Hi all,

Had some thoughts about psychology and just thought I’d share here to
perhaps spark discussion or elicit your thoughts.

As an undergraduate, I had the opportunity to experience a broad range of
classes. Though I majored in Psychology, I took a course in Modern Physics.
This course was focused on general relativity and quantum mechanics. I also
took a course called Philosophy and the Physics, which focused primarily on
the measurement problem in quantum mechanics.

The physics course touched on what was strange about these theories, but
primarily showed us how to use them. I.e., here’s an equation used to solve
this problem, do repetitions of this type of problem to learn how to use it
to solve similar problems using the same equation (and so on). However, it
wasn’t until I took the philosophy course that I started to understand the
depth of how strange quantum mechanics is.

Essentially, I started to develop an understanding of how to effectively
use quantum mechanics for solving pragmatic, real world scientific
problems. But, through the philosophy course, I also gained insight into
what it was missing, what was strange about it, and the deep theoretical
issues that pertain to trying to even talk about it coherently.

One day I attended a colloquium held by the philosophy professor that
taught my Philosophy and the Physics course. His talk referenced the
measurement problem, and it was addressed to the physics department.
However, rather than sparking a discussion on what the theoretical issues
with understanding quantum mechanics, the physics professors quickly made
it into an egotistical thing. They turned the Q and A into a discussion
about their own research, but weren’t particularly interested in discussing
the fact that no current theory provides a complete answer to how a
measurement is made (when the wave function collapses).

I had the realization that a similar thing seems to occur in Psychology.
The psychologists doing research are, effectively, doing the same thing the
physicists are doing. That is, using the scientific tools and methods that
we have (and are developing) to solve problems. This lies in a technical
domain, largely, rather than a theoretical domain (at least in so far as
the nature of the problem-solving requires a technical approach).

I see a similar thing played out in the field of psychology as I did with
physics. Though some are highly interested in the strange theoretical
interpretations of the facts that we have, most are more concerned with
developing their own research program. Essentially, the field at large
seems to be disinterested in reconciling what we know from the science with
some of the strange occurrences that we observe that can’t be answered
using empirical, technical approaches. For instance, how can we reconcile
the modern scientific viewpoint with the utility that religious thought has
provided for thousands (and many more) years prior to when we were even
capable of conducting the science that we conduct today? Most modern
psychological scientists do not seem to be interested in answering this
question, but instead focus on their own domain of scientific inquiry. For
example, a psychological scientist that studies anxiety may ask how the
impact of self-quarantine impacts self-reported anxiety. This question is
measureable, observable, quantifiable, but is not concerned with how an
individual’s life path and mentality may shift permanently due to anxiety
about the coronavirus and behavior in self-quarantine.

Maybe these examples are poor for what I’m trying to illustrate, but I’m
mostly just “thinking out loud.”

What are your thoughts? Are the philosophical and technical modes of
thinking reconcilable? Are scientists actually concerned with the broader
theoretical questions, but use the technical methods as the modality for
understanding them? Are these really separate modalities of thinking, or
are they necessarily intertwined?

Interested to hear your thoughts.

Thanks for reading,

Cole
-- 
Cole Butler
TPAC Project Coordinator
University of Maryland
UMD ADHD Lab <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.umdadhd.org_cole&d=DwIFaQ&c=eLbWYnpnzycBCgmb7vCI4uqNEB9RSjOdn_5nBEmmeq0&r=HPo1IXYDhKClogP-UOpybo6Cfxxz-jIYBgjO2gOz4-A&m=zj6BjpquhqlPkksGTuDjDVNFLhjoALYbEoRKfuZKlSM&s=giaDTMY28ccKby0kHNMohrtfhDEGoSHDW0dDz0U0A3k&e=>
2103W, Cole Field House | College Park, MD 20742
tel 301.405.6163

############################

To unsubscribe from the TOK-SOCIETY-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://listserv.jmu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=TOK-SOCIETY-L&A=1