imagines he was a part of) . . . <g>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.amazon.com_How-2DHippies-2DSaved-2DPhysics-2DCounterculture_dp_039334231X&d=DwIDaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=8qMQODcDkzHIMIPWHwejYDRD8zDMlzuSjEgeHBa8lGA&s=z21gNwg3Phhb8zDjPEWwYZZnnuOW0Vep1M486cPwhDQ&e=
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So much for physics -- but wait there is more!  The US *military*
>>>>>>>> decided it wanted to take some Los Alamos bomb-desingers and shuffle
>>>>>>>> them across-the-street to a new place that was called the Santa Fe
>>>>>>>> Institute, to see if the physics of nuclear weapons (i.e.
>>>>>>>> mini-stars) could be applied to society.  The Department of Energy
>>>>>>>> (which owns the US arsenal, not the service branches) initially
>>>>>>>> funded them 100% (and now it's 30% with another 30% coming from
>>>>>>>> Pierre Omidyar).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.santafe.edu_&d=DwIDaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=8qMQODcDkzHIMIPWHwejYDRD8zDMlzuSjEgeHBa8lGA&s=AWiCJq0W3SGK9QXs99_ukwq3kcCNbrSUTQmPezjvzTE&e=
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The result was "complexity science" -- re-branding "chaos," since
>>>>>>>> that frightens the children -- and its elaborate models of
>>>>>>>> "emergence."  Some of us from the Center spent last Spring with
>>>>>>>> these folks (in particular, Jim Rutt, long-time chairman and now
>>>>>>>> trustee at Santa Fe) and I can tell you they don't have a clue (and
>>>>>>>> are unlikely to ever get one.)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, Physics as failed (multiple times).  How about Biology or
>>>>>>>> Psychology or Sociology?  As John tells us, biology is broken.  As,
>>>>>>>> Gregg tells us, psychology is broken.  As Joe tells us, sociology is
>>>>>>>> broken.  So, what are we going to do . . . ??
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My suggestion is that we take a look at *paradigms* behind these
>>>>>>>> approaches and their causes/effects.  This is the study of the
>>>>>>>> "structure of scientific revolutions" (as per Thomas Kuhn, although
>>>>>>>> he never explained either the causes or effects) and, to accomplish
>>>>>>>> that task, we will need Marshall McLuhan -- which we will do when
>>>>>>>> Gregg returns.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.amazon.com_Structure-2DScientific-2DRevolutions-2D50th-2DAnniversary_dp_0226458121&d=DwIDaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=8qMQODcDkzHIMIPWHwejYDRD8zDMlzuSjEgeHBa8lGA&s=Wjt2pfZZFEZZ8hHd1Gi8N-e6L0fJp0jNpkVaXTqhbOw&e=
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To do this, we will have to do something that has been "forgotten"
>>>>>>>> for 400+ years -- understand *formal* cause.  Fortunately, Aristotle
>>>>>>>> is there to help us (since he's the one who came up with this idea
>>>>>>>> in the first place, 2500 years ago) and, even more fortuitously, we
>>>>>>>> are now in a new paradigm (otherwise, we wouldn't be having this
>>>>>>>> conversation).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mark
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> P.S. The previous paradigm was characterized by "globalism" and what
>>>>>>>> was called the "new world order" (i.e. the one that Kuhn was
>>>>>>>> plumping for, as funded by the Ford Foundation) and it has now
>>>>>>>> collapsed.  Yes, this is what keeps Henry Kissinger awake at night.
>>>>>>>> This is why Trump was elected, Briexit occured and the 5 Star
>>>>>>>> Movement now runs Italy &c.  This is also why we are now in another
>>>>>>>> "counter-culture" (parallel to the 60s), since that's what happens
>>>>>>>> to *culture* when paradigms shift (over-and-over, making its
>>>>>>>> explanation a top priority for a "pure" sociology).  This is the
>>>>>>>> focus of my Center (and,, yes, I also know John Ralston Saul).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.amazon.com_Collapse-2DGlobalism-2DJ-2DR-2DSaul_dp_1786494485&d=DwIDaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=8qMQODcDkzHIMIPWHwejYDRD8zDMlzuSjEgeHBa8lGA&s=4kvjg0j27G60OZOmJLQm4GmRSyKFwNZpRY6JwkeZ9WY&e=
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> P.P.S.  The "cheerio conspiracy" in all this is that the *center* of
>>>>>>>> maintaining that now obsolete paradigm was the Government
>>>>>>>> Communications Head-Quarters (GCHQ) which is the foundation of what
>>>>>>>> some now call the "Deep State."  Edward Snowden had a lot to say
>>>>>>>> about them in terms of their acronym, "Five Eyes," making Trump's
>>>>>>>> upcoming meeting with the Queen very interesting -- since the "Deep
>>>>>>>> State" actually reports to her (yes, making Canada an actual
>>>>>>>> national security threat) . . . !!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wikipedia.org_wiki_Five-5FEyes&d=DwIDaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=8qMQODcDkzHIMIPWHwejYDRD8zDMlzuSjEgeHBa8lGA&s=s3ScNTD00fGwqUNtQsPGQEQcsbcSOwQaTNEYyxaajZA&e=
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> P.P.P.S. Since our confusion about all this has been going on for a
>>>>>>>> long-time, we will have to "drop back" and try to recover what
>>>>>>>> previous paradigms -- such as the "Enlightenment" &c -- have
>>>>>>>> destroyed.  That is the origin of the "motto" on the Center website
>>>>>>>> that "Digital *retrieves* the Medieval" and, from ISIS reviving
>>>>>>>> *medieval* Jihad, to the Chinese reviving the *medieval* "Silk
>>>>>>>> Road," it is already the world in which we live.  As Marty McKly put
>>>>>>>> it, "Doc, it's time to go back to the future" . . . <g>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wikipedia.org_wiki_Back-5Fto-5Fthe-5FFuture&d=DwIDaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=8qMQODcDkzHIMIPWHwejYDRD8zDMlzuSjEgeHBa8lGA&s=B4o24kuAh19SX2ks1cGJ_arOZDTP30QffE62ZH6ORwI&e=
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> P.P.P.P.S. What we have to try to avoid, as difficult as it may be,
>>>>>>>> is to not behave "like a drunk looking for our carkeys underneath
>>>>>>>> the streetlamp, because that's where the light is."  The recently
>>>>>>>> past paradigms have seriously screwed us up.  This is why we are in
>>>>>>>> such terrible condition -- which, btw, is not the situation in
>>>>>>>> China, where its historic civilization is now the focus of study at
>>>>>>>> the Central Party School (where CPC cadre are trained in Beijing) --
>>>>>>>> and *all* of our attempts at "coherence" have failed.  But, we're in
>>>>>>>> luck, Aristotle is there to help us (which is why Summer School at
>>>>>>>> the Center is teaching his 4th-century BC "On the Soul".)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.amazon.com_Soul-2DMemory-2DRecollection-2DAristotle_dp_1888009179&d=DwIDaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=8qMQODcDkzHIMIPWHwejYDRD8zDMlzuSjEgeHBa8lGA&s=tcrM699HyAbsXoXcHy52dE-oXdz66F8YcxXYBoZt4iY&e=
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ############################
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
>>>>>>>> mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:mailto:[log in to unmask]> or click the following  
>>>>>>>> link:
>>>>>>>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ############################
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
>>>>>>>> write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
>>>>>>>> or click the following link:
>>>>>>>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ############################
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
>>>>>>> write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
>>>>>>> or click the following link:
>>>>>>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ############################
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
>>>>>>> write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
>>>>>>> or click the following link:
>>>>>>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ############################
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
>>>>>> write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
>>>>>> or click the following link:
>>>>>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ############################
>>>>>
>>>>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
>>>>> write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
>>>>> or click the following link:
>>>>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>>>>
>>>> ############################
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
>>>> write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
>>>> or click the following link:
>>>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ############################
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
>>> write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]  
>>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>>> or click the following link:
>>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1  
>>> <http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1>
>>
>> ############################
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
>> write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]  
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> or click the following link:
>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1  
>> <http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1>
>
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
> write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
> or click the following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1

############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1

ATOM RSS1 RSS2