Interestingly, as Brandon well knows,  I participate in most of these
narratives at once.

P2P, techno optimism, meta sensemaking most often lately... I even recently
wrote with a technology pessimist doomer-esque thinker, Michael Rectenwald.

As I was discussing with my "build anarchist" buddy Naomi Most today (a
leader of Noisebridge hackerspace in San Francisco), I am a permanent
outsider , not a joiner. A participant observer, which is where my alias
"Gonzo Ethicist" comes from. I rely on individual friendships and
collaboration as I pass through the tribes. I practice gonzo like Hunter s
Thompson but not as a journalist... I do it as a meta actor who acts
entirely in response to interpersonal ethics rather than group ideas. I
literally seek out relationships with the most morally intelligent people
regardless of their tribe, and I let moral situations dictate my
affiliations rather than doctrines or goals. When the moral situation
shifts, I follow the connecting nodes to the next compelling moral
situation, p2p. Very few people live their lives this way but it was a
favorite approach of the "bohemian" writers, like Walt Whitman and Mark
Twain... morally brilliant writers who lived their lives situation to
situation rather than institutionally or dogmatically... my friends Michael
Rectenwald and Michel Bauwens exhibit similar tendencies and are much more
complex people than their public personas (Michel is so much more than the
p2p guy, he just ran with the momentum of it to the point he was a leading
evangelist).

All my identities are Meta, and I collaborate with leaders of every kind of
Meta thinking on this chart except two: marxist and bildung. The Marxists
don't play well with others and are one of my few true ideological enemies
because of their history.

When you have no tribe, you are a tribe of one, and live entirely p2p, and
make sense of things for others- you are permanently meta.


On Tue, Nov 30, 2021, 11:31 PM Chance McDermott <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
> ------------------------------
> What we seem to be bracing for is the magnitude of the psychological
> effect of the digital wave and where, ontologically, we plant our feet.
>
> For example, Gregg seems to now suggest that the platform for the 21st
> century Western person is at the suture of the Enlightenment Gap.  Mark
> Stalhman, I believe, suggests we have to recess to Aristotle's
> understanding of the four causes to buttress Western civilization.
> Alexander Bard roots himself in Zoroastrianism.  Judaism is, of course,
> durable and well-positioned.   Zen Buddhism for the rest of us as a method
> for existing in the realm of hungry ghosts.
>
> Steve Bannon plants his feet on *economic nationalism*.  Behaviorally, *
> this is almost certainly where we will land* in the United States*.  *Probably
> it will be 1) militant Christianity for the struggling mass populus and 2)
> libertarianism and *whatever system listed above* by Brandon wins out as
> a dominant digital life ethic.
>
> Without a Lene Anderson Bildung 3.0, we seem poised for either the further
> penalization of the United States citizenry and/or the resurgence of
> industrial Protestantism for the masses.  Jordan Peterson will be
> vindicated.  Shelter and food for the stoic and hard working, and a
> predictable living hell for the lazy, pitiful, and negligent.
>
> As for the intellectually awakened/existentially frightened, *is Gregg's
> system not the most adequate secular perspective?  *The alternative is a
> suggestion to read "Camu" and learn to "imagine" sisyphus is happy.
>
> -Chance
>
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 9:18 PM Chance McDermott <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
>> Brandon,
>>
>> Thank you for organizing this chart and sharing.
>>
>> -Chance
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 10:49 AM lee simplyquality.org
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__simplyquality.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=lTSOGfJynwNBGLL-WXe5mQ3KKl0-i1etkDAfoOTInOw&s=ynNRZGFVGTdaF6PNeX4i3KBIM7wvD0nPrZXHwu-WRBU&e=>
>> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click
>>> links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
>>> content is safe.
>>> ------------------------------
>>> Brandon,
>>> Thanks for this.
>>> I adapted your table and created a Wikiversity page at:
>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wikiversity.org_wiki_Level-5F5-5FResearch-5FCenter_Escaping-5FDiscontent&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=2nN47lz4lhcnjfPR_fPnzSsYqT14b-MYHvmiCFa-fdE&s=q8RfrOnK8lV0g_pWf4pnHzmFMysDAnSBKn4G46833Xk&e= 
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wikiversity.org_wiki_Level-5F5-5FResearch-5FCenter_Escaping-5FDiscontent&d=DwMGaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=PlG-RgJo1zLkTW7JP-qTMac8twk_shzTWzk8AAdq5bU&s=RQ6n2VlciLakDs1cRvuK3Uv0P3dFVRFxwC8_WG6inN8&e=>
>>> I hope it is useful.
>>> I transformed the table format into paragraphs because it seems to be
>>> more flexible and a better use of space.
>>> I took the liberty of adding “Living Wisely” to the list.
>>> I added an assignment (students respond to direction).
>>>
>>> Please let me know your comments.
>>>
>>> I recommend we focus our continuing work on this topic by updating this
>>> Wikiversity page.
>>> Any of us can do that directly, or let me know if you want my help
>>> improving the page.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Lee Beaumont
>>>
>>>
>>> On Nov 29, 2021, at 10:35 PM, Brandon Norgaard <
>>> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>
>>> *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click
>>> links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
>>> content is safe.
>>> ------------------------------
>>> Thanks to everyone who gave input on this.  I added in some additional
>>> details as requested.
>>>
>>> Jonathan: I suppose that’s the cartographer in me, always feeling the
>>> need to make these maps to categorize things.  It was the table you
>>> included in your 10 Flavors essay that inspired me to create this table,
>>> since I was figuring that there is a lot of agreement on these crises, but
>>> significant divergence on what we ought to going forward.  I acknowledge
>>> that people will rank these crises differently in terms of severity and in
>>> terms of root cause, and that is partially what creates this divergence.  I
>>> fully accept that the purpose of your essay was to encourage us to really
>>> taste the various flavors of this pickle that we’re in.  I read your essay
>>> shortly after it was published and I’ve had some time to reflect on it
>>> along with the others in the Dispatches anthology.  Having tasted it for a
>>> few months now, I’m willing to at least engage in *categorizing* the
>>> various approaches to addressing these great challenges.
>>>
>>> Lene: I’ve added Folk-Bildung 3.0 and I’m sorry I forgot to add that in
>>> the first place.
>>>
>>> Andrew: I am unsure how the LLP would contribute to this, except perhaps
>>> to add some details to the Peer to Peer entry?
>>>
>>> Nick: I’ve added an entry for The Regenerative Renaissance as well.  I
>>> had to edit down your description a bit to fit into the table.  I figure
>>> what you’re describing is a combination of Enlightenment 2.0 and Holistic
>>> Back-to-Nature and Ecology of Mind.  If there are elements in what you’re
>>> describing that are not really captured elsewhere, then whatever that might
>>> happen to be should be foregrounded within the description of this
>>> particular entry.  Also this makes me realize that some approaches are
>>> going to be combinations of 2 or more of these.  The leading members of the
>>> Game B community, for example, seem to go with a combination of
>>> Enlightenment 2.0 and techno-optimism.  But Game B is intellectually
>>> heterogenous, so I left it off the list.
>>>
>>> Gregg: Thanks for the complements.  I wasn’t sure if the Hanzi Freinacht
>>> approach essentially is based on Enlightenment 2.0 and thus would not need
>>> to be mentioned in its own entry.  Hanzi emphasizes psychological and
>>> socio-cultural development and also institutions.  I figure the Hanzi
>>> approach makes better sense if you start with the assumption of something
>>> close to the UTOK framework.  Would you agree?  Thoughts from others?
>>>
>>> Leland: Indeed, this would be a great start for a Wikiversity course.
>>> Feel free to copy this into a new page and some of us can then work on
>>> adding additional columns and details as necessary.  Some of these seem to
>>> partially overlap, whereas others have important points of disagreement.  I
>>> don’t have enough time to think about how best to group together and/or
>>> subcategorize these entries and right now I can’t think of what additional
>>> columns we might add, but that information will come if we publish it,
>>> either from myself or from others.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Approach to Addressing the Meta-Crisis*
>>> *Proponents*
>>> *Notes*
>>> Rational Optimistic Enlightenment
>>> We need a more full embrace and more widespread adoption throughout the
>>> world of what already has been shown to work, which are the values and
>>> psycho-technologies of the Age of Enlightenment, such as rationality,
>>> science, progress, skepticism, liberty, fraternity, equality, and getting
>>> away from ignorance, dogmatism, authority, tradition, superstition, and
>>> prejudice.  Postmodernism and critical theory have little or nothing of
>>> value to offer and are only diversions and roadblocks.
>>> Steven Pinker
>>> This is probably just a newer version of Enlightenment 1.0, so we might
>>> call it Enlightenment 1.5 or something
>>> Enlightenment 2.0
>>> We need to address the "Enlightenment Gap", which the first
>>> enlightenment never solved and which Enlightenment 1.5 doesn’t solve
>>> either.  This involves embracing enlightenment rationalism and postmodern
>>> critique, coming up with a coherent naturalistic ontology and more clear
>>> definitions for scientific terms that are taken for granted. This also
>>> involves new paradigms and new methodologies that embrace inner development
>>> integrated with science.
>>> Gregg Henriques, Hanzi Freinacht
>>>
>>> Conscious Evolution
>>> We can become mindful of the dynamics of the fundamental force of
>>> evolution and the relation to consciousness and this will awaken our
>>> collective capacity to overcome our challenges and create a better future.
>>> In socio-political terms, this hasn't been fully developed, despite Wilber
>>> claiming to have a "theory of everything" 20 years ago, since some of this
>>> is the subject of his forthcoming 3rd book in the Kosmos Trilogy.
>>> Ken Wilber
>>>
>>> Dark Renaissance
>>> Things will go dark almost inevitably, meaning that society will break
>>> down and a new dark age will result.  But some of us will be able to create
>>> new aesthetic movements to get things through in order to plant the seeds
>>> for an eventual rebirth, and some people are already working on this.
>>> Alexander Bard
>>>
>>> Techno-Optimistic
>>> Technological advancements will save humanity and will save our planet.
>>> Next-generation innovations will heroically avert any and all calamities.
>>> Humanity's best days are ahead because of the power of technology and
>>> innovation.
>>> Elon Musk
>>>
>>> Folk-Bildung 3.0
>>> This involves empowering everybody through bildung to act and take
>>> sustainable action where they are.  The formal political systems also ought
>>> to be there; they may not live up to our expectations, but if we want clean
>>> water in the pipes, modern medicine, food for 8 billion people, safe
>>> transportation, and solid science to back decisions, there also needs to be
>>> institutions and political with which to collaborate.
>>> Lene Rachel Andersen
>>>
>>> Peer to Peer
>>> This involves people cooperatively pooling their resources through
>>> commons in a way that is complementary to business and government with the
>>> idea that this can create prosperity for all.
>>> Michel Bauwens
>>>
>>> The Regenerative Renaissance / Bio-Transformation / “MettaModernism"
>>> This involves harnessing nature-based and biological insights and
>>> explicitly more feminine embodied intuitions and felt senses to
>>> paradigm-shift modernity, and its discontents, into regenerative business
>>> models and systems that temper and transform abstraction, extraction,
>>> accumulation, exploitation, and mechanistic thinking with lived
>>> experiences, expressions, and practices of interdependence, reciprocity,
>>> reverence, caring wholeness/healing. It means engaging in purpose-led
>>> systemic transformation and institutional innovation and entrepreneurial
>>> processes, where purpose is explicitly a felt experience of
>>> love/caring—free from personality patterns and cognitive distortions from
>>> developmental challenges—moving into action through constellations of
>>> people, data, and things (that have a business model attached).
>>> Nick Jankel
>>>
>>> Meta-Sensemaking
>>> We really need to greatly improve our sensemaking amid the panoptic
>>> bombardment of information and ever-shifting technology.
>>> Mark Stahlman via Marshall McLuhan
>>>
>>> Ecology of Mind
>>> We can use our understanding of ecology in conjunction with warm data
>>> and the nuances and complexities of various aspects of life to help us
>>> intuitively make better choices.
>>> Nora Bateson
>>>
>>> Revolutionary Anti-Capitalistic
>>> We need to overthrow the capitalist bourgoisie before they destroy the
>>> world with their unquenchable greed.
>>> Doctrinaire Marxists
>>>
>>> Holistic Back-to-Nature
>>> We need to re-discover our indigenous roots and live in harmony with
>>> nature, which will involve much less consumption and a dramatic decrease in
>>> industrialization.
>>> Greta Thunberg
>>>
>>> Doomer Defeatist
>>> There is no way to head off disaster so the best you can do is to save
>>> yourself and your family and maybe the members of the ethnic group that you
>>> identify with.
>>> Steve Bannon
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Brandon Norgaard
>>> *Founder, The Enlightened Worldview Project*
>>>
>>> *From:* theory of knowledge society discussion <
>>> [log in to unmask]> *On Behalf Of *Jonathan Rowson
>>> *Sent:* Monday, November 29, 2021 12:21 AM
>>> *To:* [log in to unmask]
>>> *Subject:* Re: TOK Approaches to Addressing the Meta-Crisis
>>>
>>> *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click
>>> links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
>>> content is safe.
>>> ------------------------------
>>> Hi Brandon,
>>>
>>> Thanks for sharing this initiative.
>>> The cartological hedonist in me is always happy to see conceptual
>>> classifications mapped out in tabular form, and I look forward to seeing
>>> the table populated.
>>>
>>> My slightly heretical view on this matter (which doesn't undermine the
>>> value of what you are doing at all) is that you are likely to find
>>> quite quickly that these approaches are actually responding to different
>>> things. I believe that's because it doesn't really make sense to think of
>>> the meta-crisis as singular (even as a singular higher order representation
>>> of multiple phenomena) because meta means so many things (alas, one more
>>> now due to Facebook becoming Meta, which risks supplanting the meaning of
>>> the others). This is not merely a pedantic point, but directly shapes our
>>> perception of how we should act and what a good vision(s) of the future
>>> might look like.
>>>
>>> It is true that all the problems are really one underlying problem, but
>>> it's *also* *at least* equally true that the one underlying problem is
>>> many problems.
>>>
>>> I am a pragmatist on such matters, so I'm arguing here not about
>>> underlying (ontological) reality but the efficacy of our epistemic tools to
>>> grapple with it and act with optimal discernment. In this respect, I came
>>> to the view that it's useful to distinguish between the
>>> reckoning(pandemic), the emergency (ecological), the crisis (governance)
>>> and to recognise that they have their own kind of problem, prior to
>>> invoking anything meta. Only then, and depending on your patience and
>>> appetite, I think we can make sense of around ten distinct meta-crises or,
>>> perhaps wiser, we can cluster them into four clusters with distinct
>>> punctuation as a way of showing their same-but-different nature. It's
>>> another conversation entirely, but for those who are interested, there is a
>>> glimpse in the table here
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__systems-2Dsouls-2Dsociety.com_wp-2Dcontent_uploads_2021_02_Tasting-2Dthe-2DPickle-2DTable.jpg&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=E-VjBap0M2pwmtSsasn2xJsb9AJswoARW6JMsL062-4&s=clrln8mtFGaJ23uQpl7QBysqGmi11bCa2PH5K08kee8&e=>,
>>> and the full story is outlined in the attached essay. I believe grasping
>>> that range of perspectives and experiencing them in your own life is what
>>> it means to 'taste the pickle'.
>>>
>>> All the best,
>>>
>>> Jonathan.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 07:52, Lene Rachel Andersen <[log in to unmask]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click
>>> links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
>>> content is safe.
>>> ------------------------------
>>> Hi Brandon,
>>> Excellent!
>>> How about folk-bildung 3.0 as we are working on it in the Global Bildung
>>> Network & Nordic Bildung: empowering everybody through bildung to act and
>>> take sustainable action where they are?
>>> The formal political systems also ought to be there; they may not live
>>> up to our expectations, but if we want clean water in the pipes, modern
>>> medicine, food for 8 billion people, safe transportation, and solid science
>>> to back decisions, there also needs to be institutions and political fora
>>> with which to collaborate.
>>> / Lene
>>> On 29-11-2021 08:13, Brandon Norgaard wrote:
>>>
>>> *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of JMU. Do not click
>>> links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the
>>> content is safe.
>>> ------------------------------
>>> Hello everyone, I sent a message to this list a few days ago about how
>>> we might create a table comparing the different approaches to addressing
>>> the meta-crisis.  I figure that a lot of people and organizations agree
>>> that there are these several crises that are interdependent and
>>> interrelated (ecological, political, socio-cultural, economic, educational,
>>> meaning, etc.) but there are divergent opinions about what to do.  I still
>>> haven’t heard anyone clearly define this “dark renaissance” notion, but I
>>> took a stab at defining it here based on what I remember Bard saying a few
>>> months ago.  I’m intending this to be a conversation starter.  I figure
>>> several of you guys could improve upon what I have here.  Some of this
>>> might even be just plainly wrong.  Let me know what you think:
>>>
>>>
>>> *Approach to Addressing the Meta-Crisis*
>>> *Proponents*
>>> *Notes*
>>> Rational Optimistic Enlightenment
>>> We need a more full embrace and more widespread adoption throughout the
>>> world of what already has been shown to work, which are the values and
>>> psycho-technologies of the Age of Enlightenment, such as rationality,
>>> science, progress, skepticism, liberty, fraternity, equality, and progress
>>> and getting away from ignorance, dogmatism, authority, tradition,
>>> superstition, and prejudice.  Postmodernism and critical theory have little
>>> or nothing of value to offer and are only diversions and roadblocks.
>>> Steven Pinker
>>> This is probably just a newer version of Enlightenment 1.0, so we might
>>> call it Enlightenment 1.5 or something
>>> Enlightenment 2.0
>>> We need to address the "Enlightenment Gap", which the first
>>> enlightenment never solved and which Enlightenment 1.5 doesn’t solve
>>> either.  This involves embracing enlightenment rationalism and postmodern
>>> critique, coming up with a coherent naturalistic ontology and more clear
>>> definitions for scientific terms that are taken for granted. This also
>>> involves new paradigms and new methodologies that embrace inner development
>>> integrated with science.
>>> Gregg Henriques
>>>
>>> Conscious Evolution
>>> We can become mindful of the dynamics of the fundamental force of
>>> evolution and the relation to consciousness and this will awaken our
>>> collective capacity to overcome our challenges and create a better future.
>>> In socio-political terms, this hasn't been fully developed, despite Wilber
>>> claiming to have a "theory of everything" 20 years ago, since some of this
>>> is the subject of his forthcoming 3rd book in the Kosmos Trilogy.
>>> Ken Wilber
>>>
>>> Dark Renaissance
>>> Things will go dark almost inevitably, meaning that society will break
>>> down and a new dark age will result.  But some of us will be able to create
>>> new aesthetic movements to get things through in order to plant the seeds
>>> for an eventual rebirth, and some people are already working on this.
>>> Alexander Bard
>>>
>>> Techno-Optimistic
>>> Technological advancements will save humanity and will save our planet.
>>> Next-generation innovations will heroically avert any and all calamities.
>>> Humanity's best days are ahead because of the power of technology and
>>> innovation.
>>> Elon Musk
>>>
>>> Meta-Sensemaking
>>> We really need to greatly improve our sensemaking amid the panoptic
>>> bombardment of information and ever-shifting technology.
>>> Mark Stahlman via Marshall McLuhan
>>>
>>> Ecology of Mind
>>> We can use our understanding of ecology in conjunction with warm data
>>> and the nuances and complexities of various aspects of life to help us
>>> intuitively make better choices.
>>> Nora Bateson
>>>
>>> Revolutionary Anti-Capitalistic
>>> We need to overthrow the capitalist bourgeoisie before they destroy the
>>> world with their unquenchable greed.
>>> Doctrinaire Marxists
>>>
>>> Holistic Back-to-Nature
>>> We need to re-discover our indigenous roots and live in harmony with
>>> nature, which will involve much less consumption and a dramatic decrease in
>>> industrialization.
>>>
>>>
>>> Doomer Defeatist
>>> There is no way to head off disaster so the best you can do is to save
>>> yourself and your family and maybe the members of the ethnic group that you
>>> identify with.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Brandon Norgaard
>>> *Founder, The Enlightened Worldview Project*
>>>
>>> ############################
>>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
>>> following link:
>>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Lene Rachel Andersen*
>>> Futurist, economist, author & keynote speaker
>>> President of Nordic Bildung and co-founder of the European Bildung
>>> Network
>>> Full member of the Club of Rome
>>> *Nordic Bildung*
>>> Vermlandsgade 51, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark
>>> www.nordicbildung.org
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.nordicbildung.org&d=DwMDaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=1mhEnZVLWmuEwSBQA2qwo065ZevmRvcFPNSx5kmDX3c&s=MJgClJfWBnYEBRHaFWNpDhYIdYR6GhYEl_NHiwXSsVM&e=>
>>> +45 28 96 42 40
>>> ############################
>>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
>>> following link:
>>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dr. Jonathan Rowson
>>> Founding Director, Perspectiva
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.systems-2Dsouls-2Dsociety.com_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=E-VjBap0M2pwmtSsasn2xJsb9AJswoARW6JMsL062-4&s=VLAGzXSztdzIkSXKKWLjWyK4qiDrceJkfTARGJLZnDQ&e=>
>>> Research Fellow, CUSP
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.cusp.ac.uk_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=E-VjBap0M2pwmtSsasn2xJsb9AJswoARW6JMsL062-4&s=XEjPD64QA-y120_U7RCqqJzwiWnU1HBDGvTQbzY0l18&e=>
>>> Open Society Fellow
>>> Website
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.jonathanrowson.me&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=E-VjBap0M2pwmtSsasn2xJsb9AJswoARW6JMsL062-4&s=U7b2-b11mbQkiUfgIQtoCdyTh8iT3MHGqNHzOpRsHKo&e=>
>>> Twitter
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__jonathan-5Frowson_&d=DwMGaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=PlG-RgJo1zLkTW7JP-qTMac8twk_shzTWzk8AAdq5bU&s=mHK8Fpx3RRMRP_J4lx-37wccTNB-fgy1vzYHz9Gfuno&e=>
>>> LinkedIn
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_jonathan-2Drowson-2D14799a12b_&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=E-VjBap0M2pwmtSsasn2xJsb9AJswoARW6JMsL062-4&s=C7mGSClgK4bOqJp7dpQA8aGMXELWZx6lU2q92uqSMLk&e=>
>>> *The Moves that Matter
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.amazon.co.uk_Moves-2Dthat-2DMatter-2DChess-2DGrandmaster_dp_1526603861&d=DwMFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=E-VjBap0M2pwmtSsasn2xJsb9AJswoARW6JMsL062-4&s=8bxX3LBb7F5fzLCUtVzgZyFuFniT1boClJAMISiDEEk&e=>:
>>> A Chess Grandmaster on the Game of Life* is published by Bloomsbury.
>>> ############################
>>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
>>> following link:
>>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>>> ############################
>>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
>>> following link:
>>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>>>
>>>
>>> ############################
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
>>> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
>>> following link:
>>> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>>>
>> ############################
>
> To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list: write to:
> mailto:[log in to unmask] or click the
> following link:
> http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1
>

############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1