TOK-SOCIETY-L Archives

April 2024

TOK-SOCIETY-L@LISTSERV.JMU.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Marcia Gralha <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
UTOK Society listserv <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 2 Apr 2024 11:23:10 -0300
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2782 bytes) , text/html (4 kB)
Excellent, and much needed. Getting clear about core terminology in a
discussion such as this one is not optional.

On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 10:37 AM Henriques, Gregg - henriqgx <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi UTOK Folks,
>
> Ever since I have seen Robert Sapolsky yammering on about how the only
> things that have causal powers in the world are physical and biological
> entities, I have been meaning to etch out the basic UTOK position on the
> Free Will v. Determinism Debate.
>
>
>
>   Here it is:
>
>
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmedium.com%2Funified-theory-of-knowledge%2Futoks-take-on-the-free-will-versus-determinism-debate-3f051e77dd31&data=05%7C02%7CTOK-SOCIETY-L%40listserv.jmu.edu%7C7f4ea17d26084e4d99c608dc53207384%7Ce9333c23cac742f499895cee3d4a79c0%7C0%7C0%7C638476646041466923%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=0uey45X%2FqzOzwAszgOeAv3caNUtTjvKyQtAiAWKP6M4%3D&reserved=0
> <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmedium.com%2Funified-theory-of-knowledge%2Futoks-take-on-the-free-will-versus-determinism-debate-3f051e77dd31&data=05%7C02%7CTOK-SOCIETY-L%40listserv.jmu.edu%7C7f4ea17d26084e4d99c608dc53207384%7Ce9333c23cac742f499895cee3d4a79c0%7C0%7C0%7C638476646041466923%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=0uey45X%2FqzOzwAszgOeAv3caNUtTjvKyQtAiAWKP6M4%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
>   The short answer is that philosophers have long screwed this up as a
> function of the Enlightenment Gap and a failure to generate even a
> partially adequate model of the human mind and mental causation. This essay
> gives the minimum necessary framing to avoid all the incredibly misguided
> stuff that has been said about this issue, at least from an
> endo-naturalistic perspective like UTOKs.
>
>
> Best,
> G
> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flistserv.jmu.edu%2Fcgi-bin%2Fwa%3FSUBED1%3DTOK-SOCIETY-L%26A%3D1&data=05%7C02%7CTOK-SOCIETY-L%40listserv.jmu.edu%7C7f4ea17d26084e4d99c608dc53207384%7Ce9333c23cac742f499895cee3d4a79c0%7C0%7C0%7C638476646041466923%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=JjBPwDtW4FEKxbdDOlcQhyGDkhJbnQvSqrw6vhTHJoc%3D&reserved=0
>

############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1


ATOM RSS1 RSS2