TOK-SOCIETY-L Archives

May 2019

TOK-SOCIETY-L@LISTSERV.JMU.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Lloyd Jones <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
tree of knowledge system discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 21 May 2019 11:15:05 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1486 bytes) , text/html (3906 bytes)
John, and TOK,
Thank for for your exceptionally thoughtful and inspiring note. I’m hopeful that you can continue to afford my questions. I am out of my ilk here. 

Can you please tell me if you think we might be using the term “determinism” or “deterministic" differently from each other? Events can have causes, and some events have definitive causes, but does that ever mean that the outcome is determined as in predetermined to only have one possible outcome.  

For example, a system of negentropy provides a predetermined type of result, as in the ordering of a solar system and, as you mentioned, the evolution of organisms. But can the specific results--how many planets are formed, how many of them are gas giants, and so forth--not remain beyond prediction and be not predetermined?  In other words, is there space between a "determined type” of result, such as an ordered solar system, and a specific result, such as planet Earth?

Thank you again for your patience with me,
Peter


Peter Lloyd Jones
[log in to unmask]
562-209-4080

Sent by determined causes that no amount of will is able to thwart. 



> On May 21, 2019, at 9:57 AM, JOHN TORDAY <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Schrodinger, What is Life?


############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1


ATOM RSS1 RSS2